this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
129 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

32124 readers
575 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I absolutely love wiki walking through random obscure fan wikis, but I hate how most are on Fandom.

I think a federated wiki solution makes sense. I could see it as an evolution of the interwiki concept.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thanks for linking my project. Im happy to answer questions about it. Also here you can find the git repo.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This looks interesting.

Seems like it's still early days yet, but are there plans to add things like namespaces and categories?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

For now my focus is to make it federate with Lemmy and the rest of the Fediverse. But you're welcome to open an issue for that kind of feature.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This looks very awesome. So it also functions as a redundant wiki?

Wikipedia should use it. Then others can create their own wikis, which keep a version of articles of Wikipedia.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its similar to Lemmy in many ways, so like Lemmy posts are redundantly mirrored across instances, the same is true for Ibis articles.

Getting Wikipedia federated would be great, but it will take a long time for Ibis to be ready for that scale.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can ibis import a full Wikipedia backup?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

There is an API so you could write a script to import any kind of data.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

It wouod be amazing to see Ibis take off and pick up more developers

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

This is the answer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Seems like there is a federated solution for everything lol

There's also a list of ActivityPub software on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub#Software_using_ActivityPub

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nah... Missing IMHO:

  • Strava like
  • IMDB like
  • stackoverflow like
  • google maps review like
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Strava like: FitTrackee and Endurain are planning to implement ActivityPub so yah there's gonna to be one IMDB like: NeoDB and LibRate Not sure about the rest

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

thank you! I will keep an eye on those

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also:

  • gift economy/trading platform (e.g. like freecycle)
  • buying/selling (e.g. like ebay)
  • local community/bioregionalism networks (e.g. what nextdoor should be)

These seem kind of ideal for a federated network, IMO.

I actually think Lemmy would be a pretty decent format for something stackoverflow like - just maybe needs to UI tweaks to minimise the visual space that replies take up, plus maybe answered post flair

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Thanks, I saw that flohmakrt link in another comment too. Excellent!

Does that yrpri site work well?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What benefit would federating it bring?

The ability to self-host your own FOSS wiki already exists and has for over two decades. It's called MediaWiki.

You could have federated accounts I guess but do editors on the Doctor Who wiki really need the ability to see posts on Mastadon or edit pages on the That 70's Wiki?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Discovery. The current state of google dooms such small wikis. They will have zero traffic. Google has been overtaken by AI slop, so if we want to be relevant, we have no choice but to federate

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In addition to discoverability, I'd say it provides a happy medium between letting every rando with an IP address edit a page and requiring account creation. Part of the point of the fediverse is to have (almost) everything in one place under a single account while still keeping things decentralized.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate on "discoverability"? Finding individual subject wikis has never been a particular problem for me. Even ones that don't use Fandom, provided they are at least active. Just googling " wikia" (I know. I can't let it go) always gets me what I need.

Can't say I see an advantage to universal accounts (I see more disadvantages), but if that's the big selling point and people really want it. I'm not opposed to having it, i've just always treated it as a mild novelty I never use.

As for decentralization, it has already been solved by MediaWiki. Which is GPL and (can be) self-hosted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On Lemmy you can see (and search) a list of all the activity from every instance federated to your home instance. Looking at Ibis, which a few posters have mentioned on this thread, it has a discover page with a list of federated instances and articles on those instances. The current format is hardly scalable, but it's a start.

But, as I said before, the issue is less about discoverability and more about editing. Just like I can post in this thread even though I'm on a different instance, you can edit an article on one instance even though you're on another. The alternative as used by Wikipedia, is to allow anyone, account or not, to edit. Requiring someone to have an account on a federated instance would mitigate a fair amount of spam and ease moderation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Requiring someone to have an account on a federated instance would mitigate a fair amount of spam and ease moderation.

What would that solve that mandating accounts for a standard wiki wouldn't?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

It's not federated by any means, but if you want to replace FANDOM wikis with other equivalents, Indie Wiki Buddy is a great extension to have on hand.

https://getindie.wiki/

There's options to remove FANDOM from search results in favour of other options, and they also allow you to redirect to the Breezewiki frontend for FANDOM to get rid of all those shitty ads and UI, which is legal considering the contents of FANDOM pages are still under the Commons.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hubzilla (macroblogging service in the Fediverse) can also be used to create and collaborate on wikis.

I can only find a German-language manual for this right away: https://help.hubzilla.hu/benutzerhandbuch/wikis.html

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Hubzilla is pretty amazing and has a ton of potential, unfortunately hasn't really taken off at all.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I've had this thought before, but have also wondered whether it's even possible to implement this using ActivityPub, considering that a wiki inherently requires having the same state everywhere, but ActivityPub allows instances to ban and defederate how they like (thus become desynchronized from each other).

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I see, thanks. Will look into that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm not thinking of a single distributed wiki, but something more like Fandom where you can edit pages on other wikis that are federated to yours.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound like a federated wiki but more like federated account management.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, people tend to mistake "federated" for "open alternative" 🤷

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Sounds like single sign-on (SSO). Which is practically everywhere these days.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I mean most fandom I have seen have more than one wiki as there is more than one wiki company.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that could definitely be cool.

Cost would be a big factor ... Fandom got big by being free and eventually replaced (or heavily customized) mediawiki to the point it's unrecognizable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hosting a wiki isn't that expensive it's basically texts and some lightweight pictures. The whole english wikipedia is around 109GB of data.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That doesn’t include images. Images are stored on wikimedia commons, which is about 600 TB.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, with Kiwix I was able to download the whole english wikipedia with mid-res pictures on my 128GB USB Drive. I think the 600TB you're talking about includes videos and high-res pictures.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I used gitit for a while. It's git backed and you can propagate it around that way.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's not federated, but something like BookStack could be an option for self-hosted collaboration.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Easy hosting isn't quite the issue. Dokuwiki is trivial to self host. What I'd like something that's a happy medium between requiring account creation to edit pages and letting literally every rando with an IP address go to town.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if it could be done with a MediaWiki plugin, given how extensible MW and its plugin system is

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't doubt it, though MW seems hard to manage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

It's not that bad once you get the hang of it, especially using a wiki farm like http://www.miraheze.org/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Or maybe Miraheze but it doesn't sem federated either

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

This is another example of the type of thing it would be great for conventions and clubs and such to host.