this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
895 points (100.0% liked)

Games

37520 readers
1378 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 86 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I mean...

All of those mini consoles (NES mini, SNES mini) are already SOCs with an emulator.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Corps are shameless. No amount of hypocrisy is enough to make them reconsider their evil.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 84 points 5 months ago (10 children)

Eww extremely embarrassing that they used Windows.

[–] kworpy@lemm.ee 21 points 5 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] doctortran@lemm.ee 81 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (16 children)

Just for the record, this is exactly what any museum would do, because they're not going to actually run anything on the original hardware. Those systems are part of the collection, and it behooves a museum to not put any wear on them.

Also because emulators can be managed remotely.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 66 points 5 months ago

Any other museum wouldn't be a hypocrite for doing so.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago (2 children)

In other words, emulators are crucial for game preservation? This shows that Nintendo knows that, and when they say it's not the case, they're not simply wrong, they're lying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is a "Museum" run by Nintendo in Japan. Meaning they could have used or even created more original hardware to run the titles, but instead cut costs by using the same Emulators that they're hoping to take down.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Them being the original creator of the products doesn't necessarily imply that they still have running production processes for every product that they ever made.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

If I obtain all the original schematics and software and make 1 Nintendo internals for commercial purposes wothout their permission it would be illegal.

If they do it, it costs them the price of a couple of family dinners at most.

This museum IS NINTENDO. They are the only people allowed to do this job correctly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (18 children)

That is highly depending on the type of Museum. Many Videogame and Computer Museums (at least in Germany) are showing the real Hardware running, some are even allowing the visitors to use and play at the old machines. And yes, they are often very used to repairing the hardware too.

I would expect from Nintendo that they would show and use real hardware in their museum, and not some emulators. Because I can see the games on an emulator at home (for example using my Switch Online or my SNES Classic), I don't need a museum for that experience.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 45 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nintendo: Emulation is illegal, criminal, and you should never ever do it. If you do, we will sue your ass, send the Pinks, and then shit fury on you!!!

Also Nintendo:


Needless to say, I will not be buying an alarm clock today.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (5 children)

That's not at all Nintendo's philosophy.

They literally included emulation starting with the wii

So it is more of a rules for thee but not for me situation. Not you should never ever do it but you should only do it on our hardware with our emulators

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PunchingWood@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I was joking when in a previous post about the museum I said it better not run on any emulators..

So.. Why aren't they selling said emulators and roms? I ain't gonna travel half the world to play one in an overpriced museum.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Um... they are, and have been for almost 20 years, since the Wii. Or the N64 depending on how you look at it.

What did you think Virtual Console was? How about the NES and SNES mini? What about the "Nintendo Game Pass" or whatever they're calling it?

Animal Crossing's original Japan release had NES games in it, and so did the GC rerelease/psuedosequel we got internationally too.


Even better: During the Wii era, the Wiis at the Nintendo Store in New York City ran official Nintendo made software to load games off a connected hard drive, so you could play multiple of their new releases without workers having to switch discs.


It has always been about attempts to prevent piracy and keep control over how people access their games for Nintendo, and they are roughly 10 years behind the curve on modern tech trends.

Either stop supporting them or get used to it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'd bet the emulators in use are actually publicly available ones. Not anything Nintendo made. Adding to the hypocrisy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I can see Nintendo shutting down his own museum for piratery.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (5 children)

if its under GPL couldn't they be forced to disclose the source code?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe the emulator maker should sue

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But they own it. I thought even I could download a ROM if I have the actual game no?

[–] RoosterBoy@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago

No, at least in the US, you can only back up your own ROM if you own the game, not download someone else's backup. The real problem here is that Nintendo's (idiotic) stance is ALL emulation/backups are piracy and here they are being hypocrites about it.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

ITT: people think emulators are only the ones you can download

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

In this comment: Someone who is not familiar with the history of Nintendo selling pirated versions of their own games and ripping off pirate emulators then passing them as their own.

[–] TeoTwawki@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

or the history of nintendo falsely claiming that emulation itself was an illegal practice when trying to bully and scare people into submission...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments