this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
736 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23036 readers
2943 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 201 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hey look, a foreigner actively engaging in voter fraud!

[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Next he’ll be eating dogs… right?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

His emerald mine slaves may have to eat dog to survive.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

More likely they get fed to the dogs if they misbehave.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

They already have that position covered.

[–] [email protected] 141 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's too fucking bad that the FEC is essentially powerless due to partisan politics.

[–] [email protected] 113 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Republican partisan politics.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Oh, 100% - I should have been clearer that this erosion of enforcement is entirely driven by the GOP and quite intentional.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago

Things like this are their goal when they use buzz words like relaxed regulation, "small government", and "free market".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

America badly needs electoral reform and viable third parties. This FPTP, pay-to-win system creates is such a dumpster fire.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (11 children)

Cool, so it’s fine if Mark Cuban does the same thing for the Democrats, right?

Right???

[–] [email protected] 50 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Of course he’s not, it’s a hypothetical question. It would be election interference if the Democrats did it.

The Republicans, however can ostensibly do whatever the crap they want without repercussions as the FEC looks on with their head all the way up their own sphincter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

~~Idiots~~ Right-wingers will assert that George Soros is, no evidence wanted or needed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

I see articles like this stating he has donated $0 and doesn't intend to contribute anything. He also calls out Musk for what he is doing.

According to OpenSecrets.org, which tracks campaign financing, Cuban last donated to a candidate in 2002, when he gave $1,000 to Democratic California Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren's campaign.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Of course, since most of the internet can't detect sarcasm, you're getting down voted.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Haha, oh well. As long as a few people see the obvious hypocrisy I’m trying to point out in our system. What does the FEC even do if not this kind of stuff????

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is in contrast to the regular legal type of vote buying of course.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

You mean like the practice of handing out water, watm beverages, and sometimes snacks to people stuck in long waiting likes to vote in mostly southern and majority, minority districts. If only giving a $1 bottle of water away for free was nearly as bad as giving away $1,000,000 to potential voters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Musk claims it is "a random $1 million payment each day to one registered voter" but is it really random or he is cherry picking 'specific' supporters?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I doubt anyone is getting money

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Another Melon Eusk won the daily lottery? Sure seems to be a common name!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And Speech is free money. Source: Skyrim

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

In principle, the same is true for the real world.

It it one of my favorite silly thought experiments: what could someone do if they were persuasive enough? The answer is, in principle, pretty much anything.

Imagine someone with the Devil's charisma; they can literally persuade anyone into anything. Such a person, coming from nowhere, could be running the entire country in an afternoon.

  1. Walk to the White House gate. Persuade the guard to let you in to meet a staffer.

  2. Meet the staffer. Persuade them to let you meet with the president and vice president.

  3. Persuade the Vice President to resign, and persuade the President to nominate you as the new VP and set up a meeting with key house and senate leaders.

  4. Persuade the House and Senate to confirm your nomination.

  5. Persuade the President to resign.

In the real world, if they had a high enough "charisma score," anyone could literally become president in a single afternoon. They could be an absolute nobody with zero background in leadership or high office. But if someone had some demonic ability to just talk people into anything, they could be running the country in an afternoon.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago

Garland: "I will treat this with as much importance as I do with everything surrounding Trump doing bad things...."

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Seems like it should have been " charged with"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I don't understand what's being implied here.

The petition states, "By signing below, I am pledging my support for the First and Second Amendments."

It says nothing about buying votes, pledging to vote for a candidate, or providing any proof that you voted at all. The only requirement is that you are registered voter in one of a handful of states.

As a registered democrat in PA, what's preventing me from signing the petition and getting some free cash? If I believe that voting for Harris is a vote to support the first and second amendments, which I fully do, what's the problem?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)

His purpose for providing the money is not just for you to sign a partition. It is to buy your favor and join him in voting for Trump. You are foolish if you think otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

to buy your favor and join him in voting for Trump.

Where do you see this?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (3 children)

His entire push is for people to vote for Trump the money and the petition is for you to enter his camp. Stop playing dumb.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not dumb. It's a legitimate question if we're talking legality.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Musk did go to a Trump rally and say specifically voting for Trump is to preserve your first amendment rights and then offered to pay for people to vote to protect their first amendment rights. That seems legally questionable to me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're ignoring my question.

The article, which is quoting someone on twitter, states that what he's doing is illegal because he's offering to buy votes. This is in contrast to what the petition actually states. There is no requirement for you to vote for anyone at all in order to get paid and enter a lottery. That is, unless you can direct me to something that explicitly, in writing, supports your claim.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Oh my goodness let me break it down for you. It is not just illegal to to pay people to vote it is illegal to pay people to register to vote. He is using a lottery system which pays people money to sign his petition the requirement to sign the petition is you have to be registered to vote. The Petition could say I like eggs. The petition is meaningless. The purpose is to get people to register to vote that are like minded to Elon using the possible payment of large sums of money. "Musk’s sweepstakes-style award is only available for registered swing-state voters who sign his right-wing PAC’s pledge." - https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/20/24274971/elon-musk-1-million-prize-america-pac-petition-voting-presidential-election

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can’t you just take the money and then vote for whoever you want?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Yes you can. The focus is on getting people to register to vote that are like minded to Elon but you can play him and take the money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (10 children)

I read elsewhere that the issue was that you had to sign the petition to be eligible to win, and that you had to be a registered voter to sign the petition. So technically it was paying to get you to register. Which is not allowed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m guessing it will also play into Trump’s voter fraud claims later. Use Musk’s petition as “proof” that votes for him weren’t counted/were converted to Harris/some other nonsense claim because it’s heavily implied if you’ve signed the petition that you would be voting for trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

“Clearly illegal” has become the new “our best iPhone yet.”

You can expect to hear it very regularly and also expect that it will make zero difference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Is this like that email that if you forwarded it, Bill Gates was gonna make you a bazillionaire, because he invented the Internet or something?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

I’ll be more shocked if anything comes of it

load more comments
view more: next ›