Now watch him try to fire all federal judges too. 🙄
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
425 points (100.0% liked)
News
29927 readers
2739 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"All federal judges not appointed by me are fired."
It would not surprise me if one of his flying monkeys in the House submitted articles of impeachment for the judge.
Good, but Trump is gonna do it anyway and fire whoever doesnt comply. The SCOTUS has guaranteed he can do whatever he wants with impunity, and the only remedy is impeachment.
This will be a good test if we have a new king or not
Interesting idea here. Give the president so much rope to hang himself with that all but the brownest of the brown-nosers find his actions reprehensible. And thus impeachment becomes a valuable tool again.
SCOTUS playing 4D chess? Not so much, they’re probably right up there with the lot of them, but one can dream.
Impeachment only works if Congress isn't filled with cowards. It was a good design when parties weren't a thing and every senator was first and foremost representing their state's interests (and actually spent most of their days in their state), but with a party duopoly that's perpetually hovering around 50/50, you'll just never get enough people to convict.
How many people do you think qualify as the brownest of brown nosers? I’m pretty sure that’s 100% of republican senators and congressmen and Trump appointed judges.
Yea? But they say that they talk so much shit about him behind closed doors!
I lost my faith that republicans would do the right thing in 2020. He should have been impeached and had his right to run for office taken away. They blocked it because they knew standing up against Trump would mean the end of their career (see Liz Cheney).
They blocked it because they knew standing up against Trump would mean the end of their career (see Liz Cheney).
Well, that or because a dictator is genuinely what they want.
Either way
Without even reading them, I know what the responses to this will be, so let me just say: I legitimately like your optimism!
How many more tests do you fucking need? The water is boiling! Get out of the pot already!
(I realize the premise of the test that this adage is based on was flawed.)
I'll go ahead and sharpen the national razor.
You don't free yourself of an entrenched tyrant by impeachment. No dictator has ever been removed peacefully.
So how does this work in practicality when the administration holds the funds back?
The Trump/Elon administration will file a poop emoji response and request expedited review from the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will rubber stamp it 6-3 with Thomas filing a concurring opinion that’s a poop emoji.
Don't you mean the court will respond with 💩 ✅ meaning they side with Trump?
We'll be in the era of emoji rulings.
Ha. I think that was in the further reading section of the Wikipedia article. You’re not wrong. I was just providing a this is what happened historically…
See Worcester v. Georgia essentially two states attempted to secede and the federal government stepped in (after first defying the court) to save the union. Does not bode well for the union at this point in history.
So has anyone been able to log back into the Payment Management Services portal Medicaid and HeadStart providers need yet? (archived)
Telling the Trump administration to stop doing stuff to undermine federal funding now seems like closing the barn door after the horses have already been taken out and put on a trailer that's currently speeding towards the glue factory.
The full scope of the administration’s review was spelled out in a 51-page spreadsheet sent to federal agencies and viewed by The Associated Press. Each line was a different government initiative, from pool safety to tribal workforce development to special education.
Officials were directed to answer a series of yes or no questions for every item on the list, including “does this program promote gender ideology?” or “does this program promote or support in any way abortion?” Responses are due by Feb. 7.
This is where my heart sank. This article is so long but this blip and the conclusion points to what is really going down.
Here we go again
Fuck the republican traitor filth.
Justice Department attorney Daniel Schwei argued that the freeze shouldn’t be put on hold because the plaintiffs hadn’t specified anyone who would immediately lose funding if it does go into effect.
I'm imagining the plaintiffs countered by motioning vaguely at the entire country.
Also fuck this guy. "It doesn't count unless you specifically identify all the people we'd be victimizing," is straight up bully logic.
Isn't this common? You need standing to sue, someone has to be harmed first. Its not all the people, but at least one.