this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
946 points (100.0% liked)

Bluesky

1039 readers
706 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Trump is 100% a Russian asset, wild to see that after it was blatantly obvious the first go around we were like "yeah let's out a Russian spy back in the white house."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Half the country have always been aware of it, but are powerless to stop it, the other half either voted for him because of it- or are in complete denial that it’s happening- right before their eyes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

The important point isn’t even whether or not he is a Russian asset. He undoubtedly is, but that doesn’t actually matter. All that matters is that he’s acting like a Russian asset. He’s doing all the things a Russian asset would do. Ultimately, whether the orders are actually coming from Putin is irrelevant, because the end result is still the same.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What you are saying is that the president of the most powerful country in the world, that spend 10 times more in war than russia, that run the biggest surveillance network ever seen in history, that has thousand of military infrastructures around the planet and that has the most technological advanced army in the world is 100% a russian asset...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (6 children)

This is obviously subjective and depends how you define "asset".

If you're asking whether Trump is a red sparrow recruited as a orphan and trained in espionage, ballet, and martial arts from the age of 4, that's obviously not the case.

If you're asking whether Trump is easily manipulated by his desire for validation from competitors, or his desire to exert power over others, then that's obviously true.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yes. I think that he might push back at times for appearance sake but his foreign policy is basically just "do what's good for Russia."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It wasn’t intentional. Trump followed Putin just as Vance followed Trump. He is just too stupid to have seen how this would play out.

Getting attacked by a foreign leader is such an effective way to rally your people behind you, that governments often fabricate external threats as a way to unify their nation. Putin knew the ways this could play out. The only more desirable result for Putin would’ve been Zelenskyy reluctantly accepting the agreement, but globally discrediting the US was a guarantee.

Putin was a KGB intelligence officer for 16 years before going to work for Yeltsin. The man outsmarts intelligence experts for fun. Trump’s ignorance and ego make him the perfect patsy, and the greedy Republicans in office have fully manifested into spineless yes men that are guaranteed to stay out of his way.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Putin is not some 4D Chess master. This should be blatantly obvious since 2022. But he does not need to be what you make him out, all he needs to be is a little bit smarter than the orange idiot.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I remember the first time I started to pay attention to geopolitics. It was when George W. Bush was elected president, and it made me freak out a bit. Why would a country like America elect such an obvious idiot to the highest office?

I also remember that Putin in comparison seemed like an intelligent, sensible person, even if tad intimidating.

I'm not sure what my point is except that George W. is a genius compared to Trump.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

It wasn't too long ago, we thought palin is batsht insane and stupid,she still is but ?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Of course. I wasn’t praising him, but comparing his experience in political manipulation to Trump’s. MAGA isn’t any better, taking Putin’s word that he’d “much rather have Biden or Harris in the White House” than Trump.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago

Another big winner here is China. I would love to know the contents of that meeting between putin and xi, I think back in 2022(?)

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It wasn't disinformation - it is a pedophile who had minors delivered into his bed and was filmed during the atrocities. The resulting child pornography is what makes orange guy the lap dog of a psychotic killer.

The rest was easy with an asset that high in the ranks.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Could be. It could also just be bribes.

The current situation is really nice for countries like Russia, Saudi-Arabia and China. They just need to pay a few billion to Trump and get stuff that cannot be bought and are easily worth hundreds of billions from the US empire.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It could be either of those things certainly, but I feel like no amount of money Russia could provide would be enough for Trump, he's in control of the United States Treasury and can direct money anywhere with impunity (see also: Starlink). If they came out with a video he'd just call it fake - particularly in this age of AI - and it would have zero effect.

Russians throw people out windows all the time though. I'd be willing to bet that the threat of physical harm is all that is necessary to control him.

Or quite possibly, all three things. Keep us happy and the money keeps flowing, the porn stays in the vault and you won't be unalived.

One thing is certain: it's not nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Their new crypto grifts really take this to an extreme level. Hundreds of millions just directly given to Trump as bribes now, its actually insane.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And at this point, who cares? Tell the CIA what blackmail Putin has on you. That's what they're there for.

Don't sell out your whole gd country and the world because you're just that desperate to hide your personal crimes.

