this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
85 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9621 readers
806 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I, for one, would welcome Cascadia and New Amsterdam.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Can Minnesota and Michigan come too?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Only if your hockey players play for our national team.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Sorry, do you mean the Canucks or the Canadiens?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

The local hockey scene would be ecstatic, lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Ann Arbor, MI has to stay behind.

And only one NFL team.

Sorry Vikings, you're gonna have to relocate.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

If we get Vermont our monopoly supply of maple syrup will be complete!

Soon, soon our schemes come to fruition!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago

our GDP would explode overnight lol

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

Yeah we will pass. Not interested in having Americans be able to move freely through our borders thanks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (4 children)

This is not a possibility. You can't break away from the USA as a whole.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago

Just like presidents can't foment insurrections and then be able to be president again. Anything is possible

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Not even sure why you're being downvoted. Ignore the historical precedent of Lincoln v Davis and the 698,000 Americans who died arguing the issue. Neglect the practical legalism of a national schism or the large rump caucus within your state that is diametrically opposed to the idea.

Even assuming a velvet divorce, the land still isn't going anywhere. New York will be the same distance from DC as its always been. You'll still be joined at the hip to the petrodollar, the interstate highway and airport and rail networks, and the English language. The policies a President Trump implements will still cascade into the New York economy, whether he's your President or Eric Adams or Andrew Cuomo gets to be The Liberated Republic of New York's new Glorious Leader.

What exactly have you solved? You're now two Senators and Twenty-Six House Reps less influential in the world's most powerful governing body, and you've ceded the corresponding EC votes... all so your new national leadership can, what? Suck up to Trump like Trudeu, Macron, Keir Starmer, and every other world leader have been for the last month? Or is the plan to realign with Iran, Cuba, and China?

Give me a fucking break.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Agree to the realities you described.

What you'd gain would be on other topics, like abortion, and healthcare.

I am not advocating for secession, but I think the authors would be aware of the limitations you mentioned and instead focused on other wins.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What you’d gain would be on other topics, like abortion, and healthcare.

States already have implemented their own healthcare solutions. Massachusetts implemented Obamacare under Mitt Romney, ffs. States like California and New York aren't incapable of doing Universal Coverage or NHS, like Canada or the UK, because they lack the autonomy. They're unwilling to do so, because even the brightest blue legislatures/governors are still tied up in the corrupt for-profit health care systems.

That, and they've devoted enormous chunks of their budget to the domestic security state (cops / prisons / state surveillance) which cuts into what the legislature is willing to spend overall.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

I mean to say they would be bound by the standards of Canada (good better or worse as they may be)

Also I thought you were following me then realized I replied to you in two threads. Lol. Lemmybesmol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Sure they can

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

They can definitely try. It's not entirely clear if there would be any political will to stop them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Hooray! Unregistered handguns for all!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Canada can annex all the liberal states, and then we can buy all the red states for pennies on the dollar when they collapse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Nice theatrics by regime whores... now let's see what happens if a pleb tried something like this...