this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
341 points (100.0% liked)

News

30806 readers
3216 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sucks for all decent people, but Israel wanted this and America is their bully so...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's funny that you think America isn't pulling the strings from the start.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's little difference between the two at this point. They are intertwined. Fuck both administrations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Trunk & Netanyahu teaming up for Operation Jailbreak against Iran

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump's only on board because he thought it was Operation Jailbait

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The people that oppress women and gay people? Good for those people? Jesus, dude... Fuck you.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Get off your stupid high horse, America doesn't get to bomb and decide who gets to be president. In fact, America is opressing people of colour right now so lets bomb them?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I think he was talking about Iran, but I can see why you thought the GOP

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was told we didn't start a war.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh right uh...hang on...it's just like....hostilities?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

I heard it was a special military operation, only meant to last 3 days.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Butbutbut... Trump said NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!!!! How can this be???

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Sned in the Kardashian with the Pepsi can

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

BUt i pAINtEd PeACe SiGnS oN OUR BunK3R bUSTers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Reports indicate it was a muted response to indicate an intention to deescalate. They had to do something but they didn't go crazy. We'll see, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I heard they fired six missiles - the same amount the US used - intentionally. Targeted non-civilian locations. Weren’t complete dicks about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Same thing when trump assassinated soleimani. They rattle a saber a little bit and call it even. Trump announced a ceasefire agreement 3 hours ago so it looks like business as usual.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Evidently it's an imaginary ceasefire agreement and nobody even asked Iran, so... We'll see. The token retaliation suggests they aren't trying to escalate with the US specifically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Totally expected. What would be unexpected is firing at the country itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

How could the Iranian's do such a thing! Won’t someone please think of poor Israel who shot first, or the idiotic American president who just wants to drop a nuke to satisfy his ego.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

Why not attack the U.S. directly? There are plenty of coastal bases in the U.S.

I feel like it would hurt a whole lot more if they were to go after something on U.S. soil...not that I exactly want that. Being bombed at home sounds terrifying.

Im just curious what the logic was behind this.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Even if they wanted to, how would they accomplish that?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

They do technically have orbital launch capability, which implies they in theory have the capacity to construct an ICBM, even if not with a nuclear warhead necessarily. Granted, the results of such a strike almost certainly would not be worth the costs to them so I've no expectation they'll do such a thing, but they probably could if they wanted to badly enough.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Perhaps because if they did that, there’s a very high chance trump would nuke them. He’s been itching for a reason to use nukes since his first term, and that would give him the excuse he wants.

e: I think the fact I got 2 opposing comments (he’d do it without justification and he’d be stopped by the CoC even with justification) might be telling here. He’s a monkey with a machine gun, and who knows if justification would work on others in the chain of command? Perhaps they’d rather not risk that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If Trump wants to nuke them, he nukes them. He doesn't need a reason, he is a demented megalomaniac with a cult following. There will be some more finger-waggling in congress and pearl clutching for the midterms after the fact and that's it. So why appease him or try not to upset him?

Iran probably just thought hitting these targets was easier.

I fucking hate the world we live in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This seems performative. Only a handful of missiles and apparently Iranian state TV is reporting successful strikes, but I can't find anything reputable that confirms that. Sounds like all missiles were intercepted. Iran gets to show their people that they've responded without risking a true escalation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That would make sense. I guess from my point of view, I'd be pretty pissed if I was Iran right now. At least 9 of their nuclear scientists were assassinated last week, and now their nuclear sites have been all bombed. That's as good of a declaration of war as youre going to get. But I can understand why they wouldn't want to wage an all put war if they dont think they're prepared for one.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

There's no way they come out on top in an all-out war with the US. Terrorists working unofficially are their best best. Not like there's any lack of people who (justifiably) hate the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

You are getting downvoted but i agree with you its obvious they dont really try to hurt the US.

Even the missiles they did fire, ALL of them were intercepted by US missile defence and not a single person was hurt.

Its just to show that they hit back a little symbolically.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because these are short to medium range ground fired missiles? They don’t reach that far. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t think they have submarines that can get close and fire missiles at the United States proper.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I have no idea. They have a nuclear program, so I assumed they have a somewhat sophisticated and modern military.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

They have OIL.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

That's a bad assumption, North Korea has nukes.

It's just a bigger stick.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There will be a "terrorist" attack in the near future. The something with guns during a crowded event. My money is on a 4th of July event shooting. Sadly that's the only way Iran and other poor nations have to fight back. Until Iran and poor nations get nukes they will be taken advantage of. I'm pro Iran nukes simple because them not having them is obviously not working for anyone

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

The ONLY good point to this would be that it would draw the US public into action. A base in the Middle East got hit? People shrug it off, it's nothing new and doesn't affect them. A naval or army base on the East Coast gets a missile hit? At least if there was disagreement on what to do, we'd be arguing about it. Assuming that Iran can even get that far...

And to be clear, it's only a good point in that it would wake people up that shit isn't right, and maybe they'd feel threatened enough for their own welfare to do something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Fear. And a lot more difficult to successfully hit.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

So far, reports state “fired at” but come up short of saying “hit”.

Sounds like air defenses may have intercepted all of them? At least to the extent we can trust reporting at this stage.

ngl, it’d be more satisfying to read about a successful counterstrike…

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Here we go again…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I did say it wasn't going to be chill over there for very long.

load more comments
view more: next ›