this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1750 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

13859 readers
1087 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 168 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Confidently incorrect is the default with these people. I spend most of my time with family aggressively correcting misinformation about my field and related ones. They will die earlier thinking they know more because of Youtube. Getting them to stop taking bad health advice and mystery joint injections from a fucking chiropractor is the latest battle.

[–] [email protected] 103 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

The impression of legitimacy enjoyed by chiropractic is too damn high. I was well into my 20s before I ever heard a single word about it being pseudoscience. Walking around (usually on people's fucking spines) calling themselves doctors, I absolutely believed it was just some sub-variety of physiotherapy, which I guess is the point. In the whole universe of alternative medicine, I think that has to be the practice which has most effectively disguised itself as conventional medicine. It's gross.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was well into my 20s before I ever heard a single word about it being pseudoscience.

every fucking tv show and film referring to them as some sort of curer of back issues probably doesn't help

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I walked in to a chiropractors' office once to try and see if they'd take me for an appointment, found a brochure proudly proclaiming that chiropractic treatments can help cure autism and cancer, and turned right the fuck around and walked back out.

If you think you need a chiropractor you actually need a physical therapist and anyone trying to tell you otherwise is lying to you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I guess I should count myself lucky for where I grew up: there's a big/famous chiropractic school in this city, so this creepy motherfucker was on TV commercials all the time:

Never mind quackery; I thought it was legitimately some sort of cult!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 139 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (13 children)

Note how they always enshrine gender in biology, but then make all kinds of non-biological statements about what gender is.

"XX is woman"/"Large gametes is woman"/"can conceive is woman"

And then they'll say

"Women aren't as aggressive", "women are more emotional", "women like being in the home more", "those are women's clothes", etc.

The only reason it's so important for it to be biological is because of how it punishes gender non-conformity and makes the lives of trans people hell. Like it isn't ideologically consistent and they know that. They just don't care. If it was just about genitals or chromosomes, then why is it that gender dictates all these social things about us? The only reason to root gender in how you were born is to ensure gender roles are as rigid and immutable as possible.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

how it punishes ~~gender~~ non-conformity

Fit the mold or die. Always the same.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

To be fair, a Person with a PhD still can have Dunning-Kruger on other subjects.

Ben Carson is a great Neurosurgeon, but dumbass on politics.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

I think a lot of these XX XY "only two genders" people aren't just dunning Kruger, they're transphobic idiots with an agenda. So even if they had the science and knowledge it wouldn't matter because they're pushing their hateful stupid agenda, facts and logic be damned. They don't care, they just want to rationalize hating us trans people because we make them uncomfy.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would honestly be very surprised if any Republican politicians actually care about sex or gender. I think they're just evil and those are convenient issues to divide the working class. When you don't have popular policy in real issues, you need to make up some fake ones to get people to still support you.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago

The current moral panic about queer people is definitely manufactured, but the hatred that it's stirred up is still real. All the religious psychos in power (including Speaker of the House Mike Johnson) really believe that stuff and want to enforce their hierarchy.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Wait until they learn about XXY, XYY, and XO individuals.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There hugs AND kisses people?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago

I swear I was learning about extra X and Y in high school 20 years ago and that studies (at the time) were showing correlation between different traits displayed by effected people. Just that alone shows incredible gender fluidity.

So where we are, 20 years later, you’d think we’d have a better understanding within society but instead somehow it’s literally regressed since then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

While this is very funny, and definitely representative of a sort of ignorance/arrogance commonly found in ideologues - I recently learned that most people talking about the effect have, in fact, been Dunning-Krugering themselves.

Insightful video on the topic.

