this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
1256 points (100.0% liked)

News

28309 readers
3889 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 229 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This would be amazing if he can do it. At least he's promising good changes vs trump promising judgment day on day one...

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It is weird that they dicked around for 4 years on this, though.

Still, vote blue, your vassals beg you (Australian here).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daikiki@lemmy.world 149 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just pack the goddamn court. There's ONE conservative justice on the Supreme Court who was appointed by a president who came to power having received more votes than his opponent, and that's Clarence Thomas, the man whose loyalties can be bought with a luxury vacation and whose wife aided and abetted insurrectionist traitors.

The ENTIRE conservative wing of the Supreme Court is illegitimate. Every single one of them. And you know what? Thanks to the GOP, it only takes 50 votes to approve a supreme court justice. It used to be sixty, but they changed the rules so they could more conveniently destroy America.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 95 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I’m wishing he had packed the courts when he had the chance.

[–] praechaox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Yep, exactly. I remember seeing many warnings in 2021-22 saying that then was the right time to pack the courts. Establishment Dems twiddled their thumbs while insisting that everyone everywhere needs to follow proper decorum and procedure. And now look what happened with the string of terrible Supreme Court decisions.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 37 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The fact that the US has to 'pack the courts' to get anything through shows how broken the system is.

Not that any other country is better but still, you'd think judges should be impartial and resistant to influence, and yet you get Clarence offering up his chocolate starfish for a vacation in a warm climate

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Fuck procedure. Dems need to act instead of just talking about shit. I'm legit terrified for this next election.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_artic_one@programming.dev 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He never had the chance, Manchin was pretty outspoken about his opposition to it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 83 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Only if the ranking is applied at the state level AND the national level. I'm not going to throw away my vote or my delegate's vote.

[–] stickyShift@midwest.social 50 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why not get rid of delegates altogether while we're at it?

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes please. As someone who isn't in a swing state, I would like my vote to matter.

And a popular vote means citizens in other countries could vote (Puerto Rico).

Also, prisoners should get a vote.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

And a popular vote means citizens in other countries could vote (Puerto Rico).

I just want to point out that Puerto Rico is not a separate country, it is part of the United States. The people there are US Citizens just like those in the 50 States. However, as a territory they do not have the same representation in government or federal support as a full State.

A lot of people get this wrong. Including some Border Patrol officers. They don't exactly hire the most educated for the Frontline positions, that's pretty clear from the stupid clearly wrong or illegal shit CBP ends up doing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 68 points 8 months ago (10 children)

Bush full of birds, but our hands are still empty...

Biden had four fucking years to do something, half of that time Dems controlled both House and Senate.

But he doesn't start talking about it till right before the election as a promise for something he'll "look into" in January

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 95 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Dems controlled the Senate with the slimmest majority possible. One fucker that owns a coal company was able to tank all meaningful climate bills and there was nothing Biden or anyone else could do about it. You can forget about any progressive policies in that environment, lol. Biden did well with the tools he was given.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Dems controlled the Senate with the slimmest majority possible

And four years ago Biden wouldnt shut up about how only he could work with a Republican Senate.

Long before we dreamed if 50 seats.

As soon as that was on the table, it switched to 50 accomplishes everything. And almost immediately after we got that. Biden said it wasn't enough

Three big goalpost moves in like 6 months, that shit is noticable to voters and some can remember the last election, and not take Biden on his word again.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You’re supposed to be angry at the people preventing progress, not the people trying to create progress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 31 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I love how people blame Biden for shit the racist rapist with 34 felonies did. The amount of mental gymnastics that requires is amazing. Unless you're not a real person and at this point, I kinda hope you're not.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 28 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You’re misplacing the blame, friend

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

Biden has been successful at getting bipartisan legislation passed over the last few years. That doesn't mean that everything can be done. It horse shit that you think that because he wasn't able to convince any Republicans and lost a turn coat and coal barron that it's his fault, or that he mislead with his "working across the aisle" comments.

