this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
246 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22131 readers
3808 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump has announced the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris climate accords, citing a focus on domestic energy production and rolling back Biden-era climate policies.

This move, which can be completed in one year, will align the U.S. with nations such as Iran, Libya, and Yemen as the only UN-recognized countries outside the global pact.

Critics warn it undermines global climate efforts, ceding leadership to China, which has aggressively expanded green technologies.

Trump pledged to boost fossil fuels while continuing nuclear power investment.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 84 points 2 months ago (2 children)

All of this effort to stay in the past will only ensure America is not a world power in the coming years. If you aren't at the forefront of green energy you are at risk of becoming the very fuel you drill.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We’ve already let China own the market for renewable energy, EVs, high speed rail, etc this gives them four more years to consolidate their gains without competition.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I really think the point is to weaken us to irrelevance against Russia. Thing is, this military just dont disappear.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In 3 years, some green-energy country is going to invade the sandy dust-bowl North American continent to use our land for wind, solar, and algae-based bio-fuels. We might fight at first, but we'll be too fat or sick or both to actually do anything about it.

When we finally emerge from our state of extreme foot-shootery, we'll look around and realize what's happened: American exceptionalism has won the day again! And then we'll invade some country with oil and talk about how smart and rich we are.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

extreme foot-shootery

Leoparded face

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The funny thing is the first time around he could have made a difference to the world by withdrawing from those accords and setting even more strict goals for the US to lead the world. But there's no profit in that.

As we rocket past the Accords' 1.5C limit, doubling down on more fossil fuel use and removing what environmental policies we had will counter anything positive the rest of the world does.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Could have been a ton of profit in it. Instead we want it to be like our healthcare system. A complete, overly expensive, behind the times sack of garbage.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A purely symbolic gesture. The USA didn't actually have to withdraw from the accords before it could ignore the accords, in which case it would have plenty of company.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In doing so, the United States will join a tiny club of countries outside of the global consensus

The US is proudly outside of the global consensus on many issues and standards. Many, if not most Americans, believe that we are different, special, exceptional. We don't join the rest of the world, the rest of the world joins us, whether they want to or not.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not most, just the vocal few. At least where I am, Colorado, there is massive support for being a member of a global world. Things like clean energy are very important to us!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I think most Americans, Colorado notwithstanding, believe that the US is exceptional. Most Americans still believe the US is the "shining city upon a hill," as Reagan put it. Maybe it's not as many as it used to be, but I think it's still most.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And for some reason the rest of the world tends to think Americans are arrogant assholes. I know lots of nice Americans but they're just not as loud as the not-nice ones.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I skimmed through the inauguration VoD. The amount of cheering from the audience for signing that executive order was heartbreaking.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Related, I just went to the comment section of a french-translated video of Trump's inauguration (admittedly uploaded by a conservative french journal, Le Figaro), and all of the comments were dithyrambic. It's extremely depressing. Makes you wonder, how can we work against ourselves like that? where are we even going?