Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
They don't care AFTER a crime has been committed either. Every time I tried to report my bike stolen (happened a lot, unfortunately) they just laughed at me for wasting their time.
The one time I needed them for an intervention they showed up very late, obviously against their will and were downright belligerent (I was the victim of a crime, they barely registered it).
ACAB, no exceptions.
A bike? I had the same reaction trying to report my car stolen. Not worth their time. They couldn’t even cross reference their own data - a couple weeks later I was ticketed for abandoning my stripped car and charged for towing and storage fees. Reporting my car stolen was just an income source to them and I had to keep paying so it wouldn’t keep adding up
My friend had his bike stolen. He insisted on filing a police report even though the cops were clearly annoyed and straight up told him it was pointless. A couple months later he saw his bike chained up on the main street in his neighborhood. There were 2 cops out on the street so he approached them and explained the situation. One laughed at him and said, "What do you want us to do about it?" The other told him he would have to provide proof that that specific bike was his and that it wasn't just the same brand which is basically impossible.
Then he said, "We won't be here much longer. Just go buy some bolt cutters and steal it back."
Fuck the cops but ngl that last bit of advice kinda slaps
If there's a fight, they arrest the victim and let the assailant go free. Then charge the victim with "assault with a deadly weapon".
Source: Happened to me. I was thinking Motherfucker, I don't got no weapon, fuck off. Charges were all dropped.
I used to roll my eyes when Redditors posted anti-police sentiment, I thought they were just being edgy. Turn out they were right.
Some people don't understand until they've been victimized.
Thanks for sharing this experience.
People think I'm being dramatic when I say a police officer can choose to ruin your whole life, and the lives of your friends and family, just because they feel like it.
Nobody should have that kind of power.
I used to roll my eyes when Redditors posted anti-police sentiment, I thought they were just being edgy. Turn out they were right.
Glad you recognize the problem.
I was pretty "cops are kinda okay" to full blown ACAB after this story, where a my neighbor, a man in a wheelchair, was shot 9 times in the back of the head because Ryan Remington has a trigger finger.
9 times. In the back. 60 yo man in a wheelchair. And Ryan Remington is still Scott free.
It's not about preventing crime
The rich break laws constantly, with no consequences
The police are there to make sure that those who aren't wealthy enough to be insulated from the consequences of their actions know their place
Take it a step back...the root cause of most crime (or at least non-white-collar property crime) is social and economic inequality, which is now and has forever been driven by the wealthy ruling class.
Rich people cause all the crime.
My ex husband called the police on me two years ago because he wanted to kick me out and move in his new concubine.
When they showed up, they told me I could either go to jail or a mental institution, that I had to leave the house I was currently paying bills on.
They have denied that they did this, and refused to provide me a police report. I had zero protections in my divorce. The fact that I was evicted from my house meant that I did not have the documentation of the physical and mental abuse that I needed for court. Not that it mattered anyway, because my ex drained my bank account a few weeks later and made it impossible to get a lawyer.
Supporting male dominance is part of their real job.
Crime prevention does indeed start with social programs. But it doesn't end there. I'm all for defunding the police and I do agree that in the US police is really out of hand, but let's not be naive here. Social programs aren't going to address organized crime, or crimes of passion, crimes of immaturity (tenagers are both immature hormone soups and capable of causing harm) or political extremism. Antisocial behaviours can appear even in the socialistest of the welfarest of the welfare states.
Not to mention that cops have at the very least also the role of maintaining order, which is different from preventing crime. Think traffic cops, or rowdy crowd marshalling, or stopping disorderly conduct in public, or (extreme example) breaking up the mob that wants to lynch the alleged pedophile, to make sure he gets due process.
I'm all for a profound overhaul of policing, and for deep changes to what first responders are called for what emergency, but, honestly there exist functions for which police is useful.
Police somewhat deter crime, sometimes. Sometimes they prevent a crime from being worse. For example, they race to a crime in progress and try to stop it if it is still going on.
I don't think you could have a successful society without laws, and you need someone to enforce those laws. But, the modern US police force is so far from what you'd want if you were designing things from the ground up.
Cops do not like confronting actual criminals - criminals are dangerous. But they love to intimidate and force total acquiescence from regular people and excuse it by saying 'its what we have to do 'in case' they are a criminal'.
Once criminals figure out that cops don't want to confront them, those criminals learn to accommodate that. So they get worse. They figure out who they can rob and intimidate with impunity - and it's mostly the poor. But also, they can break into middle class people's cars, porch pirate, even B&E into homes, and cops don't want to deal with that. So many people post on reddit bc cops won't do a thing if, for example, a disabled person has their motorized wheelchair stollen, so people try to play detective on their own. Have a stalker or an ex who has credibly threatened your life? That might only help them catch that person if you are actually murdered.
