this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
625 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22104 readers
4066 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is organizing grassroots events to oppose Trump’s policies, arguing that “Trumpism does not believe in democracy.”

In an op-ed, Sanders criticized Trump’s ties to Elon Musk, federal budget cuts, and media influence, warning of authoritarianism.

He cited Trump’s recent post likening himself to Napoleon and accused him of disregarding the rule of law.

The White House dismissed Sanders’ concerns, accusing Democrats of authoritarian tactics.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

"The White House dismissed Sanders’ concerns, accusing Democrats of authoritarian tactics."

They never fail to put the P in GOP, good ol' fucking Projection.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

As long as those that voted for Trump continue to lap up whatever he says it doesn't matter what's true. We're now just in 1984 doublespeak, where for the media, profit is more important than the truth, because really capitalism has driven us off the cliff straight into fascism

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago

We have the doublespeak and the two minutes hate: Fox news and right wing social media.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

No shit. The talking Cheeto is quoting napoleon and calling himself king

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 weeks ago

Then goes off saying democrats are using authoritarian tactics lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

came to say this.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Wasn't that obvious at very latest 4 years ago?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It must be repeated and repeated and repeated and repeated and repeated until the message gets through their thick stubborn skulls. It's how MAGA indoctrinated them in the first place and the only way to deprogram them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Sadly they are as likely to believe the dems as much as the dems will believe the reps. The only way the magats will come to believe is when each and every single one of them start to suffer, until then it is "someone else that is being hurt, not me!" Once it finally comes home they will see, but by then it may be too late.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you keep repeating something over and over again people on average are more likely to believe it, especially if it's multiple people all repeating the same point. It's part of social psychology: conformity and is the basis of psychological warfare.

Bannon and Cambridge Analytica used this to great effect via social media. Now the bosses of social media have fallen in line behind trump, this message and similar ones MUST be repeated.

This isn't a debate where whomever has the best standing with the audience or the best argument will win.

This is a shouting contest.

Every 10 second lie they spout will take 1 minute to debunk. The only way to win is to repeatedly shout a 10 second retort, finishing with "read this!" and SHOVE a list of evidence in their face.

They won't look at the list for the first two dozen times, but by the third or fourth dozen they'll take a look, that's all we can do via the soap box.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

I didn't poo-poo the idea, it is just going to take a lot of effort to get through to them. Please, keep trying, all of you (I will be dealing with something similar as a "Temu Trump" is trying to run/ruin our country as well and he has the 3 word method down, good thing Trudeau is gone and will hopefully be replaced by someone I can support).

It is just infuriating every time I check r/republican and they are stating Trumps words as fact though they have already seen that is not the case, hence why I said they would each need to suffer to see this. "Fuck you, got mine" is very prevalent down there and to a lesser degree up here as well. (I check every so often to see just how insane it is getting over there)

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

How is this helping? Sanders is doing something. What is your snark achieving?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

How is this doing something? he’s been bloviating for years about this and things have only gotten worse.

Where’s the action?!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

What is he supposed to do, kick down the doors to the white house with a machine gun in each hand?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

Keep talking, I'm liking what you're saying...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

See my other comment responding to the typical liberal lack of imagination.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

You can't get to things like general strikes if you don't start by organizing and educating people. Calling for a sudden and mass uprising of public action with no base to support it is just a wild fantasy. How are you even going to make it happen? Share some memes on BlueSky? Organized resistance needs organized people.

I fully believe that it will take a general strike, and perhaps more than that to avert fascism in the US, and every day I pray that it happens because my country is fucked if it doesn't. But I don't for a second believe that you have a realistic plan to get there when all you can think to do is dismiss the people doing the hard work of getting the public united, educated and organized.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

That’s why I’m saying bernie should be calling for it and leading the organization. He has the social clout and following. Many disillusioned with him (myself included) would see this as an actual action instead of the equivalent of just another sternly worded letter which is all the democrats and Bernie seem to be capable of doing for most of the past decade.

And fuck Bluesky. I’m not moving over to another monopoly. I never liked Twitter to begin with I don’t see why I’d like Bluesky even if it was genuinely defederated and not a corporate owned imitation of the fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (13 children)

You mean he should be saying something like this?

