this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
62 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9653 readers
1294 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is the only thing that's going to fix the housing crisis actually reducing the cost of homes? And nobody actually wants that to happen.. so...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Nobody who owns a home wants that to happen*

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Even moreso, those who own other people's homes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Because the entire economic system inherently benefits entrenched Capital.

This game of Monopoly was decided before we were born.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My home price has doubled since Covid, but so have all the others around me. The gains are fake. The only benefit is to the real estate agent, and my ego.

Drive the prices into the ground.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'll save you a click. Because they're poorly and cheaply made, limited in design, and generally small. Also the savings aren't what they should be for the reduction in quality

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Where did you see the thing about quality? All I found was:

They also had to overcome the “zeitgeist around prefabrication in Canada” which assumes factory builds are poor quality, Chicoine said.

That’s no longer based in reality; some studies have argued prefab projects can catch potential defects during the design phase, yielding higher-quality builds.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You assumed by, "save you a click," they'd read and summarized the article? No, they are such a big brain, they know everything without even having to read the article!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

You assumed by, "save you a click," they'd read and summarized the article?

Not at all. But it never hurts to be polite.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah prefabrication is the way to go to accelerate tonthebratebof houses we need right now

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

That's not really the focus of the article at all.

I think prefab has the potential to ease the housing crisis here in Australia.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I had a friend do this. It's a great house and the process went very smoothly.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a sensible way to do it. Modern prefab doesn't necessarily mean the house is entirely built offsite and then dropped in place. It just means that more of the assembly is done in a controlled, precision, effficient environment (a factory) and then assembled on site with less time and expense. It means more houses, faster and cheaper. Which is what we need.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sears company has prefab homes still standing.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sears_Modern_Homes

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This can work in some places (mostly looking at the prairies), but will do close to zero in others (like eastern Canada+BC). The simple problem is that the land the house is built on is often worth something like 80% the cost of buying property. The cost of a new house can be zero, but that will do little to help people afford new homes. Only slightly better than the tax cuts PP is proposing, which will have just as weak of an effect helping those who don't already own six houses.

The solution is to use the land we already use for homes more efficiently, and the only way to do that is to build condos and apartments. Make them mixed use and you can add the rental fees of a grocery store and several other services to the mix to subsidize the cost even further. A single grocery store that'll take up half the ground floor paid something like a million in rent a year, and that was before COVID. Add a convenience store, a couple fast food restaurants, a bar, and a dentist or salon, and you've got a mini-mall that'll rake in several million in rent that has a captured clientele in those that live above and near them. And that number will be in the hundreds for a 30 story apartment in the space of half a city block, since there'd be more than ten units per floor, even if it only has two-four bedroom units.

Such buildings can't be built in a factory, even partially. Not if we want them to last more than ten years, since that's the problem with the quick condos China tried to build.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You might not be able to pre construct the whole building, but there's a lot of new technology out there that pre builds very large parts.

I've seen 15m pre fabricated concrete walls placed with cranes before.

There's a lot we could probably do like that which would speed up build times.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

If I remember right, that was basically what they did to make commie blocks.

If the building isn't too tall, maybe 5 stories or less, that is proven to work, though I don't know about the quality, at least it's durable. But I strongly doubt that it would work for skyscrapers. I don't think there's any way to get beyond single large support struts to go throughout the entire building, and concrete walls feel too heavy to be used. Maybe prefab concrete floors could work, but I don't work construction.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

The Vancouver special was made illegal in the late 80s for seemingly no reason. Every municipal has tons of bureaucracy on what can be built, likely in order to stifle new development and to raise home values.

This will succeed only in so much as the Liberals through Brookfield will take a chunk of profits. Which is fine, if it took a bit of corruption to wipe out municipal bureaucracy then its still a win for the poor.

I was also in favor of Doug ford getting kickbacks for opening up greenbelt, I don't see how we do 4% annual population growth without actions like that.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

The greenbelt doesn't even need development. The province's own report said we just need to make better use of our land. In too much of Ontario for too long, zoning has restricted most homes to be inefficient single family housing and suburban sprawl far from peoples' jobs. We need missing middle housing, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and greater density.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Weird take.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I was also in favor of Doug ford getting kickbacks for opening up greenbelt, I don’t see how we do 4% annual population growth without actions like that.

