this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
284 points (97.0% liked)

Reddit

20276 readers
216 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryan@the.coolest.zone 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like the Fediverse hasn't yet reached the Eternal September moment, and I'm happy for that. A smaller footprint means we get to have our own culture.

On the other hand, even though it means losing this culture, I would like to see greater general adoption of the fediverse and decentralized social media in general. Sure, there will likely be some big-name domains serving fediverse instances, the same way email is primarily served by Gmail et al, but anyone should be able to spin up their own instance and interact as well. I don't believe Internet communication should be locked behind various walled gardens, and people should re-acclimatize themselves to a version of the Internet where anyone can host and contribute.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jwing@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

And yet, all those bigger bubbles were once 1.5 million large at one point. You have to start somewhere.

[–] Whiskeyomega@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mastodon has 13 million.
Not sure where you got the stat for Fediverse as a whole on that.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

https://fediverse.observer/stats
Probably using the monthly active users.

13mil seems to be total users.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does look like Mastodon has around 9 million itself, that's a nice size. It also makes this graph wrong.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

9 million is total user accounts. Not monthly active user accounts. Facebook has 3 billion monthly active user accounts. The chart is showing active monthly user accounts.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 22 points 1 year ago

We are small but cooler than the other ones

[–] syd@lemy.lol 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

LinkedIn 930m? More than both Reddit and Twitter. I don’t believe this.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd wager the majority of them are dead/inactive accounts. I remember graduating from undergrad and thinking I had to make a LinkedIn account to get a job, used it for maybe 45 minutes, and never touched it again. I feel like this is the case with a lot of people

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm suprised as well. But it says monthly active users. So I'm guessing they count distinct logins per month, which a dead account can't do. I'd guess it's probably bots looking for keywords and building profiles for recruiters.

[–] fernandorincon@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Never use it if not applying for jobs or recruiting

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's only 30 million users, the other 900 million are recruiters.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Nearly 1/6th of the earth’s population are recruiters.

Do you know 6 people? One of them could be a recruiter

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YouTube is vulnerable due to their low payouts and high ad insertion. You’d think someone like Amazon would be trying to steal some of that huge market share with a competing service.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Amazon doesn't want to start a division that's essentially guaranteed to be unprofitable for the foreseeable future

[–] sugarcake@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm gonna have to ask for a source on that...

[–] ColonelSanders@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I work for Amazon corporate. I can emphatically agree that right now, and for the past few post-COVID years, Amazon's only obsession is near term quarterly profits for stakeholders by any means necessary. To hell with long term investments. They are slowly sabotaging themselves internally with a lot of unpopular and frankly idiotic and nonsensical decisions that will ultimately result in cascading failure after failure. The enshittification continues.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you want me to prove a negative, I can't do that.

Youtube isn't profitable. Youtube has never been profitable. Frankly that's incredibly unlikely to change. Amazon isn't going to try to break into a space that is unprofitable, would require a monumental effort to actually draw creators (since just offering big creators money clearly didn't work, see mixer or anyone else), and requires astronomical amounts of data storage even for AWS. They're especially not going to do that when they just spent the last however many years watching multiple people do a much smaller task, take on twitch (again, mixer and the like), with zero success.

Would I love to see a not completely awful proper alternative to Youtube? Yes. It's that going to come from Amazon? No. And no, peertube isn't the answer either, and won't be unless there's an easy path to monetization for existing creators and data storage magically becomes free

Not to mention, Amazon already owns multiple online video services with Prime Video and Twitch. The intersection of those two already cover a bunch of those bases, so you're talking about standing up an entirely new unprofitable service that needs it's own monolithic infrastructure and will end up competing with your own services, in order to try to take a third slice away from YouTube.

It's just no where near worth it. If you think Amazon has any business competing with YouTube, you don't understand A) how the market works B) how much of a technical undertaking that is C) how much lift it would take to get a reasonable number of creators to keep the platform active D) how financially unviable the product is. Even one of those on its own would be a serious dissuasion from doing so, but there are many reasons not to do this.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Amazon already has an ad sales division through FreeVee. They also already have the storage infrastructure. It would probably be a good fit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Impressive. Very nice. Let's see it without bots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As someone posted, this is straight up wrong. Why would you source wikipedia? https://fediverse.observer/stats

  • Mastodon is almost 9 million/month
  • Lemmy is a little over 2 million/month
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

of which 1.1M are alien[.]top bots mirroring shit from reddit

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  • you can block them
  • Reddit is mirroring a shit ton of stuff from twitter, youtube, etc.
  • All social media has a lot of bots, I'm betting there are a lot less here because we're not on many people's radars yet.
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What you say is true, but the person you replied to has a point. That site has nearly as many accounts as the rest of Lemmy combined, and most of the sites those bot users post to hardly leave any room for genuine discussion from real Lemmy users. You won't get a reply from any user registered to alien.top. It's basically Reddit with a coat of paint.

To me it's a misrepresentation to include alien.top users as part of Lemmy's userbase.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dang. I thought Twitter was bigger than Reddit for some reason.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You can thank Elmo for that 🤣

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltnotsugar@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m actually surprised by how large the fediverse is. I thought it was more like 50,000 at most.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's even a wrong stat, there's 13 million, monthly active users.

[–] PuddingFeeling907@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good to see we’re not that smol

[–] Karlos_Cantana@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

And yet Facebook is the one platform I use the least often. I just don't see the appeal, let alone why I'd ever give a flying crap about what other people are doing. I only have a facebook page because my other family members use it to post and keep in touch.

But we have /u/stamets so the rest is moot.

load more comments