this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
683 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23457 readers
3070 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration’s tariff scheme appears less and less likely to bring manufacturing jobs back to U.S. shores.

Businesses across the country are crunching the numbers and realizing that, despite Donald Trump’s insistence, they can’t balance out his tariff hikes across the supply chain.

“Some manufacturers who had plans to open factories in the country say the new duties are only adding to the significant obstacles they already faced,” Bloomberg reported Friday.

That’s because the supply chain to produce those goods in the United States simply isn’t there, requiring companies to import raw materials and factory equipment—which Trump’s tariffs have made unaffordable—from abroad.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Right, this is why an intelligent leader might use tariffs to bring back manufacturing, in a very targeted way and matched with incentives to help build what is missing.

This is someone who heard that you could use a hammer in conjunction with nails to build a house so starts swinging mjolnir in every direction

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Tariffs aren't designed to bring manufacturing back. It's designed to crush the US economy for Daddy Putin. It's designed to starve out the plebs. It's designed to bankrupt companies to be bought by the billionaire class for pennies on the dollar.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Leave Russia out of it. It's your own rigged election system and lack of real competition that led to this

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I'm not American nor living in the USA.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

You left out the most important reason: getting people to come kiss Trump's ass to ask for exemptions. Nothing is more important than getting Trump the sycophancy he has to settle for in lieu of respect.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 days ago (8 children)

that's what happens when you have zero fucking plan at all

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

You mean “cOnCePts Of a PlAn” don’t count?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

You mean any knowledge at all about anything or thinking ahead , which this administration hasn't done at all, seeing as they and DOGE have just cut jobs everywhere and then these agencies have to hire people back because they're understaffed and shit is falling apart.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 244 points 3 days ago (13 children)

You don't say. That kind of seemed obvious from the very fucking start. Trump is absurdly incompetent or he is actively working to destroy the country. I honestly can't tell which it is.

[–] [email protected] 88 points 3 days ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trump may be incompetent but the architects of project 2025 are, unfortunately, not. Trump is merely their most useful idiot.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh, they’re incompetent, too. They are just very effective at installing their incompetence into the government.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The Heritage Foundation is not new; their last big project was Ronald Reagan, and they were very successful in destroying the economy in the long run. That also started us down this path that got us to Trump to begin with.

Trump would never have happened if there wasn't mass amounts of economic hardship.

I think "evil" is a better word to describe them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump may have never happened if the fucking dnc supported bernie in 2016..

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Or if Florida didn't rig the 2000 election for Bush, or if the Supreme Court never ruled that money = speech and corporations = people, or if Nixon didn't snuff out the hippie movement with the War on Drugs, or if the FBI never killed MLK Jr. for him being a socialist, or if Ronald Reagan and Joe McCarthy were unsuccessful in their Red Scare movement in the 1950s, or if FDR didn't compromise with capitalists and went full socialist instead.

There are lots of things to point to.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I really think it’s just not a plan, but a bunch of individual wishlists. It’s not that evil is incompetent but it’s a bunch of people each pursuing their own agenda, each using the orange fool to get what they want. The part where we may get lucky is each is too egotistical to work together, and Trump is to weak a leader to make them all head in the same directions.

It’s not a bunch of incompetent fools, is a herd of evil cats

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

Sorry, I had to.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

The math is such that I expect to see companies that make things in the us leave. Makes more sense to build in the UK and add the 10% tarriff for your thing made of chinese parts than absorb the XX% chinese tarriffs and have to raise the price even more in the us. If the product is sold abroad at all its a slam dunk to move out.

[–] [email protected] 99 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But you mean your company isn’t willing to make a years long investment in on-shore manufacturing capacity when the scales that make it advantageous to the company can change in any direction, at any point, for any made-up reason, by any amount? Don’t they love investing in America?

/s+++

[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's not even that entirely

You can't build X here unless every component is also produced... here. The component factories can't be built here here until there's factories building the subcomponents for them, AND a buyer for them here.

A button up shirt needs cotton -> chemical treatment -> dyes -> fabric, base chemicals > plastic pellets -> buttons, AND the machines to do all of those processes. It's like 7 or 8 different factories just to produce a shirt with buttons on it. Imagine how many factories it is for anything more complex.

Then in comes your point of needing commitment when it's not even certain for more than a week, nobody is going to build out entire supply chains in that scenario.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

Gamers Nexus just talked to some PC manufacturers about this.

