this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
660 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

67050 readers
6556 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 125 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This may in part be motivated by new guidance from NCAP, which will from next year require that all new cars have physical controls to earn the highest safety ratings.

https://www.evo.co.uk/car-technology/207666/buttons-could-replace-touch-controls-in-cars-thanks-to-new-euro-ncap-tests

Whatever the motivation though, I'm glad for it. Getting rid of buttons was always a dumb idea and I'm happy to see pushback.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 6 days ago

I guess they forgot to add air conditioning and volume to the list of vital controls...

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It wasn't dumb from corporate perspective, which is why they all gobbled it up like junky hoovering on piles of white dust.

You know how expensive it is to mold unique dedicated physical buttons for every function and then wire them all over the place? Or just slap single touch display and cram all the shit into that single display. You code it once and use it on all models. Corporates were already counting the money saved there. Until it backfired because everyone hated it, reviewers criticized it and now it's finally also criticized by safety agencies.

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cars cost way too much for me to care about this excuse.

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, but what about the value that saving money created for the shareholders?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You know how expensive it is to mold unique dedicated physical buttons for every function and then wire them all over the place?

Not expensive. You don't have to "wire them all over the place", you just put them on a PCB and connect them to the nearest CAN bus, or similar.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

They'd basically already be doing that for the touch screen, and may well be using similar controls under the hood, where the physical buttons send a command to the computer to do a thing, in lieu of a mechanical connection.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

One more connector, one more cable in harness, more coding, more cad time, more manufacturing time and more testing.

If it comes out to 20 dollars per car and you multiply it by 50000 a year for a relatively popular model there is a nice bonus for the ceo. Oh, and the price to consumer increases at the same time.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

If it comes out to 20 dollars per car and you multiply it by 50000 a year for a relatively popular model there is a nice bonus for the ceo.

Or you could just raise the price of the car by $20 since you've just added thousands in value?

I mean shit, let's take the seats out of the car! Bam! Just saved you billions, right? /s

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As well as the pure cost saving there was also the notion that it was a futuristic look that would sell, and so boost profits that way, too.

And probably it did sell and market well - for a while.

I feel that consumers had become too trusting of carmakers - after all, cars have been getting better and better in terms of their usability for decades, so when carmakers went touchscreen everything, the first instinct of the average consumer would be to trust it and assume it represented an improvement."They wouldn't do it if it was worse, right?"

And so people buy the fancy futuristic car with no buttons, and only after driving it for a month does it sink in how much they truly hate it, and that they got sold a lie.

So there was always going to be that one generation of touchscreen-everything, before the people who got burnt by it are now the ones thinking "I won't buy anything again that doesn't have some buttons!"

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Without actually knowing how much constructing the physical buttons cost, I would guess that the real savings are in process optimization - if all you have for the interface is a screen, then you don't need to have the interface design done before constructing the car - you can parallelize these tasks.

Insufficient as far as justifications go, but understandably lucrative.

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

You can even have that single display collect so much car user data and sell that too

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hyundai (motor group) and some time later VW group announced that they are bringing physical buttons back.

March of 2023

As it turns out though, sometimes the old ways are best. Hyundai certainly thinks so, as it has pledged to employ real physical buttons in products to come.

https://www.thedrive.com/news/hyundai-promises-to-keep-buttons-in-cars-because-touchscreen-controls-are-dangerous

December of 2023

https://insideevs.com/news/701296/vw-physical-controls-to-return/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 33 points 1 week ago

That's very positive.

[–] FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

That’s why I love brands like Hyundai. Never got rid of the knobs.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Honda as well.

Subaru went all in on the touch screen and it suuuuucked.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My uncle's outback looks like a video slot machine, and everything had to be done through the touchscreen. But to add insult to injury, the Subaru touchscreens are super slow and unresponsive, so they feel like they aren't working.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yep. And mazda has physical climate button/knobs, with a physical dial to control the infotainment (it's pretty convenient, if a bit of an older design on most of their vehicles).

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I consider it space-age. I haven't driven a non-Mazda that seemed as well thought out and functional. I wish I could rip one out and put it on my non-Mazda car. I breath a sigh of relief that my partner didn't buy the Honda with a long finicky touchstrip to control the volume instead of a knob.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DogEarBookmark@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago

Thats the reason they dont have me roped into payments right now

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I got in right before Subaru went that way and ended up with the best of both worlds: a touchscreen for CarPlay and knobs for...everything else. I still have knobs for the radio if need be.

Plus it's a six speed manual (Crosstrek).

I get a flyer from the dealership every other week asking if I want to "upgrade." Sorry, fellas, nothing you have is an upgrade to me. You can't get a manual gearbox here any more.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can’t get a manual gearbox here any more.

