this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
594 points (100.0% liked)

News

30527 readers
2801 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman plans to bankroll a New York City mayoral campaign, arguing that his affluent associates are poised to flood the election with money in an effort to defeat Democratic Socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani.

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Arguing that his own support of President Trump would automatically disqualify anyone Ackman might put forward, the activist investor said he was making a public appeal: Anyone capable of taking down Mamdani in the Nov. 4 election should step forward and volunteer.

“Importantly, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time,” he wrote.

“So if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in.”

It’s unclear whether New Yorkers would honor such a candidate. The recent intervention by Elon Musk in Wisconsin’s state supreme court election indicated the voting public does not always respond well to billionaires using their money to sway races.

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

A large influx of New Yorkers heading to the voting booth because they are as concerned as Ackman could easily affect the outcome. If Cuomo can hold on to enough fundraisers, political pundits also point out, it’s possible he could run as an independent like Adams, splitting the left vote and spoiling the race.

Ackman, however, argued all these factors would support the emergence of a centrist candidate looking to position themself on the national stage. It could even be another businessman like Bloomberg, he suggested, although Ackman in an earlier post appeared to indicate he would not seek to run himself.

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 hour ago

This won't cause the exodus of the wealthy. It will cause an exodus of the greedy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 49 minutes ago

I'll do it! Pay me, Billiam!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 hours ago

Lots of articles say that Ackman is a real bloodthirty piece of crap, a famously petty crybully, and a supremecist. So I can see why he'd be against Zohran Mamdani.

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/crybullyism-bill-ackman-ruling-class/ https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/bill-ackman-war-harvard-mit-dei-claudine-gay.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzkY3NA_ZkQ

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago

Whenever I see anything like this I remember my days working for large American companies and how difficult it was, even as a senior engineer, to get spending approval for anything. Like, even a $20 replacement headset I had to keep resubmitting applications for for three weeks because the managers had a policy of rejecting every first request on the theory that if it was important enough to spend company money on, it was important enough to fill in the form twice.

The point being, these sorts of people do not hand out a single penny without running the numbers and realising that the cost of rigging an election multiplied by the probability of success, is still lower than what they'll financially gain from it going a certain way.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 hours ago

I can beat him, money pleaseeeeeee

Mona Lisa from Parks and Recreation asking her father for money.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This is just blatant corruption

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

System working as designed. You see, Russia and China are the real problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

They are real problems

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago

Always follow the money. Why are GOP and billionaires afraid and against this man who pledges to help the poor and struggling working class? Because they obviously have an interest in keeping the poor and struggling in the status quo conditions in which they live.

If helping the poor didn't hurt their bottom line, they wouldn't pay to keep it from happening.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 hours ago

So the TV pundits are calling this "class warfare", right?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 13 hours ago

These guys were the first against the wall, come the revolution.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I remember the last time it was run. It's why we got president Bloomberg. Oh wait. Why would he actually reference Bloomberg himself whilst suggesting this? Did he just forget exactly how badly this worked?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago

bill isnt a thoughtful boy

[–] [email protected] 48 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Ackman is also a part owner of X, and that platform will also definitely be a big part of an effort to defeat Mamdani.

Edit: a family member just asked me what I think of Mamdani wanting to put a tax on all hiring, saying he proposed a 35% tax on the salary of all new hires. I googled this, and the only results are on X. The fix is in.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

35% tax on salary is fine with universal healthcare, child care, education, housing, and food. I would give you 50% rates for that.

People think this is a scare tactic but that is what people want. Instead most pay 22%-24% anf can't afford any of the above things.

https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/taxes/federal-income-tax-brackets

[–] [email protected] 2 points 46 minutes ago

IS he promising universal housing and food? Big if true.

Estonians pay a nearly 50% tax on salaries, we get universal healthcare and education, but not the other stuff you listed. Would definitely be way happier if we got that. Happier than a couple of euros more post-tax salary could make me.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy

Is that a promise? Look dude I'm already sold on him, you don't need to keep selling him

[–] [email protected] 28 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That is what they always claim, don't they? You can't tax the rich, they'll leave!!

Cool.

Where?

Where will they leave to? Europe? Good luck, taxes are way higher there (not enough , though) either way, you'll be gone from what made you rich in the first place. You're not going anywhere

[–] [email protected] 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Florida. We have no income tax, an increasing population of millionaires, mosquitos, alligators and homeless people.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 18 hours ago

Ohh! What's not to like? 😵‍💫

[–] [email protected] 40 points 21 hours ago

What a crook.

Literally buying elected officials.

A true enemy of the people

[–] [email protected] 27 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I have no clue what Mamdani ideas for NYC are, but if this pile of crap is against him, that signals to me that Mamdani has principles. Bill Ackerman will only support candidates that he can corrupt.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Free daycare, free public transit, and city-owned grocery stores. Sounds like a dream to me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Those are the types of things that would encourage people to have kids, then get back into the workforce. Conservatives can't even do what's needed to obtain their goals.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

No give! Only take!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 19 hours ago

Billionaires trying to buy elections

[–] [email protected] 14 points 18 hours ago

There's really no excuse for this

[–] [email protected] 28 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I'm really liking how this race is shaping up. Adams is refusing to drop out because, well, he can't; the second he loses power he stops being useful to the Trump administration, and then he's vulnerable to prosecution. Cuomo is also staying in because he's a narcissist, and Ackman is willing to throw money at anyone else who wants to run.

So that means the centrist shit-libs and conservative ghouls are splitting their vote between at least two, probably three candidates, while the progressive vote will go entirely to Mamdani. I'm still wary of DNC fuckery, but so far, so good.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Is the NYC Mayor General also ranked choice? Vote splitting is less impactful with ranked choice.

Still, it would be nice to see what a democratic socialist executive can do with NYC.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Great question, IT IS NOT! Only the NYC primaries and special elections are ranked choice, but the general elections are still first-past-the-post! So Cuomo and Adams will most certainly hurt each other if they both refuse to drop out!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

Hopefully, the DNC won't do something stupid (e.g. support someone other than Mamdani).

[–] [email protected] 13 points 20 hours ago

And it's all because he's ~~a dirty democrat~~ ~~a dirty muslim~~ ~a dirty ~socialist~~ will let poor people be less poor and rich people be a little less rich

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Fucking seriously.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Schroedinger's billionaires. They're propping up the economy with all the tax they pay, but they'll leave if they have to pay tax.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Those rich people aren't going anywhere. Theres not another New York City. They're not gonna pack up their factories and offices with datacenters and move them elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Remember when Bloomberg tried running for president for like 2 weeks?

Somehow I expect similar effect, burning cash without budging almost anyone.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bill Ackman is evil and actively harming the NY and US economy. He wants people to become poorer year after year, until they can't spend on consumption anymore, and that will cripple the economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›