The industry can go fuck itself. Actors, Football players, CEOs et al, don't need to earn 25M€ per year. Spend less in wages for those cunts and you'll see profitability rise without geoblocking.
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
59541 readers
178 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
Torrenting/P2P:
Gaming:
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why do you hate success, boy?!
These people work very hard selling you shit you don't need!
Don't fund your oppressors folks...
This is another example of how class war looks like in nuts and bolts. But there thousands other ways the corpo parasite will use the state against the taxpayer who funds it.
Taxation isn't voluntary
Paying for any media slop is ;)
How are we going to pay a football player 50 million if you don't allow us to cheat everyone and squeeze every cent out of them?
Fuck them
Does VPN help, in this case, to avoid geo-fencing?
Usually yes. In some cases, companies will block access to known VPN IPs outright.
But most of the time, the cost of policing that is way higher than the revenue they'd get from the handful of VPN users that decide to go through proper channels rather than decide not to engage, or worse, spread word of their anti-consumer practices and potentially lose legitimate business.
We argue that we won't be able to buy a second gold plated swimming pool if these rules are gone!
Let it burn
It's kind of crazy that video content is exempt from the EU single market. What was the reasoning for that? The link to the previous article doesn't even mention it - was written seemingly before it came into action or was defined.
What it does mention is why it's so critical.
Due to complicated licensing agreements Netflix is only available in a few dozen countries, all of which have a different content library.
And also
This means that consumers will have the right to access content they purchased at home in other European countries.
If you have a single market, and free travel (Schengen), being able to access and buy content in them is substantial, or would otherwise subvert them.
If it's only regional, I can at least see some reasoning; the purchasing power varies quite a bit between countries. But still, there's the question of how that relates to and opposes the idea and conditions of a single market. And it certainly doesn't warrant geo-blocking like what you have access to or can buy. Regional pricing could be implemented by a law-defined or -restricted simple factor based on purchasing power.
Steam does different regional prices even within Europe too, right?