this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
203 points (100.0% liked)

News

28416 readers
4052 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 9 months ago

.. or as republicans say, Tuesday.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Is it too soon to talk about gun law reforms?

[–] [email protected] 54 points 9 months ago

We had a shooting in the USA in the last 24 hours, how insensitive of you to raise the topic

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Yes, let's discuss how unnecessary they are after all the shooting stops

[–] outdated2139 5 points 9 months ago (5 children)

What would you like to see? Washington has a lot of gun control.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So does nearly every country with extremely low gun violence rates. Now, tell us that doesn't count for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah but here in France there was a mass shooting in Paris during the terrorist attack of 2015 (like, almost yesterday but 9 years ago), and Trump had a great speech about it during a (NRA?) conference when he said that it wouldn't have happened if we had guns! Very smart, MIT and stuff, but no shark, no, sharks bad!

[–] outdated2139 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So what gun control do you think we should enact? It is a direct question. No need to be passive aggressive.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Obviously anything I say will be invalidated for some reason or other. Can we skip to the part where you say that other countries have policies that would never work here?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You need gun control everywhere in the country. Unfortunately it’s too easy for people to just buy them in the next town and drive them in. That is not a reason to keep letting it happen, of course, but it is why “[city/state] does have laws and there are still problems” arguments are kinda worthless.

And then you gotta wait a long-ass time because even cutting off supply there are already more guns than people in the U.S.. Best time to plant a tree and all that means ya’ll need to hurry.

[–] outdated2139 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So you would want a near ban on all guns? Just curious what you mean by gun control everywhere.

One thing that I'm sure will come out of this story is the gun is stolen. Washington has safe storage laws, but if you report your gun stolen, you are not liable for any crimes committed with it. It happened when a man shot a mother and child in Seattle and the original owner was okay because he reported it stolen. The government should be prosecuting these negligent gun owners.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I mean, that’d be cool with me. And for context I used to have a restricted license(Canadian) that allowed me to own pistols and the like. I enjoy shooting plenty but not at this cost.

I mean “everywhere” because of exactly what I’ve already said. If you ban handguns in Chicago but all someone has to do to get around that is drive out of the city and purchase it in a small town a couple hours away then what’s the point? There are plenty of ways around it at various levels of control when there’s such easy access closeby. We can all agree that strip-searching every car entering Chicago would be insane so the other option is to just not have the guns in the first place.

The point about it probably being stolen doesn’t really change anything. With this many firearms and relying on individuals to be 100% perfect there’s bound to be slip-ups and shady people spreading the weapons all over. You’re right that people should be prosecuted for not securing their weapons but what if they do and a thief just happens to be good enough or lucky enough to take the stuff anyway?

It’s a hobby but so many people have made it their damned personality that they’re willing to saturate their country with them and allow children to die at alarming rates so they can do something 100% optional. If people want to hunt they can use a fuckin’ bow.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Is that why there are kids having a gunfight in a mall?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Not enough to curb the fetish, apparently.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Clearly it’s working as intended

[–] [email protected] 41 points 9 months ago

“‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says the Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens.”

— The Onion

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Alderwood Mall? That's the nicer one! If it were the Everett Mall, I'd be unsurprised, but Alderwood? That's wild.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

You mix teenagers and guns and it doesn't really matter how nice the mall is.

As the parent of a teenager, I know exactly how moody they can get and how quickly their moods can change from happy to "I will fucking kill a motherfucker." I wouldn't give a teenager a gun in a million years.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But only a good teenager with a gun can stop a bad teenager with a gun.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

The KFC needs a machinegun nest, and Dunkin should keep some landmines in those donut trays.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The minimum age of enlistment should give you nightmares.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

The idea of mandatory enlistment gives me nightmares. But also the fact that you can be old enough to kill but not old enough to be trusted with alcohol or tobacco. That is just ludicrous on the face of it. This nation is a madhouse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But would you give 1 million teenagers to one gun for a year?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

I thought it was going to be Tacoma for sure.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

The ONLY ONLY ONLY way for this to have been Prevented was if SHE Killed the Gunman FIRST! And the ONLY ONLY ONLY way for HIM to prevent his own death was if he killed HER FIRST! So as a Pro Life Save The Children Republican I see NO ISSUES WHATSOEVER with this!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Why do they have a statement from the investment firms's pr department? What does that add to the story? Wgaf what their thoughts are on the matter? It's really strange.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've been to this place, ages ago. It was the kind of place you would bring a baby to without a second thought. Crazy that it's come to this.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What's crazy is someone saying "It's somewhere you'd bring a baby to without a second thought" about a fucking shopping mall

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I'm not going to argue with you - living as we are car-free now in a walkable city it's unthinkable for me. But when I was in America, with a car and a baby, it made perfect sense. There were fewer viable third spaces (aside from parks, which is harder for an infant on a rainy day), and just about every viable third space (where we were) was built around car infrastructure.

All that to say you're not quite wrong, but there's nuance and the solutions are necessarily political.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I used to go to this mall frequently. It is absolutely not the kind of mall where this regularly happens. Lynnwood is just suburbia. This ain’t Everett mall.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Even Everett mall is nice, I'm really surprised to be reading about this.

What a shameful waste of a beautiful life for that young girl.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

gUnS dOn'T kIlL pEoPlE, pEoPlE kIlL pEoPlE....

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Maybe we need the right to bear people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Only if they are convicted first, not everyone can own people these days

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Shhhh, you’re supposed to say “incarcerated individuals leased to public and private companies”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Student athletes!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I am already more deadly than a bear according to this site.

load more comments
view more: next ›