this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
162 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9424 readers
1683 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I can blame the parent for bad parenting and call myself informed and everyone else should be ... because I know about bats carrying rabies

But I also know that most people have no clue that any of this can happen .... it's the first case of someone dying from rabies in Ontario from an infection that originated in Ontario since 1967 .... people have no clue that this is even possible in this day in age

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/rabies-death-1.7341335

About eight or ten years ago I woke up one night in my cottage to a bat flying around my place. It was dark inside and I saw this thing fluttering around in my room. I opened a window and let it out and never thought anything of it. About a year later, I happened to be reading some stuff about rabies .... the hair in the back of my neck went up and it's freaked me out since.

After that bat in my room, I never went for treatment, I never got checked out and I never thought anything of it. It's been about ten years and I keep worrying that some day I'll start feeling the effects of it. I think most people in Ontario would do the same because everyone thinks we got rid of rabies decades ago or that it is a third world disease that isn't possible here.

I feel terrible for that parent .... death from rabies is a horrible way to die and it happened to this child with their parents watching it all happen.

I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy ... let alone someone I would accuse of bad parenting.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Quick heads up that we do have effective treatments UNTIL you start exhibiting symptoms, after that you can’t really be cured anymore and would just have to live with it (and manage the symptoms until it kills you shortly after)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

I can blame the parent for bad parenting and call myself informed and everyone else should be ... because I know about bats carrying rabies

Most provinces and the federal's health protocols no longer recommend automatic treatment for "bat in room" situations. Only if there's reasonable doubt of having been bitten. I've been there and I really had to advocate to the ER doctor that there was no way for me to know.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The CDC guidelines are a bit confusing too, like is just being in a house common behavior, as in the part about keeping bats out, or a sign of rabies as in an earlier part? Should you check for physical contact or just go get tested? (And in the US, will your insurance cover the test without symptoms showing?) Should you get the fucking plague beast out of your house while avoiding contact, or try to catch it for testing?

https://www.cdc.gov/rabies/prevention/bats.html

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I thought by the time it is detectable in tests on a person, that person is already terminal. My understanding is if you have any chance of exposure from an animal you skip the tests and go get the shots. IDK about insurance.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Get shots, pay health insurance. Dont get shots, life insurance pays your loved ones.

Macabre and sadly true.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Or be in Canada and just get shots to be safe. It’s $250 as a precautionary shot before travel but if you have suspected exposure it will be free.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

My life insurance pays a hell of a lot better than my health insurance does.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I agree and I was just being cynical about health insurance companies denying care for cruelly stupid reasons. Although I remember some old TV shows where "if the animal can be quickly caught and it tests negative for rabies, the child won't have to undergo the painful series of abdominal shots." Not sure if the treatment is still as miserable as portrayed.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Horrible. Understandable that a parent may not know the risk involved.

Only reason I know was when I worked at a summer camp they hammered into us that if a bat was found in a cabin we had to catch it for testing, or else everyone staying in that cabin would get rabies shots.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I assume we would be ok if it didn't bite us?

Edit: no get tested. Apparently they attack when humans are sleeping and can leave no trace.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Yeah, state of the art may have changed since then, but since you can't see the bite and a test on a human wouldn't show anything until it's too late, the options were either have a lab test the bat or get precautionary rabies shots.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I try not to judge, but I’m also utterly confused as to why the parents wouldn’t immediately have brought the child in for the shot after finding the bat, visible bite or not…

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

To tell the truth I wouldn't have thought about it. A stray deranged dog or racoon would raise alarm bells, but we set bats here at night always, and didn't consider the risk. Oops

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (8 children)

No scratches, no bite. Why would they?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bats have tiny teeth and it's possible to be bitten without there being any visible mark. You should always go for treatment if you have had an interaction with a bat. Better safe than dying one of the worst ways possible.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Most commonly they bite you while you're sleeping, so you don't know

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My thinking would be why risk not getting checked out? Unfortunately worst case scenario happened this time :(

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The indication for testing according the CDC is a bite.

The rabies test is cheap. Could have tested the kid or the bat, but again why would they do it if there's no indication for exposure. This was the first case in the province of someone being infected with rabies inside their own home since 1967.

When you hear hoofbeats you don't think it's zebras.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

You can't test the kid, only the bat. So if they didn't catch it testing is a no go.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

As soon as a rabies test comes back positive, you have a death sentence.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How do you think the child got rabies in this situation?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Obviously they overlooked a scratch or a bite. Rabies isn't airborne.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it drooled into their open mouth or something. Or onto their hand and later they picked their nose.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Sounds possible. Bats are mammals, maybe it sneezed, covered, but didn't wash it's hands, gave the kid a high five, and then the kid wiped a booger out of his eye with it.

