this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
428 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22046 readers
3733 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Color me surprised that the Democrats have as much blame for our current situation as the Republicans. Nobody, NOBODY, wanted to return to normal; they wanted real change and the best they got was state-sponsored financing for tech companies and unequal economic policies

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

I am pretty sick of the Democrats bullshit, but I’m even more sick of the Republicans bullshit.

I hate it here.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Libs be libbing

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow, so if true this implies that in the Democratic party even the women running for president has to do what the big man says. Hope this is false.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

It's definitely not false, it's the playbook all of the political giants have been running for very many years now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

My god! You mean they attached a bomb collar around her neck and said if she didn't comply they would detonate it?

Wait, they didn't do anything of the sort? Well, sounds like they didn't force her to do anything and the only thing stopping her from speaking out was her own spineless cowardice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

"Leadership"

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Or else what? Withdraw the nomination? (You can't withdraw a nomination lol)

Harris chose this

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Oh? Pulling a “Republican”? My wife made me do it? Wasn’t my fault? Attempting to distance herself so she can make a run for office again.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago

Yeah, seriously. She's an adult. She could have just said "Thanks Joe, now go away." What could he have done? Fired her?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Hillary was going to continue Obamas policies, more or less. its purely sexism why both female candidates never won, sprinkled a little racism.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Or, only people with certain beliefs have the backing/money to get to the top of a US political party.

They didn't win because their policies don't reflect the worker base.

[–] [email protected] 197 points 4 days ago (47 children)

Let's blame Joe so Kamala can run again.

Not fooling me, DNC. I smell what you're cooking.

load more comments (47 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

She is her own person and has to live with the consequences of her choices like everybody else. It's all in the past now and just a footnote in history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (19 children)

She was elected, not appointed. She could say and do what she wanted and theres not much Biden could have done about it.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 126 points 4 days ago (13 children)

To be honest, this is just a signal that she probably wouldn't have been a good leader. Better than Trump, sure, but that bar is so low it's a tripping hazard.

She should have told Biden to pound sand after locking up the nomination.

But we should verify the claim before passing judgement.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Honestly this behavior is going to keep getting highlighted from Biden because he was an absolute stubborn idiot. He had polling showing him losing to Trump with over 400 electoral votes for MONTHS before dropping out. He blamed his family for staying in as long as he did, obviously it was him or what was left of him.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 days ago (2 children)

History will not look kindly on Biden for fucking over his one job of stopping Trump. Didn't arrest him, didn't defeat him, didn't stop most of the Jan 6 protestors, didn't go after the enablers of his actions, didn't really stop anything Trump did to avoid debt and jail and we ended up with him for Round 2, Even Worse This Time.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago (4 children)

100% agreement. He should have arrested Agent Krasnov and his henchmen on the first day of his presidency, and detained them in isolation without bail or access to the media, until their trials were resolved. If he had done that, Krasnov and his Gang would be in prison right now, instead of the White House.

Instead Biden appointed a weakass Republican as his AG who gave him a 2 year head start to run out the clock.

The Dems had the perfect chance to defend our country from the MAGA scourge, but they totally abdicated their responsibility. It will be 100 times harder to take it back now, and I don't see it happening without violence.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If anyone wants some good rage material, watch the Pod Save America interview with Harris staffers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 3 days ago (11 children)

It's ridiculous to think that Harris couldn't have done what she wanted. Once you're named the nominee, that's it. They're not going to back out.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›