What most people expect the effect to look like:

What the actual results were:

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Fig 1 is a modified emotional change curve applied in learning and business settings. The term "Valley of Despair" is used in both concepts, and it's cool, memorable verbiage, but it shouldn't imply relation between Dunning-Kreuger and the change curve

https://forfengdesigns.com/tips-on-clawing-your-way-out-of-the-valley-of-despair-when-you-are-starting-a-new-business/

Image description: A modified emotional change curve from Evocon with Y-Axis being "attitude during change process" and X-Axis is time. There are 6 emotional phases described on this chart: 1. Neutral attitude, no knowledge; 2. Initial excitement, motivated; 3. Denial, indifferent, passive, apathy; 4. Resistance, frustration, doubt, anxiety (this phase falls below neutral and is described as "The Valley of Despair"); 5. Exploration, energized, small wins, creative; 6. Commitment, enthusiasm, problem solving, focus, team work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“It’s basic biology” mfs when advanced biology

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

it is basic biology, ie biology simplified to teach a kid in middle school. the thing is sciences don't stop at middle school level. a lot of university education is about clarifying that things you learned before were simplified to the point that they're practically useless if not outright wrong.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (13 children)

How do you know if someone has a PhD.?

They tell you

Never not true

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 weeks ago

I never tell people I have a PhD. It's rude, plus I don't have one.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago

Tbf, they kinda earned the right to brag.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago

I mean yeah, if you spent 5 years of your life pushing the edge of human understanding on a subject, and a shithead tells you to do the science on your research subject, it's relevant lol

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago

True, but I do think it was warranted in this case.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago

This is putting confirmation bias to the extreme.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well you don't know people with PhD that don't tell you they have one

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Yeah but science can be proven wrong an change over time, while my beliefs and biases are forever!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Can I get a T shirt that says “I have Dunning-Krueger and your Phd looks cute”? I just have a lot of BS to share and I don’t want to be sorry about it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You know how a bunch of villains are Dr. So-and-So? I bet it's dealing with morons talking about your area of expertise that leads to one's villain era.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I agree with Dr. Jey McCreight on the science.

But for determining truth, both sides are wrong here.

Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.

Many people with PhD's have had Dunning-Kruger. Someone else mentioned Ben Carson being great at neurosurgery, but not politics.

A PhD doesn't make you infallible.

I am saying this as someone who is taking graduate-level courses and will be pursuing my PhD. When I'm correct, it's not because my future PhD causes reality to magically conform to my opinions - it's because I rigorously looked at the evidence, logic, and formed my own conclusion that better aligns with reality.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

Can someone explain to me how some XX people become cis male?

[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XX_male_syndrome

tldr biology is dice rolls and humans are intersex for no reason sometimes

on a side note one of my friends had this and she only found out when she started transitioning. she is now a trans woman with XX chromosomes. i can only imagine how fucking vindicating it must have felt

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 weeks ago

De La Chappell syndrome, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, androgen exposure in utero, ovotesticular disorder of of sex development all result in a person with cis male characteristics and in some cases cis male typical genitalia despite having xx chromosomes

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 weeks ago

Gene expression is not as straightforward as people think. All sorts of weird shit can happen, and that's not even including gene mutations.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/assets/File/Pitch_sketch_final.png?w=2000

This is the best resource I've seen to show things relatively simply.

The TL;DR is that a whole "Y" chromosome isn't exactly responsible for "maleness", the SRY gene is. It's normally on the Y chromosome, but mutations can occur placing that gene onto the X chromosome. Inversely, someone could inherit a Y chromosome without that gene, in which case they would develop with female traits.

It's not considered trans because someone with 46XX plus the SRY gene would develop male genitalia, be identified as male at birth, and likely identify themselves as male. For some types of these conditions, there are plenty of people walking around with no clue that their chromosomes don't match their gender.

Disclaimer: I'm not a geneticist, so i could have explained something a little off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I googled it for you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XX_male_syndrome

In 90 percent of these individuals, the syndrome is caused by the Y chromosome's SRY gene, which triggers male reproductive development, being atypically included in the crossing over of genetic information that takes place between the pseudoautosomal regions of the X and Y chromosomes during meiosis in the father.[2][7] When the X with the SRY gene combines with a normal X from the mother during fertilization, the result is an XX genetic male. Less common are SRY-negative individuals, those who are genetically females, which can be caused by a mutation in an autosomal or X chromosomal gene.[2] The masculinization of XX males is variable.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

You've heard of xy people and xx people, but wait till you hear about X people!

Or xxx people, or xxy people, or... dies

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

People who see gender as a F or M binary in 2025 are willingly ignorant to the bone.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The phrase is funny but you wouldn't catch me dead wearing a logical fallacy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›