this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
565 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

17067 readers
639 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not as concerned with this as I am with the fascism, because this will at least kill us indiscriminately

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

My friend, this is part of the fascism.

[–] [email protected] 201 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Just when I'm about to retire, Medicare will only cover chiropractors and horse paste.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"You appear sickly. It's because one of your humors are imbalanced. Have some bleach in your veins and get some fresh air to reduce the miasma."

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Have you tried suntanning your asshole?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Only if I can help Gwyneth Paltrow steam-clean her Gua Chakra.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Aaaand thoughts and prayers!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 175 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Kennedy is a germ-theory denier who believes people can maintain their health not by relying on evidence-based medicine, such as vaccines, but by clean living and eating

I fucking hate this timeline

[–] [email protected] 89 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Clean eating, like park bear and whale carcasses!

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein 39 points 3 days ago

Don't forget to bathe in raw sewage.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No wonder he got that brainworm.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He used to pop the eye balls out of birds heads and eat them raw

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)
  1. fucking why?
  2. how did you learn this abomination?
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

He's a sick bastard.

There's a three part Behind the Bastards on him that covers his childhood, young adult, and current craziness. I found part two the most interesting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Even if he believed that, why isn’t he calling for more regulation oversight for the FDA and stringent quality controls on the food production supply chain as a whole?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago

Because like everyone in Trump's government, he is there to gut, cripple, and undermine the public's trust in our institutions.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Clean living in his view just means focusing on "natural" things. Which means swimming and drinking shit water is safe, but anything "artificial" is dangerous. So he's certainly not going to care about pathogens in the food supply, because he doesn't believe they are dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

he in fact believes pathogens in the food supply are necessary to build your immune system

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is all going to be covered by a snarky longform YouTube (or equivalent) documentary in 200 years.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

"Why do we live in an underground bunker - 21st history channel"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago

Well at least we know which publication refused to capitulate to morons.

I wonder which ones they kept.

[–] [email protected] 115 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I mean, correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t Nature and its subject-specific varieties considered some of the most reputable and prestigious scientific publications?

[–] [email protected] 89 points 3 days ago (17 children)

Yeah, getting published in Nature is a career gold star achievement. They’re very high impact (meaning many other scientific papers cite their articles).

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago

If we go by impact factor (a measure of how often the articles a journal publishes are cited elsewhere), various Nature publications are six of the top ten journals in the world and Nature itself is 15th

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

Yes. It's pretty much the definition of a high quality peer-reviewed journal.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 days ago

The US is like a reality tv show, except it's less believable.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Did they just hear the term junk science and went "no u"?

This administration is so fucking frustrating, but it seems they want to remove any meaning of that word, the same way they always do.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Did they just hear the term junk science and went "no u"?

That's EXACTLY what they did, yeah. Just like when they appropriated "fake news" which was originally a term describing their own disinformation.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Which also nicely mirrors the Nazis calling everybody that contradicts them Lügenpresse.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

That's not new though, Stalin and Hitler both played the fake news game.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Nah, John Stossel was using it back in the '90s to deny climate change. The term "junk science" has always been used as an excuse to ignore reality.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"precious tax payers money shouldn't go to unused subscriptions to junk science"

Ahh yes, but it should be used to make the incomprehensibly wealthy, even more wealthy. I really wish there was a god.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There must be (or ought to be) a term for this type of conspiracy that requires practically all experienced professionals in a given field to be complicit.

You could convince me that one or even a group of researchers were acting with nefarious intent, but everyone? It's just an absurdity.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's pretty much the definition of the "grand conspiracy theory". It requires the combined effort of thousands of people across hundreds of countries. It's insanity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Very much like a Protocols of the Elders of Zion theme, but with educated scientists rather than jews

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

It's just a repeat of that AIDS conspiracy group that rejected evidence on HIV and made their own "science" mag which folded when everyone died of AIDS

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago

So the modern approach to healthcare is back to leeches and blood letting huh. Did not have that on my 2025 bingo card but in retrospect I really should have.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Damn, what a bad ~~week~~ ~~month~~ ~~decade~~ century for US healthcare!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Was there a good ~~week~~ ~~month~~ ~~decade~~ century for US healthcare?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

They're probably already in the data set of whichever LLM they use to write their policy documents anyway, so sure, fine. 🙄

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

Everybody knows that real science is peerless.

load more comments
view more: next ›