"We assemble PCs, made in America from these parts"

(motherboard, CPU, graphics card, PSU, ...)

So what if, for example, the motherboard manufacturer moved to the US?

Well that's an assembly of a hundred or so other Chinese components. And the equipment needed to manufacture it would need to be imported.

Ok, but what if all those hundreds of factories were built in the US?

Well, they all use imported aluminium and steel and plastic, etc., and require their own imported machines to produce...

"Is any part of your PC entirely made in the US?"

"The shipping labels? And maybe some packaging"

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago

That is a very good point that I hadn’t considered, thanks for your response.

To your point, that just makes it even more of a ridiculous proposition.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Another example would be Trump saying that US farmers now have unprecedented access to the UK market for sales but the US uses growth hormone which is banned in the UK and Europe. It's very unlikely they're going to designate a non growth hormone section of their farm just to ship beef overseas.

Which would only be financially sound if for some reason there is significant demand for American beef in the UK which.. Why would there be?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's the point. Destroy America but keep idiots voting for it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well they want to almost destroy America, that way the rich can buy up everything for cheap and become even more pwoerful. They're literally trying to recreate the situation that caused the rise of oligarchs in Russia.

And the idiots vote for it because they've been brainwashed by propaganda to think they'll be part of the elite once it's over.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So first Trump prevents any ex-allies to the US from trading with them

Then Trump prevents factories from being opened in the US to produce goods locally

What kind of 6D backgammon is this?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

The kind where shelves go empty soon. I remember walking round the grocery store during covid and everything being empty, felt like a dream. Now it's a nightmare.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (7 children)

This is what I’ve been saying, building factories is already an expensive and time consuming process, then you slap high prices on everything you need to make a factory work it’s going to be out of reach for basically anyone and the few who can afford it likely wouldn’t anyway because like this describes it’s not fiscally responsible but also the US is in decline why would you be putting an enormous investment into a wildly unstable system? If you want manufacturing in the US building factories needs to be reasonable price wise and you need consumers with the funds to do the consuming, neither of which can be delivered now

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Never listen to the reason they claim to be doing something, look only to what they are doing. And that, quite clearly, day after day indicates that they are doing everything they can to destroy the USA, as quickly as possible. Once one has determined what they are doing, then ask who does this benefit.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The thing is, it doesn't really benefit anyone. If you're Russia, for instance, it would be better to destroy the entire democratic world than just the United States, and Trump could have done that if he'd just moved more slowly on some of his actions (for instance, if he'd remained quiet about Canada until after our election then we'd be in a very different situation now.) Trump's just an idiot, plain and simple, and the people he surrounds himself with are either idiots themselves or too cowardly to call the idiots out on their idiocy.

It's a mistake to think that either he or his handlers have some kind of master plan and that everything Trump does is the result of expert manoeuvring that just looks like stupidity. That promotes defeatism and gets people to surrender prematurely. As long as people stand up to Trump, he will lose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The way I see, ~~Trump's~~ the Trump Administration's motives are:

(1) Plunder the government of anything of value.

(2) Cause a recession so rich can buy everything up on the market.

(3) Sabotage America geopolitically on behalf of foreign adversaries, most notably Russia.

(4) Cement power in their control and go after any rivals.

Edit: For clarification, I don't think it really matters what part of this is Trump himself versus the people he surrounds himself with and permits as the executive to do what they're doing in their own personal agendas that align with one or more of these 4 points.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Nah.

These are definitely someone's motives but not Trump's.

He's old and tired and petty. All he cares about is his ego, which he supports with power, revenge, and attention.

Trump doesn't have any kind of plan other than waking up every day and stroking his ego.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Just imagine the profits from artificial scarcity, end of times riots and price gouging the ever living shit out of every citizen you can.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you were warned months before, and even before the election. dont act surprised, you thought his only legislation was tax cuts, but it wasnt , he was pushing things further along the line for PUTIN.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (18 children)

The world has no appetite for his big beautiful luxury goods store.

USA used to be the managers and leaders of these factories, now he wants them to be the grunt workers and for some reason people are all for it.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can't make long term plans for building factories, sourcing raw materials and hiring people if the Dynamite Monkey in Chief can blow it all up on a whim.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

It was never possible even under normal circumstances

load more comments
view more: next ›