this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
909 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

21852 readers
967 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It helps if you break it apart into its component parts. Which is like anything else, really, but we've all accepted that regexes are supposed to run together in an unreadable mess. No reason it has to be that way.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If they are Perl regexes, like all regexes are supposed to be, you can have non-semantic whitespace and comments.

But if you are using some system that enforces something different, you are out of luck.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Not necessarily. For just debugging purposes, you can still break them up to help understand them. Even ignoring that, there are options in languages that don't implement /x.

https://wumpus-cave.net/post/2022/06/2022-06-06-how-to-write-regexes-that-are-almost-readable/index.html

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At my company we store our regex in the database with linebreaks in it, but when it's actually called to be used those line breaks are stripped out. That way regex that looks for X can all be all on one line and actually readable.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

wait... why do you have so many regexes you need to put them in a database???

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

The comments flag needs more support.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have found chatgpt to be very good at writing regex. I also don't know how to write regex.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

In my experience, it is good at simple to medium complexity regex. For the harder ones it starts being quite useless though, at best providing a decent starting point to begin debugging from.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

well, you won't get better using chatgpt for it

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just pop them into regex101 or a similar tool, add sample data, see the mistake, fix the mistake, continue to do other stuff.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Just pop them into regex101 or a similar tool, add sample data, ~~see the mistake, fix the mistake, continue to do other stuff.~~ it works there, pull hair

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I usually do

# What we are doing (high level)
# Why we need regex
# Regex step by step
# Examples of matches
regex

And I still rewrite it the next time

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
// abandon all hope ye who commit here
(?:[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+(?:\.[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+)*|"(?:[\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x21\x23-\x5b\x5d-\x7f]|\\[\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x7f])*")@(?:(?:[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?\.)+[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?|\[(?:(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.){3}(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?|[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9]:(?:[\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x21-\x5a\x53-\x7f]|\\[\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x7f])+)\])

Edith: damit, Not the first to post this abomination

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

This is the one I use! Might have to look at regexer though

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Never debug regex, just generate a new one. It's not worth the hassle to figure out not only what it does, but what it was meant to do.

Better yet, just write it out in code, and never use regex. Tis a stupid thing that never should have been made.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)

Hard disagree. The function regex serves in programs like Notepad++ can't be easily replaced by "writing it out in code". With a very small number of characters you can get complex search patterns and capturing groups. It's hard to read but incredibly useful.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Can't upvote twice, have a low effort comment instead

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Regex is a write only language.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Me checking my own docs: "this is some voodoo shit, idk how it works"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That's what my comments say

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Downvoted so that everyone can know I'm cool since I understand regex better than the idiot who made that meme.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I know I'm weird, but I love regex.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This is basically code refactoring on a simplified level. You're basically renaming a whole bunch of functions/tokens at once.

Let's say you're renaming the variable 'count' under the method 'buttplug'. First off, what do you rename it to?

You start by replacing every instance of buttplug.count with a unique token, let's say tnuoc.gulpttub.

Then you replace that buttplug with a unique buttplug.

Simple.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Then you replace that buttplug with a unique buttplug.

Rare buttplugs with good affixes are better than unique buttplugs.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If I have a complex regular expression to code into my app, I write it in pomsky, then copy paste the compiled regex to my source file, but also keep the pomsky source nearby. Much more maintainable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

There are a few online regex testing tools that will analyse your efforts and give you the opportunity to provide sample data.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Aziz! LIGHT!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

LOL yeah that's about right.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Ohhhhh it was this extra '

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

There are no bugs, it's just not doing what you expect it to be doing...

... which, now that I think of it, can be said about all software in general.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›