Trumpism will not be defeated by politicians inside the DC beltway. It will only be defeated by millions of Americans, in every state in this country, coming together in a strong, grassroots movement which says no to oligarchy, no to authoritarianism, no to kleptocracy, no to massive cuts in programs that working people desperately need, no to huge tax breaks for the richest people in our country.

Oh, wait that's a direct quote from Bernie, discussing what he's doing right now.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/19/trumpism-bernie-sanders

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Not to the MAGA-nation. Or maybe they are aware and just flat out supporting it. Not sure which is worst. Hm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.

This is known.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Bernie is completely right here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Well yes, but actually no.

First of all, don't get me wrong: I'm saying this as a massive fan of Sanders, and someone who thinks he is way more on-the-ball about the current situation than pretty much any other non-Republican nationally-significant politician (except maybe for AOC).

That said, even he is still partially in denial/massively understating the problem/playing catch-up. Trumpism doesn't just "not believe" in democracy, it is acting on that belief right now to destroy it. When the attack is already in progress, you don't say "Trump doesn't believe in democracy," you say "Trump is destroying democracy."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Thank you. I can’t believe libels are falling for this nonsense. Even in his sternly worded speeches he’s not describing the threat accurately. He’s underestimating it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

Authoritarian tactics is extremely vague. I wonder if they could name one of those tactics? Could they point out one dictator in history and criticise them? Explain why they're different? Doubtful.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok and? Are the democrats and Bernie going to do anything about it? Nope!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

What other tactics do they have available outside of making noise and organizing public events ?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

Typical liberal lack of imagination. How is it that republicans are easily able to consolidate power yet democrats are weak as hell and consistently fail to do anything at all? Vote for us! We’re powerless to do anything! But if only you voted harder we would! Ignore the fact that we confirmed trumps nominees!

He should be calling for a general strike and help organize it. Law and order is a joke, the country is collapsing at record speed. Our only non violent hope yet is an actual, French style, general strike. Protests don’t work and just play into trumps desire to declare martial law. But a general strike where people simply stay home and not work would grind this country to a halt and not trigger trumps bloodthirst to use violence against opponents.

And if that doesn’t work, violence it is. This country is fucking done and arguably it’s been done for a while now only everyday people are finally waking up to reality.

I think we’re in for it when the effects of burning through the federal government finally reach “normal” people.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago

General strike is a good idea.

[–] aubeynarf 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This guy is living in a dream world.

I might guess he’s behind a candidate that gets less than 1% of the popular vote, but in reality is just here to shame you for supporting a substantially better party than the Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

And you’re a sheep being sent to slaughter. The democrats are not acting at all like an opposition party and their strategy is beyond ineffective. The time to stop these people is now not when they’re herding us into fucking concentration camps.

Fucking liberals. 🙄🙄🙄🙄

We've tried nothing and we’re out of all ideas!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

You think he wouldn't use force? I'm all for a general strike, but if that day comes, I'm also prepared for the repercussions from a delusional president.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

A traditional strike where people group up in protest, likely. A strike where people simply stay home like it’s covid all over again… impossible to attack

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

so things like gernal strikes usually come from a major party who is part of the system one is governed under?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

“Omg we’re powerless to do anything guess we’ll just suffer”

Fucking liberals.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Ask in a thread on a different instance.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I’d love some practical ideas that aren’t political violence. The Reichstag fire didn’t exactly turn out well for Germany.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Who said anything about that? If that's what you want to talk about, it should happen in a different instance.

That said, in the abstract and speaking generally, a single instance of a particular tactic within a broad category of strategy failing does not disprove the efficacy of the entire broad category.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I assumed you wanted to talk about solutions that these mods ban. Isn’t that political violence?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No, I have no interest in being baited into getting banned.

But never mind that; can I infer from your lack of rebuttal to my actual argument that you concede the point?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

We’ve been on the receiving end of political violence daily now for decades. They want to crank up the dial on our level of suffering then they should expect we crank up our resistance to the same level.

Not a single human right was won or protected without violence.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

Right!! LW is liberal censorship land where the only acceptable forms of opposition are voting harder and marching around with signs yelling chants. Utterly pathetic and ineffectual as they lead us all to slaughter. And lead is being generous right now.

load more comments
view more: next ›