this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
147 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68187 readers
5294 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 63 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Not American, but is this the homophobic food chain?

[–] tyler@programming.dev 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

No, the ceo is homophobic, but the chain itself has no restrictions on hiring gay people, serving gay people, etc. some people don’t seem to get the difference.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So they do the minimum required by law?

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sadly I think they're legally allowed to not serve gay people in certain states. The minimum is just hiring gay people :(

[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Im pretty sure they serve gay people in those states too.

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah they do, I'm just pointing out that the law doesn't say a business has to. Sorry, being pedantic

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

As do every company? Is this news?

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The owners directly support anti-lgbtq organizations.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And plenty of owners of other companies support even worse orgs, I don’t get your point. What the owners do in their free time honestly doesn’t mean jack shit. NASA uses SpaceX whose owner is currently one of the most bigoted people on the planet. Do you still support NASA?

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I directly control my spending, not NASA's.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Then you shouldn’t support pretty much any fast food chain. All their CEOs or downstream CEOs act pretty much the same. Treating Chick-fil-A like it’s somehow different here is just hypocritical.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 62 points 7 months ago

It better not function on Sundays.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's going to be an evangelical propaganda machine.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

That's the thing. It's going to be a purely evangelical version of the Hallmark Channel.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Remember when they kept getting attacked for being "woke".

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 38 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Some reason? I'm going to go for money, the reason is money. Humans have an incredible tolerance for advertisement right now and the majority of people (sorry, lemmites, I know you feel different, but if you think your views are widespread think again) are becoming accustomed to subscribing to a variety of streaming services. If you have capital and know anything about advertising, this is a cash grab for you. A lot of content can be produced quite cheaply now.

[–] astanix@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I am vehemently against ads in all places for all things. It's astounding to me when my family or friends are shocked that I'm so against them. People just accept ads everywhere and it's terrible.

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

This is so true. My own daughters, who I raised from birth, and who I tried to inculcate with good sense...yes, even they....they tolerate ads. I know, I know. It is hard to believe. But I have personally witnessed them watching Youtube ads with apparent interest. That was a hard day.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

I really thought the early Netflix era would have emboldened this attitude in everyone, but yes it's incredible how tolerant so many people are about more and more ads in everything as long as it means something is cheap or free. I don't have a ton of money to throw around either, but the cost of eliminating ads and just paying for what I am getting is almost always worth it.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have often mused on how to remotely demolish billboards along highways. Almost all ads are garbage.

The only ones I'm even remotely OK with are the old-timey painted ones on the sides of brick buildings.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have often mused on how to remotely demolish billboards along highways.

Rocket launcher? If you're in the US you might even be able to obtain one legally. If you can't, maybe a truck-mounted trebuchet would work.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I've seen flamethrower drones

Maybe buy the space and have them put up a photo of what's behind it?

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 12 points 7 months ago

Smells like a completely fictional story fed to the media for free coverage. Similar to that KFC console a few years ago which never actually existed but allowed KFC to get its name plastered across all types of news feeds for months.

[–] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 18 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Streaming sponsored by bigoted religious animal abusers. Yeah no it’s gonna be a hard pass for me.

[–] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 7 points 7 months ago
[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

And trans people too.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 7 months ago

I mean, yeah, they pay others to kill them, then fry them.

[–] OmgItBurns@discuss.online 13 points 7 months ago

If they don't call it Chick-fa-licks I'll be disappointed. I mean as a whole I find the company upsetting already, but I will add disappointment to that.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago

So, not the fast food chain, but their parent company diversifying.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If the entire streaming service is literally just a video of a chicken sandwich I might have to betray the gays on meme principle.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

And Chicken Run 1. They can't afford #2.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So, what, they're going to make shows about how to fuck up waffle fries? Or how about the part where all their chicken's bland as shit. "Spicy" my ass. Oh, how about the part where they're owned by a bunch of Christian nut jobs? How are they going to make that into a channel? Play reruns of Rich Church Wants Your Donations?

[–] Azal@pawb.social 2 points 7 months ago

Or how about the part where all their chicken’s bland as shit. “Spicy” my ass.

Popeyes is the superior chicken fast food. I'll fight anyone on this hill.

I've had practice eating at Popeyes.