Cops deter crime in wealthy areas, but the rest of us are on our own.
Fear of being caught might deter the naive from testing if they can get away with shit, but in reality, there is essentially a truce between cops and criminals, and if you know how to be too much work and risk to bother catching, a lot of what we consider 'criminals' don't have a lot to worry about.
They also escalate crime. By a lot.
Welfare checks. Minor incidents. Petty theft.
Suddenly it's a dead guy.
This is saying police aren't the answer to solving all crime and that the need for them would be greatly reduced if a society were to look after it's people instead of leaving them to wallow in misery and strife. It's not anti police to say that at all. Police are misused in many societies as a tool for all situations and then teach them only how to be a hammer.
I realise I may be pissing into the wind here, but people don't typically stop at one crime. If you catch the person who did it, that stops them from carrying on doing crimes.
Of course, social programs also help.
Is this fact or feeling?
People I know that work with criminals attest that the vast majority of crimes are opportunistic encounters by ordinary people and “career criminality” is rare.
Of course “I know people who say” isn’t much fact either but it’s more then nothing.
It's definitely not fact. In fact, the Prison Industrial Complex causes MORE crime than doing literally nothing would, let alone actually investing in amelioration of the root causes.
Yeah yeah I know, ACAB and everything.
Police don't just show up, they walk around. At least in non-police states like the US.
And wherever they walk around, crime is prevented. Because a robber isn't going to snatch a purse when a police is looking right at them. A drug dealer isn't going to sell drugs in front of the police station. And people drive slower and don't go into a road rage when the police is riding close by.
So no, police does prevent crimes.
If they are only preventing opportunity, the crime will just take place at a different place or time when an officer is not present. The program's mentioned are aimed at reducing the motive for crime, which applies at all places and times.
It creates marginalized and crime hubs too. Police chooses to be present somewhere (where there's a perceived interest) and chooses not to somewhere else. Also crime is not viewed equally among the different spheres of society and police just creates its own type of systemic violence in relation to that.
The police are worse than useless. They exist to generate revenue for themselves, and they occasionally murder people.
Never call the pigs unless you want to see you or your loved ones executed or enslaved. Call family, friends, or neighbors you trust before you call the pigs. Develop mutual aid networks BEFORE you need them.
"Mom, I know your intentions are good, but aren't the Police the protective force that maintains the status quo for the wealthy elite? Don't you think we ought to attack the roots of social problems instead of jamming people into overcrowded prisons?”
“Look, Lisa! It's McGriff the Crime Dog! Hello Lisa! Help me bite crime! Ruff ruff!”
The Simpsons
I actually disagree, because they're a deterrant. "They show up after it happens" is an argument that could be applied to any deterrant, so it's obviously a bad argument. Police are a problem for other reasons than that they literally don't prevent any crime.
They're not a very good one considering how they have a very poor case closure rate for serious violent crimes, and the state and federal justice systems of the US are disturbingly okay with false convictions and excessive retribution.
It's a bit disingenuous to pretend police and punishment in general are not a deterrent. Yes, reducing police has shown to reduce crime for some time in certain case studies, but not removing them.
however, just like the severity of punishment, after a point the more police you have see diminishing returns, and in serious over policing cases you start to get more crime because they start looking for reasons to hand out fines and smaller charges to justify/fund their job. However, prosperity reduces the amount of crime more than anything, in a given population.
There one area where they can actually prevent/decrease crime. Let's say of all the crimes the police currently commit, they decided (hypothetically) to hold themselves accountable and stop doing those crimes. That would have a direct effect on the police crime rate.
God damnit I still remember this, and I'm in my late 40's
Scruff, McGruff, Chicago Illinois, 60652
Mentally ill, non-violent, habitual drug user here. I can attest that, regardless of my moral condemnation of policing, a good 60 percent of my encounters with police have contained abuse, incompetence, or gross misconduct.
Oh, and I'm a white man with blue eyes, and 5'1".
Sometimes they invent crimes that didn't happen. You could say they're creating crime.
I've been saying it for forever, happy people don't do crime.
I call bullshit.
Are you going to speed up when you see a cop car?
No, but it doesn't mean I'll never speed again as soon as im out of their view. I'd say at best they delayed a crime from happening. But I get how that has its legitimate usefulness too.
Folks temporarily slow down until they're gone. Which causes traffic jams and accidents.
There's a fair amount of research that suggests more police equals less crime. It's not just the number of police officers that impacts crime rates, but it is absolutely a variable according to most criminologists.
Huh, there's a fair amount of evidence that police are criminals. It not just the number of police that drive up stats, but the lack of accountability.
ACAB.
