this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
48 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

30723 readers
1795 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Rule 6. Locking.

Edit: Unlocking based on argument that this post is general rather than about the recent US election (OP to edit title). Edit 2: OP has chosen not to edit title. Locking.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  1. They don't get to complain because they refused to do the bare minimum.
  2. Contribute to the many reasons I had to leave my home country. Not sure it would be different otherwise, but going immigrant without a fallback plan wasn't pleasant.
  3. Mandatory voting - I'm for it as long as it's Australian style - no severe punishment, just light fines. Enough to quietly annoy people into voting.
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

How is it better if someone just goes and circles a random name on the list because its mandatory? If someone doesn't follow politics and isn't educated enough to pick a good candidate, or motivated enough to research them, I think it's better to not vote at all than to give it up to either chance or a superficial gut feeling based on constant propaganda barrage. A person that votes like that just makes your vote less impactful, statistically speaking.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because they won't do it randomly. Being forced to participate will make people think: "If I have to do it I might as well choose X". If you ever participated in a mandatory school activity you might know the feeling. You might not have chosen to do it of your own free will, but now that you're there let's think what to make of it.

Also politics is not just voting. Politics is almost every choice you make every day. If I have to drag someone kicking and screaming until they understand it so be it.

Also also, voting randomly is not useless. Keeping the political system functional is preferable to forever pining for a perfect candidate. A "perfect glorious leader" doesn't exist, random votes make those emotionally swayed by charismatic leaders less likely to gain a majority.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a lot of assumptions that I can't agree are inherently true. Forcing people to participate might not make them think at all beyond fulfilling the duty and not paying a fine, and random votes might not balance out the charismatic leaders at all - if anything the charismatic populist leaders that focus on good PR over substance will probably gather up more of these uneducated "just circle something" voters than the others. It is where/why marketing and commercials work so well in the first place and I'd rather not give even more power to this type of brainwashing, it is a popularity contest enough as it is.

If anything, I'd make it so in order for people's votes to count they need to show at least a very basic understanding of what they are voting for and what are the implications of it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

One of you depends on people wanting aganecy in their own lives and a fair world, the other depends on everyone being literally too dumb and selfish to do the bare minimum to keep society from collapsing without a gun held to their head.

I know which world I would rather be living in

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Make them take the "Walk of Shame" like in the GoT.

No fines. Just make it even easier and better process. Mail in ballots and a federal holiday for the Presidential election.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They should shut up about politics. Not voting is literally a declaration that you don't care who governs you. Voting is what gives you the right to complain about the government. If you didn't vote, shut up.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

They should shut up about politics

Not participating in fake, anti-democratic spectacles (somehow) "disqualifies" one from talking about politics?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

This is just ignorance and whiny entitlement. Your "fake anti-democratic spectacle" is the hard-won achievement of generations of people who came before you. Boring liberal representative democracy is the exception in world history. Most people in the world have never had the opportunity that you have to influence your government. Not good enough for you? Well then get off your ass and do something to make it better. The very least you can do is vote, because out of two candidates, one is always better than another. If you can't be bothered to do even that, then I for one don't care what you have to say about politics.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Elections might be skewed, they might be giving voters a rather narrow choice, they might depend on who's got the bigger campaign fund, they might not offer ranked choice, yet with all that --they're still one of the most accessible, actionable things the average person can do to control their nation's future. Passing on that is not justifiable, because we should be doing everything we can, and that includes voting. I used to be cynical like you, but ~~then I took an arr~~ I mean, we can't afford that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Decisions are made by those that show up. If you didn’t vote, you don’t get to bitch when the results aren’t what you wanted.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Hard not to bitch when, as a citizen of another country, I could never vote, and yet people here still have to deal with the consequences.

You better believe the rest of the world will be bitching.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Backwards.

You put american electoralism up on a pedestal and tout its sanctity and your faith in the process. The process yielded Trump. If you truly believe in the sanctity of american electoralism, you now have no grounds to complain.

