this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
139 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

10389 readers
1454 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xep@fedia.io 53 points 1 month ago

You don't respond to trolls. This is one of the earliest rules of the internet.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm willing to bet my ass that gamers cheering for the ubisoft layoff will be complaining about the "good old time" of AAA studio in a couple of years. Spoiler: devs are losing their jobs, not executives.

[–] ghostface@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well they aren't cheering for the employees who are laid off. It's more like the Luigi killing of the murderer uhc exec. The people weren't happy the exec was dead but that the protection they felt as a CEO was broken. Same with Ubisoft they have been behaving badly for so long., EA as well, the gamers just want change for the better and layoffs signal that change

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

The thing is, when you side with the anti-woke crowd, you make them feel legitimate. The latest AC game wasn't even out and gamers were crushing it because "black samurai" and "women".

Also, people are praising Steam, who has under 100 employees, takes 30% of the price of EVERY GAMES SOLD, and doesn't let you own you games, but bashing studios (purely greedy capitalist business too, we agree) with thousands of employees who in the end are mostly passionate devs... That doesn't make much sens to me and sadly, in the end it's always devs that will pay for executive's bad decision.

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Also, people are praising Steam, who has under 100 employees, takes 30% of the price, and doesn’t let you own you games, but bashing studios (purely greedy capitalist business too, we agree) with thousands of employees who in the end are mostly passionate devs…

One is releasing a good product and the other don't? Most people care for their money spend.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They clearly don't considering they're not boycotting Steam which takes a much bigger cut than it needs to.

But hey, as long as it's Gabe that has a yacht collection, it's alright!

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How Steam getting a bigger cut is impacting their products negatively? Do you really believe by decreasing the margin the game will be cheaper? Even when the same game has the same price in PS5/Xbox/Switch and PC. That's my point people doesn't care with things that doesn't affect them directly, the Steam margin hurts a lot less the end user for them to care.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's hurting consumers because it's less money going to the people doing the actual work to bring them a product and more money going to the boss who's a billionaire that has a yacht collection.

Always funny to see the anti establishment crowd looking the other way when it comes to Valve.

The only reason games are so expensive is because of all the leeches above the devs, the devs could make the same amount of money they currently make while reducing a ton of overhead going to multi-millionaires and billionaires, otherwise more money could go to the devs and less to the leeches, no matter the alternative, it would be better for the consumers.

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The only reason games are so expensive is because of all the leeches above the devs, the devs could make the same amount of money they currently make while reducing a ton of overhead going to multi-millionaires and billionaires, otherwise more money could go to the devs and less to the leeches, no matter the alternative, it would be better for the consumers.

Sadly that's only works with indie studios. Cutting 30% of steam for a Ubisoft/EA game only moves the money to Ubisoft/EA.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They're part of the fucking problem as well! None of those rich assholes need people like you defending them!

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

That’s my point people doesn’t care with things that doesn’t affect them directly, the Steam margin hurts a lot less the end user for them to care.

Yeah they are, but the whole argument is: Why people are praising Steam but bashing studios. I'm telling the why: For the vast majority of people what matters is the product that they consume, Steam release good stuff, the big studios are struggling to release anything good. Changing anything about how Steam operates barely impact anything about the studios and slops continues to be released. -30% with Steam and the stakeholders of the studios get 30% more money, the devs continues to be underpaid and overworked like always and the head of studio is still chasing a trend. That's why nobody cares about Steam.

In Bioware case, the devs have had problems with the studio since DAO, most people didn't care until Anthem, the first big failure, and they released two more bad games. If at least Veilguard was good, people will not say anything about how the devs suffered to release the game, because they received a good product.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago

It's baffling to see that it's absolutely impossible to emit any form of criticism about steam (a soul-less dirty capitalist business like any other) without having an army of gamers ready to die to defend it. Yeah they offer a pretty good service, but taking a 30% on games is ridiculous.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 1 points 4 weeks ago

Yes but muh bougie activism.

[–] ghostface@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

And this is the sad reality of Dev will suffer over executive decisions good or bad. Despite the fact that the industry has responded over and over again, just make good games and the gamers will play. But also sadly make bad games and gamers support that too soooo?

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 4 points 4 weeks ago

This is true for a lot of people but unfortunately there very much are some targeting the people losing their jobs. I've seen plenty of people, even some on Lemmy in the past, who hate individual devs because the game they were looking forward to wasn't good.

Is it a loud minority? Probably. That doesn't make it OK, though, and it doesn't reduce the mental hit to these devs in an already bad moment of their lives.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 31 points 1 month ago

So the core video complaint is here

Your $70 Doesn't Buy You Cruelty

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mkVfdbVAZE

Where I think he makes a crossed point about social media. Attacking a game worker on social media who is just minding their own business isn't cool, I agree.

