Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Rips, slams, shreds, incinerates... I'm sick of these headlines.
Seriously, it's just right-wing exploitative language. And yet, it's the same left-leaning outlets repeating it again and again.
I wish there were more bold takedowns and real accountability, but it's all so watered down now. Less like a pile driver and more like a sternly worded memo.
It also serves to dismantle and pacify any possibility of actual opposition growing a pair. When just saying something is "ripping" someone, it has the effect of making it seem like something that is actually effective is being done. When the cult does it, it works for them because it is intended to build cults of ideology that oppose reality by appealing to egos, but they also call for their base to mobilize in ways that are effective. Here, people and politicians just don't want to face doing what would be effective, so they just add stronger language for their usual fallback.
Imagine if the American revolution had been about people just waiting for the British parliament and King George III to roll over with peaceful protests while they waited. The side with the gullible personality cult is the one getting mobilized and radicalized while the opposition is pacified with the illusion that due process will suddenly materialize again and that everyone will acknowledge how right they were.
All these headlines make the relative pacifism that is happening seem like activism that is being effective. People need to realize how bad things are going to feel bad enough to do something about it, not be told that just pointing out "that's bad!" is ripping anyone a new one just because it comes from another mouthpiece. There's nothing wrong with the news getting out or pointing out how bad it is, it's the language that suggests that more is being done against it than actually is.
Couldn't agree more. On YouTube I'm particularly sick of MeidasTouch, not just because of this exploitative use of headlines but because their sponsors are usually equally bad gimmicks.
Since 2015 or so....
I understand the issue. It's clear. What I don't understand is this article focusing on Ocasio-Cortez's "by the light of day" comment.
Are people watching these proceedings live on C-Span with their hand on the phone ready to call their congressperson's office? If Republicans pushed this through "during the light of day," would it make any actual difference? Why can't congresspersons challenge this in the middle of the night? Does Ocasio-Cortez think Republican constituents will be making those calls to change the minds of their politicians? 🤔
Why aren't they? It's their medicaid benefits.
I think you are overestimating just how much constituents are invested in what their politicians actually do...
Many many many persons feel the side effects, the burn, of their elected politicians deviating from what they hoped. And yet each election cycle, these politicians continue to be voted in.
I mean, they get mad, but mad enough to watch C-Span and make calls...? 😅
I guess but it has been many years of them feeling the burn from their own party. Can't tell if any of them are waking up or not.
Honestly, they're not.
I hate to say it, but the system needs to crash and burn for people to wake up. I need and want to avoid that at all costs, but some people... most people... don't seem to be able to learn without it.
Republican voters are way more engaged than Democrat or progressive voters. Any day of the week.
It's why they have so much more content, content creators and social media presence. They put in the work. But not just put in the work. They target specific areas that are effective for either changing public opinion or applying pressure to government to get their issue across.
They put in the work because the oligarchs are aligned with them, so they have a basically unlimited firehose of money to pay people to shill for them.
Meanwhile, leftists have to rely on volunteer labor.
This is classic language to pacify you, to make you think someone is out there speaking and a fighting on your behalf.
They're literally attacking Medicare? Don't worry AOC is putting the GOP in their place, she's SLAMMING them and ripping them a new one!
If my representatives fought this proposal, calling them does no good.
So how do we find out if our reps approved of it? Those are the reps that need to be replaced. I feel like there's no easy way to find out whether my reps approved of a prop
sLaMmEd
I’m surprised there’s no “slammed” community on the fediverse that just focuses on instances of “slamming” mentioned in the media.
They pulled the sneaky crap all the time especially whenever they get themselves raises. It’s always done at like two or 3 o’clock in the morning on some bill that gets past.
AOC recently voted in favour of an ADL supported definition of "anti-semitism".
So I'm sorry but whatever leftwing sounding stuff she says has to be assumed to be purely theatre, same as when the DNC assholes claim to care about workers, the poor or minorities.
You can't be a Leftwinger and support ethno-Fascists like the Zionists at the same time, so one has to conclude from her own actions that AOC's "leftwing character" is purelly performative and basically the ideology-free business strategy of crafting an image that differentiates oneself from the competition whilst not in fact being any different.
Whomever is the inheritor of Bernie's politics, it ain't her.
I am getting real sick and tired of fake-leftist concern trolls pushing bad-faith purity test rhetoric.
Agree 100% She’s one of the few who take no money from AIPAC. This might be bot activity?
And this is why Dems lose elections - Republicans fall in line, Democrats fall in love.
The MAGAs will back anybody with an R, even if they are pedophiles, while a Dems will only vote for a candidate whose every single issue lines up perfectly to their individual demands. If not, they either don't vote at all, or they vote for an impossible 3rd party candidate whose positions line up even less, but at least they aren't a Dem.
I've been an Unaffiliated Independent since I first registered to vote in 1977. I've NEVER voted for a candidate I've liked. EVERY single vote I've made was the lesser of two evils. Frankly, as an independent who takes positions on both sides of the spectrum, depending on the issue, or often takes a nuanced position in the grey area in between, I doubt there ever could be a candidate who lines up perfectly for me.
AOC isn't evil because her position on Gaza isn't exactly what you want. We've seen and heard enough of her to understand that she's a rare example among politicians: someone with authentic principles and morals, and motivated to fight hard for working Americans. She's still worth following because at least we know that overall, she'll be working for positive change for all Americans, and not just a tiny demographic.
We can't make Perfect the enemy of positive change
Fuck this is so incredibly everything.
I like to think the very thing that makes people vote left is the exact same thing that sabotages the left. We critically think ourselves into an uncompromising stalemate.
She's consistently voted against of sending weapons to Israel, she attempted to block the sale of arms to Israel before October 7th, and she's called what's happening in Gaza a genocide on the House floor. I can count on one hand the number of House/Senate Democrats that have a record like that. She signed on to a mostly symbolic resolution rather than give her enemies ammunition by voting against, "Condemning the global rise of antisemitism and calling upon countries and international bodies to counter antisemitism." I get not liking the IHRA definition of antisemitism, but please, get some fucking perspective.
The ADL is redefining anti-semitism to mean anti-Zionism.
Criticism of Israel is not the same as intolerance of Jewish people. I would think identifying Jewish people with the actions of a rogue genocidal state is pretty anti-Semitic.