this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
355 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

6736 readers
281 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  4. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Illustrations

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Must have been invented by a foot fetishist

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago

who seeks glory

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They'll never know I'm licking their feet now!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

"Oh, sorry, ma'am. I am preparing your foot with a warm sponge. I should have warned you ahead of time."

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

We all can see his smile in the picture

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

The guy fitting the shoe has a big smile, and it's not his customer service face.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The lady's eyes were under their skirts in Victorian times?

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Just a single “whispering eye.”

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why oh why is no one concerned about the use of “and” here?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

If they used "or" wouldn't that imply that it only does one at a time?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If the sales person doesn't have a foot fetish before they start using that device, they absolutely will by the end of it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Inventor of the 'glory sole'

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cos later on he's going to tie her to a railway track.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Or he just likes the smell. He's got the nose for it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

So it's his fault for creating foot fetishists and the reason I had to fire someone when they kept asking other employees for feet pics.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Glory hole for a foot fetishist.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

The ankle was all he needed.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

So the woman can't see if the salesman is diddling himself while leering hungrily at her exposed ankle?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is 100% way more reasonable that letting women put their own shoes.

/s just in case

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How could she put on her own shoes while wearing a corset? Besides, that’s the servants’ job.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Good point. Also, found the time traveler.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Definitely wasn't inventing gloryholes and had to come up with an alternative explanation when the boss walked in. We've all been there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Billingsley! What the devil are you doing with that contraption!?"

  • oh this oh uehm it's for ahhh shoes! Feeet! Yess keeps the devil's thoughts at bay when this thing blocks the vision of anyone using it!! I was just facing toward it to check out the size and the wobbling was me testing the build quality ahh yes!

"But where are your pants? And why does that need to involve your bloody cock and balls!??"

  • ........
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You remain the best, The Picard Maneuver

Everyone continues to like you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Didn't the woman care about how the shoe looked on her? The device seems to also block the view for her.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Wonder what her leg is being executed for? What crime did it commit?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Nothing. It's toetally innocent.

(...I'll see myself out.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Excessive skin exposure

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

It's not being executed, just humiliated in front of all the other feet.

The other feet can like throw socks at it or something.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Al Bundy would have loved one of these

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like this isn't real

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That whole period of history has to be made up

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

No, I think they meant "this is most likely an AI hallucination, NOT something that actually existed."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Walking around to test the shoes was almost impossible, but usually gathered a little crowd to cheer the lassie on.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This has generated significant interest and discussion, so I'm going to leave this up, but in the future, please submit only photographs and film on this comm.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought it was a tail, but then.... Is it a hat?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think that is an actual hood! It would basically be an old style cloth long cap, done extra long and then wrapped around the neck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Kinda reminds me of the matrix head tails from 3d pocahontas smurfs

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Is this a new requirement from the US government for shoe stores or is this about history? I'm really unsure