this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
825 points (100.0% liked)

The Onion

5887 readers
977 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 149 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

What a burn. By also: what the hell is moxie still doing on xitter? I mean I know he does not like federation, but he could use bluesky, you know...

[–] [email protected] 53 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds good to me. Just like Sun Java and their "not to be used to operate a nuclear facility" clause.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What? If that's true then why do they have AtomicBoolean?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That is such a bad take. You will want an AtomicLong to at least be able to measure the damage. This is not a black and white (true or false) situation!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

3.6 Roentgen. Not great, not terrible.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

In other news, Signal now protects its users by moderating any illegal content ..

.. oh wait, it's end to end encrypted .. so no .. it cannot.

(Said with fingers crossed whilst holding breath)

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I trust open source more than I do something like WhatsApp that is owned by Meta/Facebook. The source code is on Github and I assume if there ware any concerns we would know about it. Also there's safety numbers.

You can breath now 😊

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How do you know the source code on GitHub is what is being ran in production?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

For Android they have reproducible builds to verify that they are using the source code from their public repo for the app distributed via Google's Play Store.

Regarding the server software, it's not that easy but because of the Signal protocol you can be sure that messages are e2e encrypted and authenticated. They also have the sealed sender feature which hides the identity of the sender. So it shouldn't really matter what software a server is using.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well you can still 'moderate' if the ends choose to be open.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

And you can ban identified bad users

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What are you trying to say here? It sounds like your against end to end encryption?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

The opposite. End to end encryption is what's preventing moderation.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

If this was not the timeline I live in, I would laugh myself unconscious at that title.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago

Changelog titled "Added 'don't be a dick' rule to ToS"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

“You have been banned for conducting an unauthorized airstrike. If you have reason to appeal this ban, please message the moderators within 3 days.”

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Great move.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

They should have added, in really small font, "For that you must use 4chan."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Who reads the TOUs anyway?