Musk is ruining America.
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
836 points (100.0% liked)
politics
22232 readers
3583 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
MIRA?
que pasa
I wonder why he always brings his toddler kid to public gatherings...
I have a theory his kid is a human shield so he doesn’t get luigi’ed.
He's been wearing that kid like a hat ever since that CEO got shot. First time anyone had EVER seen the kid in public, too, and suddenly he hasn't been seen anywhere without him.
Imagine getting older and realizing your dad only spent time with you to avoid getting shot. Poor kid.
I just saw this and had to share. Seems you’re right….
load more comments
(2 replies)
All it does is puts a second person on that side of the trolly tracks.
It's a strange tactic coming from someone who supports Israel, where "human shield" is used as justification to destroy said shield along with the target.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
Social Security is a non-partisan red line.
If this chode killed it his chances of survival would plummet.
That the case may be, but he'd be a martyr for the ultra-capitalistic sorts that make these efforts their life's work.
A despicable end, but one that may appeal to Musk himself.
Nah. No one would mourn him. The next ultra rich person would learn from his mistakes, but continue on with his work.
I really hope he fucks with it.
I would buy all the popcorn to watch 2 million boomers walk up Pennsylvania Avenue to Gaddafi his ass for days.
Same, I truly believe Americans won't be on the same page about anything. Unless they fuck with it.
before his slash-and-burn nonsense and warped views of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid cause a spike in the sale of pitchforks.
Ha. I'd argue the time for pitchforks is already here.
load more comments
(1 replies)
He needs to be able to steal that money, you guyzzzzz!
Enriching fElon is about "efficiency", at least according to MOE - the Ministry of Efficiency, where up is down, black is white.
Musk = POS Nazi.
POS Nazi
Redundant statement is redundant.
If he guts SS, it will be his demise. That’s all the working class has to look forward to.
77 million mouth breathers will blame “woke”
They will themselves become "woke" when they realize they've been asleep for so long.
You could've said that 1,000x by now. Nothing will wake these people up.
At the first missed payment, they'll start burning down Social Security offices.
You don't want to piss off the old people. For many of them, its all they have. If you take that away, they'll have nothing left to lose, and lot of them are armed. That's a bad combination.
load more comments
(1 replies)
He’ll be replaced with another billionaire. Why are people focused on musk instead of at the root of the problem?
Perhaps if we made a strong enough example of him it'll make other billionaires think twice. The De Witt Brothers come to mind, tell them "It's either this or 92% wealth tax on assets, you pick."
There will always be a billionaire somewhere out there who’d be willing to give it a go. They don’t need to be a wealthy American who doesn’t want to pay taxes to do it. They can be a Russian oligarch. We need to get to the root source.
Then perhaps we should be so ruthless against that sort of practice, that it just doesn't look worth the gamble. Yes I agree, we need to get to the root source, but the billionaires are standing in the way of that arent they. Once upon a time they used to call social programs and such "Riot Tax" so we don't go after them, but we've clearly proven we don't even need a "riot tax" since we've proven to them we won't brutally deal with them in the most humiliating and painfully scary way possible. They're not worried about maintaining their social code because we're not giving them the appropriate consequences, so yes, as long as we don't sufficiently scare them another billionaire will take a crack at it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Republicans are doing a great job on both sides...social security in case your luck fucks out, and the market in case your thought you could get away:
Who said retirement? That's illegal! You and I will be working for elon until we both end up 6' under. (By that I mean fucking dead like a month Python parrot)
Unelected tech lord deciding grandma's retirement funds is exactly the cyberpunk hellscape novels warned us about.
🐱
Maybe stop using "unelected". Most of the cabinet is technically "unelected". Focus on the part where he did not get a senate confirmation.
Like... he must be so unpopular if he can't even get a republican controlled senate to approve him.
Musk is a symptom! Trump is the elected guy responsible for the actions of his "employee". Get him out and fix the nation!
Trump is also a symptom
Specifically, he is just one a dozen+ members what I dub Yarvin's Cabal, a group of elites trying to implement Project 2025. They all need to be hanging out with Mussolini, else the enshittification of America will continue unabated.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I do not understand why the fact that Musk is "unelected" matters so much to everyone. Is the Secretary of Defence elected? The Attorney General?
Is the Secretary of Defence elected? The Attorney General?
Those are real positions that are appointed by every President. "DOGE" is a complete bullshit position/department pulled out of thin air to avoid any kind of confirmation and/or security clearance.
It is incredibly dangerous for a President to be allowed to invent whole government departments and appoint whoever he wants to them without any checks and balances.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I think it's just to point out another layer of legitimacy he doesn't have to do what he's doing.
You don't hear this criticism levelled at other malfunctioning government officials though. Perhaps one would if they went as off-the-rails as Musk. Still, I wish people would use accurate critiques of their opponents, such as as @Doctor_Satan mentions, that he is wholly without cheques or balances.
And he's not a government official, even though he's impersonating one, and that the administration tells the public he's in charge of a government agency but tells the courts he's not.
While all of these things are true, I find it disingenuous to imply that his not having been elected is somehow less accurate than any other criticism levelled against him.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Musk labeled Social Security a "Ponzi scheme"
Well, he is correct about that. But in true republican fashion his solution is to get rid of it, instead of reforming it to be more sustainable without infinite population growth
No. I'm sick of ratcheting right, of normalizing the former Republican president's regime by half, of promising that maybe, eventually, long after my kids have died of old age, we'll get around to fixing what's broken. A return to normalcy will only legitimize this fucking bullshit. The climate is collapsing, there's microplastics in my brain and balls, the wealthy are actively trying to re-establish feudalism, and the level best the democrats can do is hold up signs and give me downvotes when I say they're not doing enough. There's evidence coming out that microplastics inhibit photosynthesis and cause crop failures, the shit's everywhere, and lol and fucking behold the UN can't even talk about it without getting drowned in a tsunami of lobbyists. Yes, hello, my name is Timothy Thompson, I'm with United Plastics, and I'm here to tell you about how single use plastics are good actually; can I offer you $5,000? I've recently come around to the idea that there's only around 10,000 very specific enormously wealthy, influential, or both people that we'd need to persuade to make the world a better, more livable place for everyone on the planet now and in the future, and right now, they aren't being effectively persuaded.
Friendship ended with centrist democrats. I am now friends with accelerationism.
This isn't what I'd expect to see from the McPaper.
view more: next ›