Going to assume this was awkwardly worded because why would you ever think that politicians getting kickbacks is in your best interests?? That's pants-on-head.

What in the world does the greenbelt have to do with housing? Do you think lack of space to build is anywhere on the roster of issues standing in our way??

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think land values are extremely high due to a lack of available land relative to demand. Exacerbated by sprawled zoning that nimbys have fought tooth and nail against.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Honest request: Explain to me how Brookfield is involved

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The answer to this has always been no, everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Not quite true. Many homes in Canada literally were ordered from the Eaton catalogue. Truck arrives with all the components, you assemble it yourself. We used to do these things.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, but it won’t fill the housing gap.

Those houses still have to be assembled somewhere.

The more likely solution is a big fibre optic rollout and getting all information workers out of the cities.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

We should give tax credit for wfh too perhaps.

Except our government doesn't actually want housing prices to fall, or for there to be less people in the city.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

More people should be living in the city so the wilderness can remain the wilderness. Build up, not out.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They would be assembled on site.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah; in most of the places where there are housing issues, the problem isn’t skilled labour to build houses or a lack of building materials (although those can become issues) — it’s the cost and availability and accessibility of land. There’s no “on site” to assemble them on.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

the problem isn’t skilled labour to build houses

Can you provide any references for this? My naive web searches find that most sources say there is a significant skill labour shortage, so if you can provide sources which I can learn from that would be helpful.

it’s the cost and availability and accessibility of land

Housing shortage is a multi-dimensional problems with what you mention here included. One plank in the BCH platform that attempts to address this is the release federal lands for new housing. I suppose it will remain to be seen how that works out, if Carney is elected.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. We actually already do prefab with roof trusses. They are precision manufactured in a factory, shipped to the site and then assembled. This is extending the same principle to other home components like wall assemblies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Because prefab homes are an euphemism for mobile home or trailer home. That's why. No one wants to live in a low quality house.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You have no idea what a prefab is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes I do i, I have had neghibors who lived in them. all notedethat even the good ones make quality compromises over the better site built. Which isn't a surprize as site built gets nost things pre cut to size and to there isn't much room. A site built house just brings the factory to the site.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you aware that many high-end luxury log homes are prefab?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

high end and luxury need not imply quality. For that matter I'm aware of some of those logs houses and calling them prefab implies a lot more factory than they have - they are built (at least for the one I know of) just like any other stick house then left to dry for a year.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just because we've built homes on site from raw materials for decades doesn't mean there are not better ways to do it. Prefabrication is not that uncommon in other parts of the world. The problem in Canada is that our industry is built around on site construction so it has a lot of inertia and there is tremendous financial risk to making changes. What Carney's plan does is create stable demand, provide funds, and create incentives, for the industry to change faster.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Homes are not built onsight with raw materials. They are built with heavially processed things like plywood and 2x4s. Both of the above are mostly precut to the exact length needed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is such a weird, fact-less comment. Plywood and 2x4s do not come "precut to the exact length needed". They come in standard sizes: 4x8 foot sheets and 8 foot lengths (I'm generalizing here, there are of course other sizes). Every construction site in Canada has skilled carpenters on site that cut those standard sized goods (what I called "raw materials") to correct dimensions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

most of the 2x4s in a us site are precut to 92 5/8. This with the top and bottom 2x4s add up to your standard 8 foot wall. A few are cut for windows/doors and those top and bottom plates are cut to size, butithe vast majority come precut to length. Your plywood is put in place directly, only the pieces around the edge are cut. Yes you hear a saw all day - but the majority of parts are precut.

you can also get 2x4s in 104 5/8 length. And drywall in 4.5x8 foot sizes for your standard 9 foot tall ceilings.

the above is us. I'm not sure how metric canada house construction is but there are similar sizes for metric regions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not saying that lumber doesn't come in sizes optimized to save time and material, that's only sensible. But as you've said there is still cutting on site and frankly there's a fair bit of it, despite what you claim. With prefab most of the cutting is done in a factory and there are very few if any cuts on site. Complete modular components are delivered and fastened together, and on site assembly is measured in weeks not months. The idea that this will not ultimately be a better way to build homes just isn't well founded. It's a better way but different and it's going to take time and investment for the industry to change. We have an opportunity here to help our country put people in homes and invest and be a leader in that change, and that's what I'm voting for.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›