this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
180 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10083 readers
650 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I don't really care that much either way for speed cameras. They work in a very limited fashion, but they punish the poor the most, and the money goes to cops.

At the end of the day speed cameras are a solution to a problem that doesn't need to exist. We are failing to use technology available to us for basically no reason - we already know how to slow people and calm traffic without any kind of economic/punitive incentive.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Hey I got a ticket for going 57 in a school zone where the posted limit is 50, except the road only borders the far end of the school yard at the tip of its soccer field, with no way for students to exit, and the road itself is 4 lanes and should really have a speed limit of 60, and it was Sunday... Easter Sunday to be precise, so it was literally a school zone surrounded by days off.

Imagine if I hadn't been caught! I'm a Menace II Society, for sure.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Where do you live with a 50km/h school zone? That is psychotic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't know about the guy you are asking, but I have multiple school zones with a 50kph limit in my area as well.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The school zones in my area are 30kph, and a lot of people find that excessive and want it slower, so 50 is wild to me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I believe rural school zones are sometimes 50km/h. In context the non-school zone speed limit is usually 80km/h or more, often with visibility from one horizon to the other and a sprawling parking lot, it's not quite the same as a congested urban school with a driveway big enough to fit a single bus and dozens of cars parked along the curb.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Even when I lived in rural areas, the zones were 30kph where I am from. Parks, and playgrounds, are also generally included.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

but they punish the poor the most

They punish people who speed the most. If you make the needle on your dash point to the number that is posted on the road signs, you don't get a ticket.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I’ve gotten a ticket for going 1 over on a downhill. If you think that’s reasonable, you’re likely one of the idiots who created these things.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Citation needed. They don't set them at 1 over because it's hard to prove they are that accurate, your speedo also only has to be +/-3% in Ontario.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Demands citation. Makes claim. Leaves no citation. Stay classy, San Diego.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

but they punish the poor the most

Does being poor compel people to speed or something?

The problem is two-fold: one is that our roads are designed to encourage bad driving behaviour, and drivers feel entitled to drive in a way that's convenient (but not safe).

Have you ever tried to get traffic calming measures implemented in a community, especially around school zones? It's excruciatingly difficult, and a few complaints from NIMBYs will have those measures removed, wasting taxpayer money and not solving any problems.

It's infuriating that low powered micromobility devices like e-scooters are so severely restricted, but multi-ton weapons can be operated with almost no enforcement or consequences.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Does being poor compel people to speed or something?

No, but $100+ to a poor person could be the difference between literal life and death.

$100+ to someone well off or rich is nothing but pocket change.

The solution to this is sliding scale fines. The better off you are the more you get fined.

Why should a poor person have to spend 90% of their money on a fine when a "rich" person only has to spend 0.0009% for the exact same infraction.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Poor people generally don't own cars, and if you can afford to own a personal vehicle, you can afford to pay for driving like an asshole in one.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

What a strange disconnected reality you live in.

That or you're just a troll.

Either way im blocking your dumbass.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You know that you can drive a car you don't own right? And not every person who is ticketed is driving like an asshole. I got a 100 dollar ticket for driving 57 in what was normally a 50 km zone, but there was brand new signage up that I had literally 4 seconds to read (I went back and timed it) that gave: months of the year, days of the week, and hours of the day that the new 40 km/h speed limit was enforced. But because I can't read at the speed of light while driving down the road, bam, ticket.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You know that you can drive a car you don’t own right?

You know it costs money to gas, maintain, insure, and/or rent a car right?

And not every person who is ticketed is driving like an asshole. I got a 100 dollar ticket for driving 57 in what was normally a 50 km zone, but there was brand new signage up that I had literally 4 seconds to read (I went back and timed it) that gave: months of the year, days of the week, and hours of the day that the new 40 km/h speed limit was enforced. But because I can’t read at the speed of light while driving down the road, bam, ticket.

Fact of the matter is you were speeding before they adjusted the sign, it is your responsibility as a driver to obey all posted signage, and if you cannot abide by the rules of the road as well as be capable of reading and responding to signage I do not believe you should be allowed to drive because you are a risk to everyone around you.

You deserved that ticket, and I wish they had suspended your license until you were retested.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

LOL, a suspended licence for going 7 kms over the regular speed limit. Yeah, you're a rational person alright, and I should take any argument you have seriously. Ok.

And you know that you don't have to gas, maintain, insure or rent a car that you borrow from a friend of family member, right?

Going 7 over the regular limit does not make me a danger to society you absolute lunatic, and it is the responsibility of the government to make sure that signage is CLEAR and READABLE to people on the road.

Have a nice day.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You were going 17 over the posted limit, as per your story, and weren't aware enough to know about it.

You shouldn't have a license.

Take care.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

57-50=17? Did you attend school in America, or something? ChatGPT spit that answer out for you?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

57-50=17? Did you attend school in America, or something? ChatGPT spit that answer out for you?

The speed limit was 40, as per the story.

It is really funny to me that you insult my level of education while failing at solving a word problem though, so thank you for that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I got a 100 dollar ticket for driving 57 in what was normally a 50 km zone

I was going 7 over the limit as per my story, a great big 50km/h hour sign where 40 km/h was only enforced certain hours of the day, certain days of the week, certain months of the year

Reading comprehension ain't your strong suit, eh bud?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You were going 17 over the posted limit, as per your story, and weren’t aware enough to know about it.

Reading comprehension ain’t your strong suit, eh bud?

Thanks for another one. Keep it going DJ Khaled.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm not even OP. You're something, kiddo.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I know you aren't. Yet you are still dying ignorantly on this hill. Again, thanks for the laugh sweetums. I won't waste further time with you, have a good one snookiepoo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I was going 7 over the limit as per my story, a great big 50km/h hour sign where 40 km/h was only enforced certain hours of the day, certain days of the week, certain months of the year, all of which I was expected to read within literal seconds, and didn't slow down enough in time.

Any traffic enforcement officer would literally laugh in your face if you told them I shouldn't have a license. Grow a brain. This will be my last post. Jesus Christ you are such a fucking moron.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

It doesn't help if this was a long time ago, but you could contest the ticket with the information you gathered.

I know someone who got a ticket but the sign was obscured by a tree branch. After contesting the ticket, the ticket was dropped and the signage was fixed

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

No, but $100+ to a poor person could be the difference between literal life and death.

Sure, but nobody is compelling someone to break traffic laws. Someone who can't afford a fine will probably drive way more cautiously.

But very few poor people can even afford a car these days, so this doesn't seem like a real concern.

The solution to this is sliding scale fines. The better off you are the more you get fined.

I do agree with that. And more than that, the consequences should include lost time. Imagine some rich asshole who has to do 40 hours of community service. They'd look like a total ass in front of their boss or employees.