Huh, let's see why

Another factor contributing to the discontinuation of manual transmissions is the increasing emphasis on safety features and the integration of advanced driver-assist technologies.

Ew.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It's frustrating because "the consumer" doesn't want manuals, yet car makers add all these things that keep people from paying attention to the road making it - in my opinion - too easy to get distracted. I like that I can't hold my phone in my hand and drive because I need to shift.

Last summer I was in Ireland, and I was peeking in a few cars on parked on the side of the road just out of curiosity. Almost every one was a manual, it seemed like. It's not that we COULDN'T have fun, manual cars here. But Americans are lazy.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have a Hyundai ioniq 5 and it definitely has touch buttons for some of the things, like climate control.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago

Now, take out the bullshit that's tracking you and sending the information back to them to sell, and we'll be doing something great

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've never had this problem because I'm too poor to afford a car new enough to not have any buttons lmao

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same, I'm hoping "ol' reliable" will last another 200k-500k miles so I won't have to decide if I want to ride around in a privacy invading, poorly designed smart automobile, or if I'd rather just ride my bike everywhere. To be fair, my car is only around a decade old, but it's old enough to be missing most of the smart tech, and none of the car's functions tie in with the stereo.

[–] ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Definitely set aside a repair fund and watch YouTube videos on how to do maintenance and common repairs on your vehicle. If its Japanese, the motor and transmission should hold on. But you'll need brake rotors/pads, tie rods ends, struts, stabilizer links, etc. along the way. Its way cheaper if you buy your own parts and do it yourself. Good luck keeping your ol' reliable going!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not out of the goodness of their own hearts mind. It's probably more because Euro NCAP are going to be deducting score for not having physical essentials in 2026.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, this „news“ is from early to mid last year. Their designers simply took notes and realized touch screens suck for a vehicle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MisterMoo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Now get rid of the touch screen entirely. Mark my words, the first electric car unveiled as a totally analog experience will be incredibly popular.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's been a long time since I looked but I hope most cars still have physical buttons/controls for all important functions! Besides being easier and faster to use, without them if a touchscreen malfunctions (hardware or software) everything is gone and you wouldn't be able to drive the car. Then there's the tracking and spying, and sometimes bugs and UI changes after updates--and now ads!?# Cars are becoming as enshittified like everything else now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yarn@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Thank you!

I don't care what the reasoning is behind the decision (customer feedback vs. changes to safety ratings), I'm just glad it's happening and I hope all manufacturers follow suit.

This has been my gripe with new cars ever since I found myself needing one in 2022. Everything I looked at had a huge infotainment system front-ending climate and cabin controls. Want to turn your steering wheel heat off mid drive? Ha! Tap this specific spot on this screen 3 times and hope the car doesn't bounce while you're doing so or you'll accidentally turn something else on. Want to use voice controls? Joke's on you, they only work 50% of the time.

God forbid something happens to the control board (which costs thousands of dollars to replace if you're outside warranty), because then you're completely hosed.

You know what always worked without fail? The buttons in my 2005 Corolla.

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Even without the new EU regulations on this, I bet VW was already planning on doing this. The widespread backlash to the non-illuminated capacitive touch controls on the newest Golf GTIs/Rs was significant. I wouldn't have bought one of those, and a Golf R is basically my dream car.

[–] yarn@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I've been passing on a Golf R for the past 3 years for this exact reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Hopefully they can hit some middleground so we don't end up back in the crazy button-hell that cars used to be. Having a billion buttons is equally as bad as having none.

[–] JazzlikeDiamond558@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

I literally did not buy/straightout refused to buy new Golf because of this crap. It does not get simpler than that: other producer got my money, VW group did not. Period.

Volkswagen should be forbidden to produce anything. There were even touch-SLIDE commands on the steering wheel. God only knows how many lives were lost in accidents, because someone ''touched'' something and switched something off or on. Horrible.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Learning from Scout, which is also under the VW umbrella:

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I swear I‘ve read this headline like 4 times in the last month in this very community.

[–] WheelcharArtist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

would be nice seeing them doing it instead of talking about it

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I mean, that's step 1? It's not like they can do an instantaneous cutover, they'll need to figure out what's vital enough to deserve buttons, come up with a design/layout for that, find a supplier for them, get them in, start assembling the cars with them... Honestly they've probably already done a lot of that behind the scenes already before saying anything publicly. Point is, it's not like there's a button in the factory to start making cars with buttons instead.

[–] engene@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Thank you! Now bring back physical keys too!

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Aw, just when they were about to get rid of the steering wheel, shame.

[–] johannessmits@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Too bad, i liked the way it was going… in my experience 80% of the buttons are unnecessary, provided of course that the automation is well thought out .

[–] ileanallama@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

hoping the whole industry follows after, please subaru go back to the climate control buttons

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago
load more comments