this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
425 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

11018 readers
493 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This was the third such referendum in Paris in as many years, following a 2023 vote that approved a ban on e-scooters, and a decision last year to triple parking charges for large SUVs.

The referendum will eliminate 10,000 more parking spots in Paris, adding to the 10,000 removed since 2020. The city's two million residents will be consulted on which streets will become pedestrian areas.

Paris town hall data shows car traffic in the city has more than halved since the Socialists took power in the capital at the turn of the century.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 40 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Holy, Paris is based

This was the third such referendum in Paris in as many years, following a 2023 vote that approved a ban on e-scooters, and a decision last year to triple parking charges for large SUVs.

Banning e-scooters is dumb because they replace cars, but the triple parking charges for large SUVs is amazing

The 500 additional streets to be pedestrianised will bring the total number of these so-called "green lungs" to nearly 700, just over one-tenth of the capital's streets.

So based.

[–] Kuinox@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

the e-scooters are not banned, the free sharing one are.
The problem is that the company doing free sharing did not penalized user enough for parking their e-scooters improperly (in the middle of the sidewalk).
Because of the uncivility of the users, they banned it.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

The SUV parking-fee hike is almost comically punitive - the calculation is a bit complicated but it can reach €225 for six hours

PS: Why are people downvoting this? Are people here really so fragile and hypersensitive that they have to stamp on the slightest suspicion of dissidence from the One Approved Opinion? This was a completely neutral observation and FWIW I APPROVE of the fee. Jeez. Get a life, people

[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

other poster downvote other poster must detect enemies ME HATE ENEMIES me also downvote

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Haha that's exactly it

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

Good, we don't actually want !orphancrushing@lemmy.world

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yep, banning e-scooters is a stupid idea that no one has been able to explain properly to me.

They only ever talk about "annoying kids go too fast where they shouldn't" without realising ANNOYING KIDS WILL ANNOY YOU NO MATTER WHAT.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

It is only about the (masses of) shared ones. Which end up everywhere in every orientation, including rivers etc. And those companies simply do not care. People suck because they do not put them back and the companies suck because they let that happen.

[–] griff@lemmings.world 29 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Making city streets & sidewalks safer & more accessible for humans on foot, in chairs, on self-powered & electrical wheels rather than allowing the dominance of polluting larger vehicles—what will those crazy Frenchies think of next??

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm honestly jealous.

I live in a very walkable area of Kansas City, but it would be even better if there were fewer streets and more green space instead, but we Americans with our cars and our fat asses would never approve of something like this.

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Guillotining the bougeoisie?

Voltaire invented most forms of "woke" in Paris a few hundred years a head of time.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

10,000 more parking spots in Paris, adding to the 10,000 removed since 2020

Wow!!! My city won't even consider removing a dozen parking spots to make room for a bidirectional bike lane on a street that already has on street parking and two large parking garages within sight... sigh.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Adding back the word "eliminate" would make the quote more understandable.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Paris apartment prices must be prohibitive, but man I would love to live there!

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

While I celebrate this as a victory.

4% participation rate in this referendum? We should take a look at the state of politics. That’s a scary low number.

[–] Foreigner@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is not terribly unusual for a municipal referendum vote on Paris. The SUV vote had just under 6% turnout, the electric scooter vote had about 7.5%.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is a referendum vote. Turnout for major elections is higher.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, still. 4% is ridiculously low.

Even switzerland which has referendums every couple months never dips below 30%.

I would be concerned at the lack of engagement in local politics.

But I remember people were accusing Hidalgo of underrinforming about these referendums and only making awareness campaigns towards those they thought would vote in her favour.