this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
142 points (100.0% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1800 readers
202 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!

Meanwhile On Grad

Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!

What is a Tankie?

Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)

Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia — (Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
142
TIL that malnutrition isn't an issue in North Korea (ponder.cat)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is a weird one. Bear with me. From [email protected]:

So I said to myself, "that's a little bit weird. The US one going up, I can actually believe, but the North Korea one being lower is definitely wrong."

I think Our World In Data is just being shoddy, as they often do.

https://www.wfp.org/countries/democratic-peoples-republic-korea

https://www.statista.com/statistics/269924/countries-most-affected-by-hunger-in-the-world-according-to-world-hunger-index/

The thing I found funny, and why I'm posting here, comes from observing why it was that they started their graph at 2003 and exactly at 2003.

I feel like you could use this as a slide in a little seminar in "how to curate your data until it matches your conclusion, instead of the other way around."

And also, I don't think the hunger rate suddenly dropped from epic to 0 exactly in 2003, I think more likely Our World in Data is just a little bit shoddy about their data.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 92 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can't believe you would doubt the reliable reporting of the People's Divine Monarchy of North Korea

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Only what they say is true, anything else about them, including from independent journalists, is propoganda

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago

Cherry picking data has long been a problem. I recall a short piece from high school in the 80s called something like “How to Lie with Statistics.” It’s always stuck with me.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This article talks about the global famine relief effort for North Korea in 2002 that included monitoring so food actually went to people.

https://asiasociety.org/famine-north-korea

So yes, I believe it could have gone from epic to 0 in one year because most of the developed world came together and shipped food to North Korea.

And it's still shameful that it's increasing in the US.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

But... it's very rare that sustained international intervention into a basically hostile country to solve a decades-long issue ever even works the way it's supposed to in the first place, let alone reduces the problem it was trying to address from "crisis" to "totally nonexistent" within the space of one year.

Here are some other stats about hunger in North Korea over time:

https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/PRK/north-korea/hunger-statistics

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Trends-of-chronic-malnutrition-among-North-Korean-children-by-year_fig2_322157603

I am sure there is variation by how you measure things, which is why those graphs look radically different, but my point is that they don't shoop down to 0 all of a sudden in one year and then stay there.

My suspicion is that it stopped being possible to get good data in 2003, for some reason, and they just fell back on horrible data instead, which is why the sudden discontinuous change that's at odds with all the other data sources I could find.

And it’s still shameful that it’s increasing in the US.

Agreed. And that probably does correspond to actual desperate poverty.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Of course, not the NK lying.

You fell for their propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The propaganda is that they asked for food, the developed world sent it with monitors to ensure it went to people and then they said it helped?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

No, that the problem just vanished like that, contrary to the sparse information coming out of NK, where everyone except Kim is more or less malnourished.

You seriously believe the NK data?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

It is probably based on numbers from the North Korean government

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Lemmygrad is hilarious, you fell for propaganda

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You fell for clickbait. If you read it, you notice that they basically debunk the title

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

At what point did I fall for it?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

The issue here is, there's no way to confirm the data as all these dictatorship tend to manipulate their data before releasing it, and you have no way to confirm anything. Only idiots will eat it up.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

10.7 million people are undernourished
18% of children are stunted (impaired growth and development due to chronic malnutrition)
25.9 million population

That's pretty terrible. I couldn't find an apples to apples comparison, but the best numbers put food insecurity (not the same at all as malnutrition) at 5-13.5% (5% was severe food insecurity), and growth stunting was <5% (not sure on the severity).

Having ~40% of your population be malnourished is horrendous. This is absolutely cherry-picked data at best.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This chart is specifically the death rate. The other charts you provided are "affected by" aggregate statistics or "undernourished" if I understand correctly.

It seems possible that NK is improving on people dying directly from it or deaths are being categorized differently (if everyone is malnourished, another more immediate cause of death may be recoreded).

So I'm not sure this is entirely wrong.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

All three charts measure different things, yes. I suspect that "Our World in Data" is converting some more complex metrics into "estimated deaths per 100,000" to have an apples to apples comparison, and doing it badly in this case, since their numbers are so different from other sources. It could be also that they just can't get good numerical data out of North Korea. Some sources don't even quote numbers because there would be too much guesswork involved.

But I definitely wouldn't count that, or "deaths are being categorized differently by the government" as a sign that this isn't wrong. The literal death rate from malnutrition in North Korea is far from negligible like it is in China, Vietnam, or the US (even with it going up in the US). You don't have 20% of your children with stunted growth without some of them being too weak to make it and dying of some condition due to malnutrition. And that absolutely haunting video of the starving North Korean woman gathering grass, who died shortly after the interview, is from 2010.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Something else to consider, whether Cuba, DPRK, or anywhere else is the impact of sanctioning.

Edited to hopefully correct formatting

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. In addition to causing massive suffering, they often work backwards, too, strengthening the regime they're trying to weaken.

Also. In the early 60s, the list of communist countries in the world was:

  • China
  • Cuba
  • Soviet Union
  • East Germany
  • Hungary
  • Czechoslovakia
  • Poland
  • Mongolia
  • Romania
  • Albania
  • Bulgaria
  • North Korea
  • Yugoslavia
  • North Vietnam

The list of countries with State Department restrictions preventing US citizens from traveling there, with severe penalties, was:

  • China
  • Cuba
  • North Korea
  • Vietnam
  • Albania
  • Hungary

The list of countries which are still communist today is:

  • China
  • Cuba
  • North Korea
  • Vietnam

Preventing a communist country from being visited by tourists from the US, to "punish" them, is among the most effective methods ever devised for strengthening its communist government and allowing it to keep its hold on power.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The list of countries which are still communist today is:

Correction: the list is actually { }. Hope that helps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

but ya see, it took 48 years of feeding the starving into the foodschmunkgeneratorium2000™ to march north korean statistics out of the state of starvation with the will and pure physical determination of the people! just not the living/s

load more comments
view more: next ›