Source (Tumblr), alternate frontend
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
1015 points (100.0% liked)
Microblog Memes
7128 readers
1421 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Unfortunately I could still read this, needs more jpeg.
Diogenes strips naked and does a cannonball into the pool
"Behold! A fish!"
load more comments
(2 replies)
One man opinion about fish is not a universal truth.
I try to tell folks all the time that biology is not as simplistic as they think. It's basically an endeavor of humans trying to make simplistic categories out of a naturally complicated clusterfuck. Some things defy labels, not everything fits into a nice, easy little box. Life is complicated. Get over it.
Attention! Turn back. Going into these comments can bring you nothing of happiness. You can just look up the "tumblr reading comprehension" meme instead of needing to see the gory details of it in action.
This is not a place of honor. Nothing of value is here.
But comments like that are exactly why I'm here!
Haha fair enough, in that case you will find exactly what you're looking for.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yes this! I hate when people say biology supports their trans/homo/ect. phobia when in reality it absolutely does not
It's 1st grade biology!
Yes, it is. Advertising the fact that you only know biology up to a 1st grade level is not the flex you think it is.
Transphobic people must really hate frogs.
i don't think transphobes are educated enough to know frog biology. and if they are they suffer from a "humans are not animals" kind of mentality and put humanity on a pedestal of not being like the other ~~girls~~ living beings on this planet
And many kinds of fish! Like clown fish : ]
load more comments
(5 replies)
It's likely easier for people to learn to love trans people than understand there are no fish... If that tells you anything.
load more comments
(21 replies)
Transphobes 🤯 after reading this
Not even close to a transphobe and my mind is still blown at the fact of the nonexistence of fish.
Just gonna swing by and drop this little grenade:
If you believe "race doesn't exist", then this post also applies to you. If you can refer to different genders while also understanding that at the individual level definitions are fluid and blurry, then you can refer to different races while also understanding that at the individual level definitions are fluid and blurry.
Got it, fish are racist confirmed.
Of course some fish are racist, especially humans.
Fish absolutely exist cladistically, OP just didn't want to admit they're a land dwelling fish. You believe the implications of cladistics or you don't, cowards.
I'd also argue it's relatively easy to separate fish-fish from land fish from land fish that became sea fish again to bully the fish fish.
load more comments
(6 replies)
The world is a wonderful place, and far too wide to need to conform to your pet theory.
I have a theory that you're all my pets. So you will conform, or you won't get a treat.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I was going to say ‘how about bony fish?’, but then I checked and I am technically a bony fish (Osteichthyes).
Bees are fish.
(in California)
We're all just collectively ignoring the biologist's username?
I mean they are definitely correct, but that name detracts from their credibility somewhat.
That's a problem for the future society
load more comments
(6 replies)
Regarding "fish" Old classification relied on "phenotype" characteristics. And yes lamprey, a shark or a cod has little in common genetically. But they still share some common traits that distinguishes them considerably from whales, sea lions and seals. I still think the term "fish" is useful, and modern classifications rely more on genetics so I would say that the argument is semi void.
They didn't say that fish wasn't a useful concept, they said that the more you delve into the facts, the less certain you can be that it has a definite meaning that can be pinned down scientifically.
People think the science agrees with them that the world can be divided into fish and not fish, but that's absolutely not what the science is saying, and their understanding is superficial.
Similarly, the terms male and female are generally quite useful, but the people who think that there's some kind of scientific and absolute binary distinction between them are just incorrect, and their understanding is superficial.
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›