What a moron.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Because once you give into blackmail, that just opens to door to further blackmail. And every single time you give in, it makes it worse and worse. At this point, yeah Trump could get his base to arm wave away him fucking minors. But then he'd have to explain away every thing he's done for them since then, which is just treasonous.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It was mostly disinformation though, if you look at how most of the social media, and MSMs ran, it's mostly talking points from Russia in some form another

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The average American is really, really dumb

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Yes and the propaganda helped too. The billionaires in the US figured out how to get control of most of the media. It's a master class for the billionaires of the rest of the world. I imagine it won't take long for everyone else to start seeing that kind of propaganda as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The president grovels to putin: This is an unprecedented loss of u.s. soft power and the world is judging America for it's cowardice.

The president, congress and every major media organization grovels to netanyahu: ....

This does look bad on our part but the main thing making us look bad on the world stage is our support for Israel. If you ask the average person outside of the west what they find most offensive about this administration they'll probably say its genocidal policy in gaza, not it's shakedown of an ally.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That’s just not true

Countries threatened by China care a lot more about this than Gaza

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Because of one simple reason: "Don't care as long as I get mine's", personified in Trump, fueled by the increasing disdain those that have wealth and power have had for their neighbors such that the don't mind living surrounded by shit because they feel they already are.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

"Russian interference" is not just a few hackers breaking into emails—it’s a well-documented, multi-decade strategy of disinformation designed to weaken democratic institutions. The Kremlin has spent years building an extensive network of fake social media accounts, bot farms, and propaganda outlets to spread divisive narratives.

The Senate Intelligence Committee, the FBI, and cybersecurity experts have all confirmed that Russia’s influence campaigns exploit social and political fractures, using platforms like Facebook and Twitter to push misleading or outright false information. Reports from organizations like the RAND Corporation and Stanford Internet Observatory show how these tactics are designed to erode trust in democracy itself, making people more susceptible to authoritarian and extremist messaging.

This isn’t just speculation—it’s the exact playbook used in Russia’s interference in the 2016 and 2020 elections, as confirmed by U.S. intelligence agencies and the Mueller Report. The goal has always been to amplify distrust, push conspiracy theories, and create a populace that can no longer distinguish fact from fiction.

And now? We’re seeing the results. A country where misinformation spreads faster than the truth, where people take social media posts at face value instead of questioning their sources, and where a populist leader can ride that wave of disinformation straight into power.

Putin doesn’t need to fire a single shot—he’s watching Americans tear themselves apart over lies his operatives helped plant. And the worst part? Many people still refuse to acknowledge it's happening.

Putin has long stated that Russia is at war with the West—not through traditional military means, but through information warfare. Intelligence agencies, cybersecurity experts, and independent researchers have repeatedly warned that we are being targeted. Yet, many in the West refused to take it seriously.

Now, we’re losing the war—not on the battlefield, but in the minds of our own citizens, as propaganda and disinformation tear at the very fabric of democracy.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You know, I can easily imagine the first part opening a lot of peoples eyes about Trump if they saw it on it's own. Add the second part and they are likely to throw it into the flat-earth bucket of statements.

I really wonder how much of the current situation in the US is because people would rather be smug and gloat over people with different politics then actually try to convince them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"No country in history" is a pretty bold claim. Surely Britain ceding India for example would be a counterexample, just off the top of my head.

But honestly, uh, good? I don't want the US acting as global hegemon. The power and influence wielded by the nation-state only goes to benefitting the rich and powerful. It doesn't benefit ordinary people in any way, whether domestically or abroad.

I don't know why it's assumed that heading a global empire is supposed to be a good thing, it certainly doesn't align with my values as a leftist.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Britain didn't give it up out of the random whims of its government. India functionally became ungovernable. This isn't anywhere near the same thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Did USA give up any power? I'm missing something or people are not paying attention at all?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (22 children)

Yes. We are losing soft power and allies all around the world thanks to the orange menace.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (11 children)

One of our greatest strengths is that we build coalitions. We just told the world that if you ally with us, you better be ready to grovel.

For example, places like Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan are capable of building nuclear weapons but they didn't bc they trusted us to protect them. Each of those countries are now imagining themselves sitting there in front of cameras being berated for ingratitude.

Without our allies we are much less powerful.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The fact you dont have a clue speaks volumes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The people (and mainly the private companies) of an allied country redused to help America. Only under threat from the Norwegian government did the US ships get fuel. Sounds like a loss of power to me

"Huge credit to the president of Ukraine restraining himself and for keeping calm even though USA put on a backstabbing TV show. It made us sick... No Fuel to Americans!," the company said in a now deleted Facebook post - just a good excerpt from the article

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›