Poor kid, never had a chance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Heartbreaking

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This you?

No scratches, no bite. Why would they?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

What do you mean? Yes. They checked the kid over and saw nothing. Obviously there was an exposure that either left no mark, left a mark that appeared normal, or the parents didn't see it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I try not to judge, but I am going to make an exception in this case.

Bad parents plain and simple. That child deserved better.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Some people aren't educated in these things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Some people aren’t educated in these things.

Tell that to the dead child who deserved better than ignorant parents that didn't even care enough to do a Google search.

Ignorance is not an excuse.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

It isn’t protocol for the hospitals to give the shot for a bat in the room. Probably would have gone to the hospital and been turned away.
And it’s easy after the fact to say oh should have done this. As they say hindsight is 20/20.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, the takeaway from this is, "We need some public service announcements about bats," and "The healthcare protocol needs to be updated so that a shot is given if a bat is found in a room where someone was asleep or otherwise may have been bitten without being conscious of it," not "These are bad parents."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It isn’t protocol for the hospitals to give the shot for a bat in the room. Probably would have gone to the hospital and been turned away.

Or they would have gone to the hospital and had the Doctor find the bite/scratch that led to the rabies infection.

And it’s easy after the fact to say oh should have done this. As they say hindsight is 20/20.

Would you be saying this if the child was left in a hot car? Unattended in the bath? Found unsecured chemicals under the sink?

As I said, ignorance is no excuse for a dead child.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You’re obviously not a parent. Downvoted and blocked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ignorance is not an excuse.

If no one has ever told them that some bats carry rabies how would they know to Google anything when they find a bat in the house? It's not something that is taught in school and I've never seen or heard a PSA talking about it in Ontario.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

If no one ever told them the dangers of hot cars, would you be arguing this if the child died in one? If no one ever told them to not leave a child unattended in the bath, would you be arguing this when the child drowned? If no one ever told them to properly secure chemicals, and the child drinks them would you still be arguing for ignorance?

Lots of things aren't taught in schools. Many don't have wide reaching PSA's.

None of that changes the fact that a child died from a very preventable illness because the parents didn't think.

Ignorance is not an excuse for a dead child.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Little known fact groundhogs are also rabies vectors

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

He just popped out, saw his shadow, pulled out a switchblade, and then started running straight towards us

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Only a handful of people (20ish) have ever survived without getting an antiviral shot before symptoms presented.

And it’s a pretty horrific way to die (absolutely dehydrated and needing fluid but gagging and choking if offered a drink).

If I ever got it I’d want to be put in a coma while my immune system tried to knock it out and euthanized if I didn’t recover reasonably.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

When I was young the fear was put into us by my parents. The Cugo movie really reinforced it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

A lot of people have a lot of strong opinions around here so, as someone who's been in a bat in room situation with ambiguous contact potential let me point you to Quebec's Health Ministry's Post Exposition Prophylaxis guidelines:

Vacciner les personnes ayant eu une exposition significative à une source potentiellement rabique.

Une exposition significative est une morsure, une griffure ou un contact de la salive ou du LCR d’un mammifère potentiellement rabique avec une plaie fraîche (ayant saigné ou suinté depuis moins de 24 heures) ou avec une muqueuse.

L’exposition significative se définit comme suit :

Chauve‑souris : présence des 2 conditions suivantes :

Contact physique reconnu avec la chauve‑souris; Morsure, griffure ou contact de la salive de la chauve‑souris avec une plaie fraîche (ayant saigné ou suinté depuis moins de 24 heures) ou avec une muqueuse non exclu. La PPE n’est pas indiquée en l’absence de contact physique reconnu (ex. : chauve‑souris trouvée dans la maison sans qu’on ait eu connaissance d’un contact physique avec l’animal). Si la description des faits ne peut être obtenue auprès d’une personne fiable (ex. : jeune enfant ou personne intoxiquée), il faut chercher à savoir si des éléments de l’histoire laissent croire à un tel contact, comme des cris ou des pleurs soudains ou inhabituels ou bien une lésion cutanée compatible avec une morsure de chauve‑souris (plaie punctiforme comparable à la piqûre d’une aiguille hypodermique, d’un diamètre inférieur ou égal à 1 mm, peu ou pas douloureuse).

https://www.msss.gouv.qc.ca/professionnels/vaccination/piq-vaccins/rage-vaccin-contre-la-rage/

Translation of the bold section: PPE is not indicated in the absence of known physical contact (ex: a bat found in the house without knowledge of physical contact).

See also this triage chart:

https://www.msss.gouv.qc.ca/aide-decision-app/accueil.php?situation=Rage

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›