Why would one unuse Arch btw?
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
913 points (100.0% liked)
linuxmemes
24335 readers
420 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
3. Post Linux-related content
sudo in Windows.4. No recent reposts
5. π¬π§ Language/ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ/Sprache
6. (NEW!) Regarding public figures
We all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Arch is only the larval stage. When a Linuxite consumes enough CLI, they metamorphose into one of two adult forms: a Void user, or a NixOS user. As these two adult forms are incompatible, this is a rare case of species divergence within a life cycle. Even more oddly, like the axolotl, many Arch users never leave the larval stage, and continue living comfortably in their ecological niche.
Wow, this is so well explained, I'm making it my personal copypasta!
load more comments
(8 replies)
Switching to nixos?
As someone who switched to nixos - eh. So much hacking to make dev stuff work really kills the magic that nixos is supposed to be :|
Yeah, it is a lot of initial work, but once you got your shell.nix or flake.nix in place it is really nice, to not have to deal with different dependencies and versions in different projects.
But you can also archive the same on any distro with the nix package manager.
except i want my computer to function for my needs without "a lot of initial work"
It's an investment for the next time you install on a new dev machine. After install, I will literally run a single command to return to the exact state of my dev environment.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
i dunno wanting an os that actually just works without a lot of setup?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Look at the community where it was posted.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I think with inflation a picture is only worth 700 words.
S6E4 Game Changers dropped literally yesterday and you wasted no time recycling the joke
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
We get it, you used arch. You donβt need to write a thousand words telling us.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I used to run Arch, btw
I use mint, btw.
(β¦Not really but it fits the joke the best. I have used it and itβs an excellent distro whether you are a beginner or just want something stable and full featured. )
Mint is such a pragmatic distro. Honestly I admire people who are just happy with their Mint and don't feel the need to distro hop to ever more esoteric package ecosystems just to feel alive
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Yeah, it's obvious a jealous Manjaro user stole that dude's sticker...
Edit: almost forgot... I use arch btw...
Became straight
I don't see what the problem is with Arch Linux and why it gets so much flak. I am not a Linux expert by any measure, but I use EndeavourOS and find it really use to use (don't ask me to install from scratch). Its extremely stable and I like the fact that it gets updated constantly.
The only other distro I really liked is MX Linux. My main gripe was that I don't want to reinstall every so many years. I want to set up an OS and just use it without worrying about it being a temporary thing. But maybe I'll change my mind in the future.
I'm not for or against any distro really, maybe except Ubuntu and its bloat. I just use what best suits me, which is the whole point of all the different distros.
Manjaro is truly the worst distro of all time and probably helps give arch a bad name
Oracle Linux exists
load more comments
(4 replies)
i think its just people taking the "i use arch btw" meme too seriously and thinking its bad to show or even use it all
load more comments
(3 replies)
I've used arch on one machine now, am a total noob to it, and I really like it. I see what people are raving about and I see no reason to shit on it. I don't really care if 6 years ago some people were annoying about it
load more comments
(12 replies)
I couldn't figure out how to make the wifi on my Debian machine reliable so I replaced the default wifi manager front-end and backend with iwctl, the same thing Arch uses by default. It seems to be working but now I have an unholy abomination of Debian spliced with Arch DNA.
Every distro is an unholy abomination made by plugging the maintainers' favorite parts together
A simple fix is to replace the rest of Debian with Arch.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I was asked what I think of the distro "Arch btw" since everyone recommends it. Gold.
artix my beloved
!btw
What dist to you use btw?
NixOS, it has a lot of the same pain points as Arch, even steeper learning curve for installation and configuration. And lose support for even more software titles.
If it's not 1995 slackware difficult I don't want it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Arch is a pain to setup BTW. It's worth it, though you'd be better using something like the installer for cachyOS to get the same experience
I'm partial to Endeavor OS personally. It's basically just Arch without the bullshit of setting it up.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)