this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
377 points (100.0% liked)

Today I Learned

20906 readers
1980 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 148 points 7 months ago (14 children)

It's also not the Tree of Knowledge, it's the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. And that presents a problem:

If Adam and Eve did not yet understand what is and is not a good thing to do, they could not possibly have understood that it was not good to disobey God. Eve did not know the serpent was evil. And yet he punishes Adam and Eve for doing what they did not realize was wrong of them to do.

[–] [email protected] 104 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Go a step before that. Why'd God put the tree there in the first place?

God created sin, introduced it to humanity, and ensured evil would spread across the earth.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 7 months ago (3 children)

True. He even admits it in Isaiah:

Isaiah 45:7 - I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Can't have light without dark. Can't have good without evil. Otherwise you just have boring stagnation. God likes chaos and excitement, not boring safety.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Why can't you have light without dark? If you sped up all the molecules in the universe to the point that they were all radiating heat, you would have light without dark.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago

Plus, admitting that God cannot create light without dark or good without evil means admitting God is not omnipotent.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago

You win this round, science.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Only if that heat radiation would be evenly distributed - otherwise you would have a gradient which still results in duality of light/dark

There are also places that are relatively empty, which would result in a more typical darkness

Also, speeding everything in existence up to the point of luminance is kind of tricky, what with natural law and all

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Christians: God is Lawful Good.
God: Actually more like Chaotic Neutral.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

*Chaotic evil

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It always complete the picture to understand that the creation myth used in the Bible was not Jewish or Christian in origin. It was an appropriation of a pagan myth of the era. Like most Christianity, it is just a syncretism to make the cult palatable to the newly recruited. "Oh yes, that thing that you already believe in was totally our god".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (7 children)

I think all major religious myths, like languages themselves, are derivative of previous myths on some level. Sure, there was a proto-mythology at some point, but it expanded, changed, etc. until it divided into multiple religions. And, of course, Judaism beget Christianity beget Islam, but all of them took other religious myths that were popular at the time and wove them into the tapestry.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

I think they mean more like in say Europe where Christianity came in, took cultural events etc for other religions and claimed it as their own rather to make conversion easier.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And yet he punishes Adam and Eve for doing what they did not realize was wrong of them to do.

You say this like punishing people who don't understand the rules isn't a fundamental part of christianity.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Adam and Eve was pre-Christianity though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Consider that it is the knowledge itself that cast us down.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It doesn't matter. They were being punished for something they didn't know not to do.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Also God kinda lied to them or at least deceived them by saying they'll die if they eat the fruit from memory.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

The Gnostic interpretation always made more sense to me. The serpent being a form of Christ.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I think apple used to be a generic term for fruits.

It is especially apparent for exotic fruits, for example here is a list of fruits from the Caribbean, none of then are related to the European apple:

  • golden apple
  • wax apple/rose apple
  • pineapple
  • sugar apple
  • custard apple
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Potato (Pomme de Terre, Erdapfel)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

It can, but I'm not sure if that explains why it's often represented as an apple in the west.

Here's what Wikipedia has to say:

In Western Europe, the fruit was often depicted as an apple. This was possibly because of a misunderstanding of – or a pun on – two unrelated words mālum, a native Latin noun which means 'evil' (from the adjective malus), and mâlum, another Latin noun, borrowed from Greek μῆλον, which means 'apple'. In the VulgateGenesis 2:17 describes the tree as "de ligno autem scientiae boni et mali": "but of the tree [literally 'wood'] of knowledge of good and evil" (mali here is the genitive of malum). There is nothing in the Bible indicating that the forbidden fruit of the tree of knowledge was an apple.[10]

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My German professor even mentioned the archaic apfelsine for the citrus orange.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Apfelsine is not archaic. Very widely used today, at least here in the south.

Also, it literally means "Chinese apple" lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 7 months ago (4 children)

My money's on it being a pomegranate originally. Apples wouldn't have existed in the fertile crescent over 2000 years ago. Pomegranates are also messy and look bloody when eating them, fitting the "carnal knowledge" side of the story. I've heard other people suggest they could have been dates, but pomegranates seem like a way better fit for the story.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know why but I want to say persimmon. They're worth getting tossed out of paradise for atnleast

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Imagine them getting an underripe one and just getting that nasty dry mouth feeling AND getting booted from paradise to top it off.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Adam and Eve never once complained about how freaking annoying it is to eat a pomegranate because 90% of it is dried bark and every tiny seed has its own inedible seed so I doubt that's what it was.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago

I like the "magic mushroom" theory.

I won't say I believe it. But I like it.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Apple is probably the most common interpretation because a lot of languages use it as kind of a vague fruit term, and the Bible has been retranslated and reinterpreted roughly one million times. The French call potatoes apples

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

Including English: æppel meant any kind of fruit, which is why you have names like pineapple and elephant apple.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The french call potatoes earth apples. Pomme de terre.

It is also an older german term for them, though I believe austria still uses it: Erdapfel.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It was probably butt. Buttfruit. Eating ass was the forbidden fruit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

its like a banana except you have suck out the fruit from one end

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It actually being a durian would have been too on the nose.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

The good thing about fiction is if there is a gap, you can fill it with your own headcanon

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

I've heard that before apples, pomegranates were the assumed go-to.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Isn't it a birds and the bees story translated through a religious conservative lense... The forbidden fruit is sex.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

It's knowledge of good and evil and it says that quite literally in Genesis, but fundies say all kinds of dumb stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

It's been depicted as various things in old art and literature. Apple is very common. But you also find figs, grapes, pomegranates, and occasionally pears. Probably some others I missed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It’s common knowledge Mary Magdalene was a prostitute. I’m not sure why because it doesn’t say that anywhere in the Bible.

Well, I do. It was the easiest way to suppress women’s power in the church and in general.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think there was a non-canonical gospel that said so. And yes, the early church seemed to be relatively liberal with women's rights. A lot of that got clawed back with later additions and choices of what books to include in the biblical canon.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›