However, responding to a game workers taunts on social media is exactly the engagement social media was designed for. That's why the creatives are there calling their customers toxic to get engagement

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, "gamers" are a collection of toxic mudbutt degenerates. They have gotten so bad that I'm cautious about telling anyone I enjoy video games, as I'd hate to be associated with these hateful clowns.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No joke.

I've gotten to the point where I just don't really play anything anymore because of it.

You go 'boy I'd like to see what new games are coming soon' and you immediately land in a cesspool of people throwing a fit that there's a black guy, or a trans girl, or a white chick that doesn't make their little peepee hard, as well as any other awful sexist, racist, ableist swill you can possibly imagine all over every inch of anything that remotely looks like gaming media or discussion forums.

I just kind of have quit looking, and just playing old games for the 2nd or 3rd time, despite the fact I would happily have bought anything that seems remotely fun a couple of years ago because I don't want to subject myself to those morons, end up playing games with them, or like, having anyone confuse me as being one of them as you said.

[–] atomicpoet@kbin.earth 3 points 4 weeks ago

Okay, but do so-called "gamers" actually care about video games? Because most of the time, I don't see them talking about actual video games that they enjoy.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What kind of asshole celebrates mass layoffs? What the fuck

[–] krebssteven@infosec.pub 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The ones being monkeybrained into celebrating 'poetic justice' for those they have been trained to perceive as entitled for making $70 games not worth it while being smug about an artistic vision and a 'reality of the industry' these dissatisfied customers supposedly don't get. It's the same vitriolic nonsense on social media as we see in politics. People's perspective being pitted against each other without actually facilitated communication.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I figure as much. Gross gross gross

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Morons and children.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Coal mine workers with schadenfreude who were ridiculed by code monkeys who though they were too smart to be replaced.

*narrator They were replaced

For the record, I don't agree with celebrating layoffs, I think they should direct their anger at C level actors. Nevertheless, I can understand why they react thusly, all these code monkeys have been prescribing the rest of the population how to live and how to pull themselves by the bootstraps and now find themselves in a bearish market. Before, anyone who could print "hello world" would be hired to deprive competitors of labour (see the explosion in compensation for CS jobs vs i.e. agriculture and services) now that is gone. Worst of all, that is the cadre of people that helped the C level cunts suck immense wealth from the lower class and middle class to the 1%. So ye, fucking unionise and welcome to the blue collar world, we're with you, we'll help you, but you fucking enabled every one who put you in this situation.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm a "code monkey" and never once expected anyone to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. You seem jaded at the c suite and taking it out on hypothetical devs.

I have no doubts that there is a good portion of people who work programming jobs who are also assholes, but am I in a bubble or something? Why would your average dev ridicule a coal miner? Miners work fucking hardcore jobs and deserve every penny of compensation and then some.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Have you interacted with any bougie SV dev lately?

Edit: This shit was the goto motto for every code bro within a 10 mile radius of the valley.

And I'm glad you have the empathy to recognise that although the coal industry was a pox upon the environment the people working in coal mines have a harrowing job and deserve fair compensation. (as do every other professionals that do honest work)

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I try not to - bougie SV devs are bougie and SV :P

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 2 points 4 weeks ago

I know m8.

I thought empathy was an evolutionary trait, turns out it's a skill, and some peeps (geographically around the valley) have evolutionary advantage by letting it wane. Set a wall centered on Philz (fuck Forbes for making it hip for the bros) and barricade up to a 10 mile radius. Solve half of earth's problems.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 11 points 4 weeks ago

"Gamers" can be pretty terrible people so this tracks.

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the case of the Veilguard, the devs responsible for the game divulgation lied or omitted the truth about the game, like in the case of Veilguard not importing the choices of previous games was leaked and doesn't seem like they planned to tell the audience before the release, so I can see why some people hold a certain grudge with the Veilguard devs, but it's stupid, it's not their decision to do things like that.

I am rooting for the demise of Bioware/EA, they have been doing bad practices for a long long time, fuck all their execs. But with their demise will happen layoffs, the only thing to do is to support the devs with their new studio, like with the games: Stray Gods or Exodus

[–] Renacles@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What gets shown to the public or not is not the decision of "the devs", there is someone at the top calling the shots.

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

but it’s stupid, it’s not their decision to do things like that.

I know, but people associate them with the game.

[–] kugmo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago

Jokes on him I spent $0 and I'm laughing at them

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

What? This is Trump levels of nonsensical.