Foofighter

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We had 84ish% participation US had 64%ish(?) Additionally we had 29% for conservatives, which would be the people in the US voting rep eventhough they would not admit to directly supporting Trump. The gap is smaller than it seems, though plurality in the political system (multiple parties, not winner takes it all) relaxes the situation quite a bit.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Musk is a symptom! Trump is the elected guy responsible for the actions of his "employee". Get him out and fix the nation!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Truly a man ahead of his time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Reading the description already is more likely though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Might be a 4 pin M8 plug (sensor /actor cable) given the size. I think xlr is larger.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (11 children)

My Chrystal ball says that Elon keeps realizing agenda 2025 until the resistance within their own ranks becomes unbearable. While Elon makes news Trump makes legislation to fuck over whoever he can. Only then, goat Elon gets scaped by savior Donald to appease Maga and everything is in shambles.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you expect that an AI provides a morally framed view on current events that meet your morally framed point of view?

The answer provides a concise overview on the topic. It contains a legal definition and different positions on that matter. It does at not point imply. It's not the job of AI (or news) to form an opinion, but to provide facts to allow consumers to form their own opinion. The issues isn't AI in this case. It's the inability of consumers to form opinions and their expec that others can provide a right or wrong opinion they can assimilation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Nice tits, bro!

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ask him,whether this alpha beta talk is a furry thing.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What the fuck? We have ~~Helis~~ a Heli, which actually fly?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

But that's not the definition of the absolut value, I.e. "distance" in complex numbers. That would be sqrt((1+i)(1-i)) = sqrt(2) Also the triangle inequality is also defined in complex numbers. This meme is advanced 4-4*2=0 Works only if you're doing it wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

"Made up" people or made up "people"? Quotes matter.

71
USB-C (discuss.tchncs.de)
 

Hello,

This does not directly relate to android or android devices but as this seems to be one of the more active communities, I thought I should give it a shot here.

I'm Wondering why the USB C socket and plug have the geometry they have. To me, it seems like the more complex hardware is located in the socket which is located on the more expensive device compared to the cable. Firebolt (is that the apple standard's name?) seem to handle it the opposite by having the flat plug with bare contacts.

Background is that I have frequently had issues with charging my phone due to dust or other dirt getting suck in the socket. Lacking adequate household items, I had to use a small screw driver to get the dirt out, which I think in general a bad idea.

Are there any technical reasons to have the flat contact in the center of the usb socket rather than the plug?

view more: next ›