this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
643 points (100.0% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2173 readers
340 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 80 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Another fun one is when the Nazis built a Decoy Airfield to get the Allies to waste time destroying or capturing it as opposed to real high value operations. Due to inability to complete projects on time, a long running issue with the Nazis, the Allies had plenty of time to catch on to the ruse and dropped a single wooden bomb on it.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 weeks ago

I know funny and that is funny

[–] [email protected] 76 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Dressing up as the enemy is actually a war crime.

[–] [email protected] 103 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not back then it wouldn't be, though, if we take the veracity of the story at face value. The inclusion of perfidy (bad-faith deception, such as dressing up as a civilian or opposing force) as a banned act within the Geneva Conventions was only adopted in 1977, under articles 37 and 39 of Additional Protocol I.

Edit: And even today, Article 39 exempts naval engagements specifically from that provision when it comes to flying the wrong colors with intent to deceive.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a fashion crime if your enemy's the British Beefeaters.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

I think all military companies should keep their formal uniforms from whever time period they were formed. Imagine the photos from military banquets or 4th of July celebrations if one company is in WW2 era formal wear, another is Civil War, and another is from the Napoleonic era! It would be so cool to watch

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What? Committing war crimes? Germany? Preposterous!

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

WWI was so famous for everyone fighting a calm and reasonable war with no war crimes

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Reasonable amounts of condiments in the air

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They were serving so many hot dogs that they have to aerosolize the mustard.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

They were so progressive about women having a safe space to congregate they introduced a miles-long no-mans-land in France.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

To be fair: A lot of things that are war crimes today were declared as such specifically because of WWI. Meaning that they weren't war crimes when they were committed during the war. Specifically chemical agents (mustard gas and friends) had never been seen before, so there obviously was no treaty banning their use until after the fact.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

war crimes are whatever the dominate military power says it is the other guy is doing

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Only if you engage under the enemy's colors. Otherwise it's a ruse of war, and legitimate.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Then thank the British for stopping this potential war crime.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's war, and when you are being invaded by greedy bastards. There are no war crimes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought the Germans were the greedy bastards?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, in that case yes. But in current global situations.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If I'm not mistaken the Carmania was a civilian ship that the British outfit with weapons to protect convoys and the germans chose the Carmania because it was a civilian ship so it ended up being a battle between two "civilian" ships with hidden cannons.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Up until the end of WW2, it was quite common to requisition suitable civilian ships into the navy and outfit them as auxiliary cruisers. (often passenger liners due to their high speeds and long range) It wasn't uncommon for governments to subsidise suitable ships under the condition they were already built with preparations for such a conversion (mostly mounting points for a number of cruiser calibre guns).

Those auxiliary cruisers were then often put to use as convoy escorts and for commerce raiding, (Converted passenger ships being especially attractive in this capacity due to their capability of carrying extra personnel to use as prize crews to take over enemy shipping with useful cargo rather than sinking it) freeing up real warships for other tasks.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"the British seeing it's own ship coming at it" hurts my brain in so many ways. The wrong "it's". Using "it's" and "it" in relation to a plural formal noun. Could be fixed either by adding the word "navy" and using the correct "its" or by replacing "it's" and "it" with "their" and "them".

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't allow there mistakes too ruin you're day.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

He will turn blue any minute now..

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

If you want to know more the Drachnifel channel on YouTube has a good episode on it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

I'm getting Enemy Territory flashbacks...