this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
730 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

13563 readers
2784 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 163 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Like most phobias I think most people experience discomfort with this imagery but to really have a phobia it needs to be an unreasonable level of anxiety I think.

IDK why we have a hard wired aversion to these. It might be a vestigial response to some kind of predator or danger which is no longer relevant.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think that it disgusts me and makes me extremely uncomfortable. I would avoid it at all costs and I would probably freak out if I wound up unknowingly close to it. It is a weird type of fear. I can't explain why but my body will insist I stay far the hell away.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

These kinds of pictures remind me of some type of weird infection

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I think it signals severe ailment, like blisters, pox diseases, etc

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Woah what a coincidence! Same here!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Oh, you talking about bot flies?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't even understand what I was seeing and I started shivering instantly. Now feel a deep urge to scrub my skin with steel wool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Shouldn't this be: A Woodpecker Preparing for Winter? The order of words a in sentence, difference makes.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, sounds like a title to a recipe 😆

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I stuff my woodpecker's holes full of acorns before I gobble it up. Doesn't everyone?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

This IS the way. And of course the acorns must me soaked for 24 hours in salt water. Low and slow on the cooking, sous vid at 64C for 14-18 hours is considered ideal when preparing at seal level. Adjustments based on altitude may be necessary at mid-elevations below 2500m, and a definite necessity above that elevation. See attached chart, and citations.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps it's translated from another language. The whole thing seems a little stilted, so maybe.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, it implies that someone drilled 50,000 holes for acorns for a woodpecker.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Well i certainly know i do now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Acorn: this hole is meant for me!

[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Deutsche Democratischen Republik?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Dritte Deutsche Revolution?

Deutschland Dance Revolution?

Dance, Deutsche Republik?

Can't decide which one is funnier 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 weeks ago

i guess woodpeckers don't get trypophobia

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is amazing. I have a question though: How come only the author woodpecker can remove the acorns but not other woodpeckers? What kind of ID tech are these guys using?

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Since they don't have fingerprints they ID the pecker.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

They jam the acorn in hard enough that you have to break the acorn to get it out. If they put it in too small a hole, though, it breaks and rots. Too big a hole and they get taken.

EDIT: clearly didn't read closely enough. PBS says that woodpecker families run security on their stashes. So they basically just attack anybody who tries stealing. So I guess the ID tech is 'eyes'.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

'patrols and batons' classic

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Not only did you just repeat the information already given in the original post, but you didn’t even address the guys question you’re responding to.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Woops, you right. Didn't read carefully enough. I'll add the answer in an edit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

CMV: Trypophobia should be tagged as NSFW.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Genuine questions for the purpose of discussion: should photos of spiders also be marked as NSFW for arachnophobia? What other phobias should and shouldn't be considered in this?

I do not have any genuine phobias, so I concede that I'm speaking out of my limited knowledge coming only from years of solo and group therapy for other issues, but NSFW tags are intended to block images that you wouldn't want your boss (or mom, or general public) to see you looking at due to them being sexual or otherwise inappropriate. There are a lot of things that are going to trigger phobias and other very difficult feelings for a lot of people, but I don't think it's feasible to ask that everyone accommodate all possibilities when posting images or sharing stories. I think it's a positive thing to tag content warnings in bodies of text, for example, and at the same time I think that a person that can have an extreme reaction to what is otherwise an innocuous image due to a personal issue needs to take responsibility for it.

I hope this doesn't come across as minimizing the very real struggles that people with phobias have to deal with on a daily basis, and as a whole I support making public spaces more accessible.

ETA: my understanding of a phobia is having an irrational fear so severe that it causes very real and disruptive anxiety and panic upon being exposed to the phobia. If seeing an image like this causes you discomfort or unease, but doesn't really affect you severely or impact your life negatively, is that really a phobia?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I definitely think content warnings (not specifically "NSFW") are ideal for this. Sure, the line between what should and shouldn't be content-warned is blurry, and you don't need to go through every highly-specific issue someone might have with your post, but things like tripophobia (or arachnophobia) are pretty widely known so it makes sense to warn about it imo. Especially for image posts since you can't really just "not look at it" if it pops up in your feed.

And whether or not the warning is precisely about a "phobia" isn't relevant imo. It's just a nice thing to do, as it avoids causing others to feel suddenly itchy and uncomfortable for several minutes.

So no, I wouldn't tag spider images as NSFW, but I'd definitely add a "CW: spider" if Lemmy supported it 🙂

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Part of the problem is the lack of tools/functionality. Lemmy doesn't allow for hiding images without the NSFW tag. It could/should function a lot more like mastodon in some ways in our opinion, allowing both the user to hide all images in their settings and having more specific CWs that could hide even the post image behind.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

We have AI which is good at image recognition. Just use this little schmuck to add tags to posts and allow users to filter tags. Would also helo with Trump/Elon filtering etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Would love to have a wood pecker as a pet, but the last thing I need in my financial situation is another bill.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is making me feel queasy cos that tree makes me think of skin and the things in it zits.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

That's trypophobia . Don't Google it though, might come up with a lot of triggering pictures.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

This hole is mine!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

So you're saying if you're lost in the woods in winter, follow wood peckers to their food trees to get free ripe acorns?

Fantastic news.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, and then a bear comes and gorges on it. Every year, same bear, same tree, same woodpecker.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Absolutely nuts

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Trees going through puberty be like:

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments
view more: next ›