this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
1023 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

32982 readers
596 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And I thought they were supposed to be shying away from fossil fuels.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sfu@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Everyone acting like its okay to burn up teslas of uninvolved people because you disapprove of what Musk is doing. Then you should have no argument against pro-lifers burning down abortion clinics because they disapprove of what the doctors there are doing. Just saying.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Everyone acting like it's okay to throw eggs at billionaires' yachts because of wealth inequality. Then you should have no argument against rich kids throwing caviar at homeless shelters because they disapprove of being asked to share. Just saying.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

What an infinitely stupid response. The proportion of rich people owning a Tesla with respect to all Tesla owners is vanishingly small. When you burn a Tesla of an uninvolved person, you are costing them tens of thousands of currency and are probably destroying their only car.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Ah yes, the tragic wave of innocent Tesla owners having their daily drivers ritually torched by angry mobs. Definitely a real thing, definitely not just a few dealership lots going up in smoke under extremely convenient circumstances. Definitely not insurance fraud from a company that's hemorrhaging value and propped up by enough tax subsidies to fund a small nation. Let's all clutch our pearls and act like someone's grandma just lost her only ride to church. You good, or do you need a GoFundMe for your imagination?

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Their comment is still infinitly more humanistic than yours.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

What is a straw man argument?

I'll take Potent Potables for $800 Ken.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, burn them at the dealership instead!

[–] KatakiY@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Please dont. Find other ways to destroy them than fire if you want to, but fire endangers fighterfighters etc. Dont harm the working class to own the billionaires.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Counterpoint: fire

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

Sorry I cant hear you over me enjoying the sound of beautiful flames on Tesla. Gives me asmr tingles.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

One holds human beings in distress, and the other a garbage vehicle. Your comment is disgusting and shows how you value life.

[–] silverlose@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

I agree. It’s a false equivalency.

It’s super similar to the idea behind the original tea party. They didn’t do insane shit like burn down buildings with people inside, they tossed tea into the water. If we could do something similar, I’m sure we would.

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know what, the first time, I totally read your comment completely different than how you meant it. So my previous reply would have been different.

Even so, my comment was not disgusting, it was just using logic.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you know what? No, you obviously don't, and it's sad.

I wish that you would see the fallacy of your argument, but a cult of personality has you captured.

Empathy and reading a room are not some of your strengths.

Good day.

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Or maybe a cult of personality has you captured, preventing you from being able to see it from both sides point of view as I am doing.

You don't have to agree with the other side in order to see it from their perspective.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 159 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Tesla owners going from "Look at me!" to "Stop looking at me!" in the blink of an eye.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 59 points 4 days ago (12 children)

if i were looking to fuck with a Tesla, i'd pay close attention to any indication that the car was purchased recently. there are a LOT of people out there with a murder fetish, and i GUARANTEE that a lot of the nice new ones out there are really bait cars for gun owners that have been dying for a reason to shoot someone.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 37 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, probably a lot of Rittenhouse wannabes out there who wanna test the limits of castle doctrine.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago (18 children)

yes, but this is a whole new monster..

  1. someone shoots a person who's defacing their Cybertruck
  2. they're convicted of murder because it's proven they bought the vehicle specifically to bait a victim
  3. Trump pardons them

i defy you to tell me that this isn't INEVITABLE.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

Man I don't even think step two would happen before trump pardons them. The US is so fucked.

EDIT: As an example of what you said, a sociopath who has recently bought a Tesla is the fucking president of the US

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 24 points 3 days ago

I am so slow lately I saw this yesterday and only just now got the joke

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I thought this joke was going to be about all the cybertrucks needing towing because of yet another recall.

[–] Trees@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 67 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (12 children)

I know it's a joke, but many Tesla "solar" charging stations did actually use diesel generators a few years ago. Citation needed, but I can't be assed to look up the article.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 36 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Still more energy efficient than a regular ICE car.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Debatable, it depends on what fraction of the power was supplied by the generator. The chemical-kinetic-electric energy conversion incurs great losses because of waste heat, and portable diesel generators are not always built with efficiency in mind. A charging station operating on 100% diesel to power an EV is much less efficient than a modern ICE vehicle of a similar mass sans batteries.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 days ago (32 children)

A charging station operating on 100% diesel to power an EV is much less efficient than a modern ICE vehicle of a similar mass sans batteries.

Citation needed. Do ICE engines not get hot and therefore also have great losses because of waste heat?

Presumably a generator making electricity for a charging station would only run when electricity is needed, while an ICE engine would be losing energy to heat the entire time the vehicle is idling in traffic.

Why would a diesel generator not be made to efficient and why are ICE engines always made to be efficient? How do you know which kind of generator they were using? Why would they use the generator for 100% of the energy needed?

load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pro Tip, you don't need gasoline to burn Tesla just puncture there battery and it will go kaboom. /s

PS : THIS IS A JOKE DON'T EVER PUNCTURE A LITHIUM ION BATTERY IT IS VERY DANGEROUS

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

PPS: ICE cars exploding in flames when shot is a Hollywood myth. Not so much for EVS.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 24 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Let's focus on the nazi leader also not only his old projects

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 31 points 4 days ago

His stock in Tesla is leveraged for a lot of other things he does. Lowering the stock value could cripple him financially.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Run Tesla stock prices into the ground. It's legal and, short of criminal violence, it would damage Elon worse than anything else. Without his money, Elmo Muskrat would just be the guy at the end of a dive bar you avoid because all they talk about is government conspiracies to cover up the fact that Lizard People Aliens are making human lizard people hybrids.

load more comments (2 replies)

por que no los dos?

I think for the first time in my life I'm okay with cars burning extra fuel needlessly

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Actually burning Teslas is bad for the environment.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

just me playing arsonist's advocate here:

what if the burned tesla prevents two more from being sold? how does that compare to the impact of that lithium mining?

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 days ago

Good counterpoint. I don't know

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago

Drop in the bucket compared to what enabling this billionaire shit bag is going to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Teslas don't run on gasoline.

It runs on them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago
[–] Mandelbrot@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago
load more comments