this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
1378 points (100.0% liked)

memes

13460 readers
3543 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] noride@lemm.ee 178 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They also emit real photons. 🀯

[–] YoFrodo@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yep, virtual lights work the same as real lights

[–] flames5123@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If they’re not looked at, they don’t consume as much electricity. So there’s that difference.

[–] IonAddis@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

If you have your back to them, they don't emit light either!

Edit: Well, reflections, for you with the FANCY GPUs...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Nah, fuck that. Buys e-ink monitor

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] don@lemm.ee 79 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And by convention, all vehicles in video games are electric.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

technically they all make fake combustion noises, which is worse.

[–] weker01@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why? I like combustion noises

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I upvoted both of these because chaos

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which is really unexpected if you're looking at an oil lamp.

Change electricity to energy and we’re good again

[–] rhacer@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

More interestingly, lamps in video games use the same amount of real electricity if they are on or off.

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 40 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Not necessarily, on OLED displays (which are definitely a thing for desktop computers and TVs) a light that's turned off is using less power because the pixels the lamp is displayed on (and the ones around it too) are dimmer.

[–] CanaryWhiskey@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

YELLS IN GPU VERTEX PIPELINE

that consumes electricity. ever think about the poor gpu? about how your words hurt its feelings?

jokes aside the power to process a few hundred vertices every frame is insignificant

And traditional LCDs with a backlight use more power for darkness. The LCD is transparent by default and turns opaque/black when a voltage is applied.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Actually, the pixels go completely black and do not consume any electricity at all in that state.

You might be thinking of early OLEDs, which had to stay on at all times to prevent blur/smearing. But panel manufacturers solved that problem a few years ago. Don't remember exactly when the change happened, but I remember first seeing true black OLEDs sometime around 2017/2018.

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

When a lamp turns off it doesn't become a black hole. Previous commenter was correct, though I appreciate your info about OLED

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] flames5123@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Highly depends on the rendering engine and if you’re looking at it, as it could unrender if you look away, meaning less energy used.

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did you know that if we took all the rhinos left on the planet, put them in a rocket ship and launched it towards the sun, the would travel 91.511 million mi, and die along the way?

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 35 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Akshually we currently have no rocket with enough power to launch that much mass towards the Sun. People always assume because the Sun has a lot of gravity, stuff moves toward it automatically. But when launching from Earth that's not the case. Earth is in orbit around the Sun, in order to get to the Sun you need to lose all that energy. Since rhino's are heavy af you'd need a mighty rocket indeed.

We could with some effort maybe launch one small rhino, say 600-700kg towards the Sun. And it requires some fancy ass orbital mechanics. So it would travel way more than 91.511 million miles before ending up in the Sun. This rhino would probably not survive the launch, which is just as well given its destination and travel time.

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Subscribe to more space facts

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aedis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

While getting a rocket or probe to hit the sun smack in the middle sounds hard to do, you can get obliterated by it with much less delta-v.

You need to get to the Earth's escape velocity and just cleverly align the angle of escape so that you get an eccentric enough heliocentric orbit that you'd end up some 6 million kms close to the sun. Anything closer than that is literally overkill.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago

So an oil lamp in a video game is actually an electric lamp?

[–] latsss@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Shades in video games use even more electricity

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not on OLED screens + prebaked lightning

[–] latsss@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That's too specific conditions, but okay :)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl 16 points 1 month ago

Even if the lamps are off.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

If you're using an older LCD screen, turning off the lamp uses more electricity than leaving it on

[–] lelgenio@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

If the game is demanding enough they also consume the same amount of electricity, maybe even more.

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Playing a fireplace video produces real heat.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] deathbysnusnu@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

But what about candles?

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We should demand that they are oil lamps from now on to save the planet

Just make the player stumble in pitch black darkness through the entire game, duh.

[–] NutWrench 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Lamps in video games aren't real. It's the video game that's using the electricity.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Video games aren't real. It's the computer components that use electricity

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

computer components aren't real. It's all just tiny gremlins doing maths really fast and turning pixels on and off

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Tiny gremlins aren't real. It's all just a dream. Wake up you have to make me breakfast. I would like pancakes please.

load more comments (2 replies)

That's like saying "lamps don't create light, it's the flame/filament in the lamp that creates the light"

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The lamp is rendered by small electric lights, be it LEDs or LCD. CRTs are in a bit of an grey area. But you can absolutely use a monitor as a light source by itself .

load more comments