To address one of your other comments, this shit is the reason people might believe your a Trump supporter. The same shit rhetoric day in and day out. There's being critical and there's being beneficial to Trump. You frequently sit on the Trump benefits side of comments.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not sure why you're getting negative votes. You're right. But Dems still haven't learned that the days of working across party lines is a dream from a bygone era.

Old man dreams.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago (9 children)

It's very disingenuous to say the Democratic party controlled the Senate while having the House majority. The Senate was 48 Democratic, 2 Independents who caucused with the Democratic Senators, and 50 Republicans with the VP casting tie-breakong votes. Very little legislation could be passed because of the filibuster, which needed 51 votes to reform and both Machines and Lineman stating they absolutely would not go along with that. The Senate could approve most nominees, and pass reconciliation (ie 3 types of budget-related bills) once a year. They had no path the expand the court or codify Roe or anything like that with the "majority" they had. We need either 51 Senators who will amend the filibuster (or get rid of it) or 61 Senators to overcome the filibuster to really have the ability to get anything substantial done.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org 67 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Make every US citizen a Supreme Court justice when they turn 18. There’s nothing in the constitution that says you can’t do that. Put cases up to popular vote every year or two. Also, whatever law passed to do this would count as senate approval because who’s going to strike it down… the Supreme Court?

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There’s nothing in the constitution that says dogs can't play basketball.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This meme is great but it drives me crazy. There are certainly multiple eligibility requirements to play on a school basketball team, including age and being a registered student, which would prevent a dog from qualifying.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is hilarious. I'm sure someone with more bandwidth than me can point out a dozen reasons why this is bad, but fuck if it isn't funny and appealing.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah but what we have now is clearly bad too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 55 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

PACK THE FUCKING COURT! You're in that office to serve the people not the fucking system. Doesn't matter anyway republicans are going to destroy everything they can get their hands on.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, why would you try to actually solve a problem instead of just applying a band-aid that the next administration can rip of again (by incresing the size of the court again)?

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 20 points 8 months ago

Every solution that works within the system would be a band-aid. The entire system is band-aids. The government set up by a group of wealthy white men almost 250 years ago for a population 130 times smaller than it is now simply does not and cannot work in today's world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 52 points 8 months ago (31 children)

What a nice thought, too bad Biden didn’t do anything over two years ago when it would have actually mattered.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not that it will get passed now, but if he did that 2 years ago, everyone would be saying that there isn’t any good indication these things are truly a huge issue. Now that it is out that they are taking bribes, working directly in conflicts of interests, and clearly doing things in contradiction to duty, there is a much stronger case.

Making a change with the fundamental design of the of the separation of powers will always be, nearly, impossible, and completely so without strong demonstration of why they need to be changed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 52 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully he succeeds. The court is fucked

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I can't imagine how he possibly will. R is happy just the way things are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 47 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No talkie talkie. Fucking do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The reforms backed by Biden would need congressional approval and the constitutional amendment would require ratification by 38 states in a process that seems nearly impossible to succeed.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why doesn't he just bypass congress and call it an official act?

[–] Bremmy@lemmy.ml 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He's a "soft" Democrat that cares about "optics" 🙄

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PenisWenisGenius 41 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

inb4 the Supreme Court rules that new laws made about the Supreme Court are illegal. Why even stop there. They can simply rule that ACKTCHUALLY the US is a monarchy and Clarence Thomas is in charge of it all.

[–] toasteecup@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm down to commit regicide

[–] PenisWenisGenius 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Become ungovernable instead, whatever that means to you. Refusing to have kids and then living as flat as possible so you can smoke weed is one example of social behavior that harms their agenda a lot more than committing suicide does.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

The most amazing ideas always come when the election draws close. But he can't implement any of them because there is no time.

Good thing Biden already fulfilled his previous election promises. Student loans are a thing of the past.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

Stack the fucking court Joe. I don't care if there are 500 Supreme Court Justices.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] terraced_wildcat303@api.clubsall.com 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Would have been good if he was working last 3.5 years too, now doing damage control is too little too late

[–] Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The problem ofc being that congress fights him tooth and nail for anything he wants done, but yeah... all his fault.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (3 children)

He needs to push hard and fast.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments