this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
335 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

68639 readers
3350 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
335
Superconductor Breakthrough Findings Replicated, Twice, in Preliminary Testing - Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 2 years ago by CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The fact that this has been replicated is amazing!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] transporteraccident1@lemm.ee 57 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you want to see all the conflicting findings and by-the-minute updates, this post is great: https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/claims-of-room-temperature-and-ambient-pressure-superconductor.1106083/page-11?post=94266395

I'm very much not an expert, but my read of this is: most replication efforts have mostly failed when it comes to making a working room temp superconductor (meaning conducts electricity with no resistance). However, groups are increasingly seeing some of the other characteristics expected from superconductors, and it appears that the failures might just be caused by using an unrefined technique.

So time will tell, but this is probably a big advance, but not itself a world changer just yet.

[–] ngwoo@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

It's at least reassuring it wasn't just a hoax this time.

[–] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

wikipedia has a nice little table on all ongoing research as well.

Here

[–] T156@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

Although it is worth noting that one of these attempts is just in computer simulation.

The Berkeley lab hasn't confirmed their results against a physical sample.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Heres my analysis of what all has actually happened from a similar post with this article yesterday

From reading through the article and it's sources, here's what seems to be the case:

  • a simulation at Berkely National Labs with their supercomputing capabilities has verified that LK-99 theoretically has superconducting properties

  • Argonne National Labs also seems to be involved and doing stuff, but nothing official from them yet, besides maybe helping with simulation stuff

  • a Russian scientist is working on improving the synthesis process and has made some low purity samples that produce the Messnier effect, but higher purity than the original I think. It's all from Twitter (x) threads and a little hard to follow. Her handle is @iris_IGB

  • China National Lab (Shenyang) first principles analysis suggest gold and silver doping LK-99 will make superconductors as well. [Directly copied from article]

  • Under the guidance of Professor Chang Haixin, postdoctoral Wu Hao and doctoral student Yang Li of the School of Materials Science and Technology of Huazhong University of Science and Technology they have successfully verified and synthesized the LK-99 crystal. It can be magnetically levitated for the first time and this is shown on a bilibili video. They expect to realize the true sense of non-contact superconducting magnetic levitation. [Also Directly copied from article]

Direct source for last 2 points and also more info in general

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/07/tracking-lk-99-superconductor-replication-efforts.html

I would give LK-99 a 95 percent chance of either being a true rook temperature superconductor or directly leading to the discovery of a true rook temp superconductor in the next few years.

A few caveats however: according to the simulation, the conductive pathways only forms when the copper bonds to a specific higher-energy spot in the crystal, so getting higher purities will likely need a fair amount of innovation on the production process. There are some other complications with the synthesis, so even if it is fully and properly confirmed with more papers and such it will still likely be a while before it can start to be used effectively.

[–] Smokeless7048@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yea, even if LK-99 is a room temp super conductor, i dont it expect to be THE room temp super conductor... but it will prove its possible, and provide pathways to improve it (either advancing LK-99, or showing how altering a material to introduce internal strain can cause it in other compounds)

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The proof of concept alone will get so much money this way, i'm betting that we'll have either 3, 7, or 358 promising compounds or materials in a year or 3! Im getting cautiously optimistic here :-)

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

What argonne ends up saying will have huge weight for me. Hope to hear them chime in.

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

A practical superconductor is a huge deal, it would drastically change the way we deal with electrical power distribution and electromechanical applications. So any development is going to be big news. Though we're not talking about an actual working conductor, it's just excitement over research advancement, yeah? I've seen this kind of "big news" before in other tech sectors and time often proves it unworthy. If it does present a big step toward a practical superconductor that's great, but I wouldn't count any eggs yet.

[–] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I would say this is likely not a practical super conductor... But it may well be the first ever room temperature super conductor.

The first semi-conductors were not practical either, but we can all see where that led!

[–] Event_Horizon5@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

but we can all see where that led!

It led to the LED!

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would say this is likely not a practical super conductor… But it may well be the first ever room temperature super conductor.

Yes of course it would be a big deal if they create one to begin with. However if it's difficult and expensive to produce, that's not much help. It has to be mass producible and inexpensive to have industrial significance. I mean we already have expensive solutions. Don't need any more of those.

The first semi-conductors were not practical either, but we can all see where that led!

I don't know that semiconductors are a good parallel. Growing the crystals dates back to the early 1900s and was never an expensive or technologically difficult process. Doping silicon to create devices like diodes and transistors was something new, but was not exceedingly expensive or a great technological challenge. The migration to chips which require lithographic doping was more of a challenge.

In any case semiconductor devices were practical shortly after development. One of the first consumer products that used them was the "transistor radio" which was inexpensive and came out shortly after invention of the technology.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago

The benefits of a room temp super conductor mean that it would be produced at scale for price points well above standard. It's that big a deal in performance improvement.

The paper's method is fairly messy, low yield, and brand new... But it's also not that complex of metallurgy afaik. I would not be surprised to see iterations on method that scale well.

Regardless: if it's true then it proves it's possible... Which wasn't guaranteed until now.

[–] ashar@infosec.pub 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is unexpected.

[–] Overzeetop@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

But welcome, indeed.

[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Where were you, the day that everything changed? This is likely it, folks. If this pans out, it'll be jetpacks and mimosas on the Moon, Jetsons' style. Holy shit. We thought the computer age was something, this is going to be Something Else

[–] LazaroFilm@artemis.camp 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Where was I? On the toilet.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Sat in my chair, waiting for Baldur's Gate 3 to drop

[–] Ragerist@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Maybe, there's still important questions. Will it scale? Preliminary tests only transfered mA's before the super conductivity breaks down. So can you layer the material to get higher amps? Will cables have to be made in one continuous part or will the super conductivity work across joined cables

[–] meisme@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

This material likely isn't it but it demonstrates that room temp superconductors exist

[–] Konman72@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I feel like I've seen enough to say that this is likely real and you are probably correct. I'm struggling to figure out how to prepare for this though. Are there companies or industries that we should be investing in or something?

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I have been doing some thinking and this is game changing but not so much. We won't get hoverboards or flying cars to my knowledge. We will get much cheaper maglev trains, but in America we refuse to build public infrastructure that isn't for cars so that isn't gonna fix it.

We won't get faster traditional computers because those need semi-conductors. There are some patents and theories about superconducting transistors so we may get a "cool running" cpu eventually, but it won't be faster it just won't heat up.

Quantum computers will get cheaper and maybe more available, but they are still a research topic so we are probably decades away from them having practical use (or ever in terms of practical for everyday use, they will break encryption as we know it though).

We will "instantly" save something like 30% of our power generation that is lost to heat, but again that is going to require a massive infrastructure project to replace all high voltage power lines, so that is never going to happen in America.

Brush less motors will be able to be smaller and/or able to take in more energy so they will be more efficient, but we are still beholden to our energy storage density.

There is a theoretical idea of using superconducting rings to let electrons flow around it indefinitely, as an energy storage medium, but I have no idea how close that could be or how dense that would be compared to Lithium Ion batteries, or Fossil fuels which is the real competition.

We will get smaller and cheaper MRI's so medical imaging should get cheaper and more available to the "global south".

Am I missing anything?

[–] mild_deviation@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

I thought heat is the main thing limiting computer performance? Like, if we had superconducting transistors that take little energy to change state, highly parallel tasks that are power-limited today would get a whole lot faster. Think native 4k path tracing-level graphics in games on our phones. And better/faster/cheaper AI systems, though they are limited more by memory than by compute, so they'd likely still be run in the cloud mostly.

[–] Wereduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

More heat efficient processors and more energy efficient processors are one and the same. Which is huge. Energy usage is a large portion of the cost of computational infrastructure, and things like training neural networks. I suspect a thermally more efficient processor would also potentially last much longer too, with less intense thermal cycling.

A lot of data centers are limited by the energy infrastructure where they are constructed.

[–] Adeptfuckup@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hitch your tits and pucker up. We’re entering a new age of industry. Much like the original Industrial Revolution, technology is going to advance at an extremely rapid pace. Fusion, quantum computing supremacy. Just… wow. How far off is general AI with this new room temperature superconductor?

[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fusion is no closer than ever before, and AGI is hilariously over hyped. Also no closer than ever before.

[–] Proweruser@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And Fusion is pretty close to begin with. Commonwealth Fusion is well within their purpose time table so far. They don't need any new superconductors for their project.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Stupid question probably - is computing power what is holding back general AI? I've not heard that.

[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

What's holding back AGI is a complete lack of progress toward anything like intelligence. What we have now isn't intelligent, it's multi-variable probability.

[–] knotthatone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Simply throwing computing power at the existing models won't get us general AI. It will let us develop bigger and more complex models, but there's no guarantee that'll get us closer to the real thing.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

So a supercomputer simulation and a video from a team in China...

I'm no more skeptical but I'm certainly not sold yet.

[–] bull500@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's wild 😵‍💫

load more comments