If you vote, you don't get to complain.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Buy a helmet. Wear it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

And we will all laugh at you for that hot take. Next time get off your ass and participate if you have an opinion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Better than voting for who looks the best on TV, or any of the other ways people vote without being fully informed. I'm sometimes forced to leave sections blanks because I cannot find anything about the candidates (I don't know why my state vote on judges, the only way to find out if they any are good is to spend 100% of your time in court rooms, reading decisions, and so on all year)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

local bar associations publish judge evaluations before the election

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you trust them. Where I live the bar chooses the person on the ballot and we only get a up or down. Thus any evaluation they do is by definiton a conflict of interest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm largely disappointed in them. The one time they were needed the most, they didn't care to show up. Like, you do not have to be knee deep in politics to understand what's at stake and who's running. Take a good solid 30 minutes out of your life, to research and study the candidates, the issues and think of the future of the country's direction if either candidate and their party got voted in.

If they'd do just that, they'd probably have a better understanding. But they didn't do that. They thought the 2024 election was in the bag and feel they didn't need to do their part. Well, the results speak for themselves.

And nothing much more needs to be said or done, they've sentenced themselves to the mess that's to happen a week and a half from now. Just as much as all of the brainwashed and braindead conservatives who actively voted for fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They’re definitely part of the reason why we are where we are. Not the only reason, but definitely a big part of it.

Additionally, I’ll say that their refusal to vote isn’t the protest they think it is. All it did was tell the powers that be that they trust everyone else to choose for them and that they’re fine with whoever wins.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They actively brought about political disaster through idiotic, self-absorbed assholery and they will be licking it up for four long fucking years.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

They actively brought about political disaster

You want to blame the people who didn't participate in anti-democratic spectacles for the existence of said anti-democratic spectacles?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As an anarchist, I respect their decision in the sense that participating in the state is fighting for the state.

I would tell them to vote though, and I myself vote when its needed, to avoid getting utter bastards as 'legitimate' leaders. Here in France it's even easier because I'm not given the choice between only capitalists and fascists, i can vote for light versions of socialists.

I'm against fines, even light ones. If they are not strictly scaled to income, they always strike harder people who are struggling already than richer ones. And even if they do, it's not fair to be forced to participate in a form of politics you don't want.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Thank you. Sadly, the concept of legitimizing a government isn't something most people understand enough to appreciate.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Perhaps they would feel more inclined to vote if we had more then two viable political parties to choose from.

With a more representative electoral system, people would be free to vote outside the two party system with no spoiler effect. Their vote would count, even if their preference didn’t win.

Who could possibly be against democracy? Republicans? Of course.

How about the democratic party? What is their opinion of democracy? Will they work to ensure their constituents are represented fully? Every day that ticks by without electoral reform in blue states is another day the democrats elevate their party above the needs of the country.

Videos on alternative voting systemsFirst Past The Post voting (What most states use currently)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo

Videos on alternative electoral systems we can try out.

Alternative vote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y3jE3B8HsE

Ranked Choice voting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Z2fRPRkWvY

Range Voting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3GFG0sXIig

Single Transferable Vote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI

STAR voting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-mOeUXAkV0

Mixed Member Proportional representation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT0I-sdoSXU

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

There was a choice. You failed to choose the better option, and thus must accept the worst.

Simple-as.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

If they wanted a certain outcome but didn't do jacks shit, with almost no exceptions as to why they didn't vote, and complain about it, they are getting absolutely zero, zilch, notta, nothing in the sympathy department from me.

If you got the ability to vote, even if it's for something as minor as what's for dinner, and you don't vote, don't complain because you didn't do anything.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

They're no worse than (possibly better than) people who voted for whichever party because their parents/newspaper taught/told them to, or because that's who they always vote for and are too lazy, stubborn, peer pressured or insecure to change - i.e. people who claim to be politically literate but don't actually have a clue what they're really voting for.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

People who don’t vote don’t get to complain if things don’t go their way. I mean they can, but it’s pretty silly. It’s like writing a review for a restaurant that your friends have eaten at, but that you haven’t. No one should take that review seriously.

I think voting should be mandatory for people who have registered to vote. I don’t think anyone should be required to register, but if you are registered you should have to vote or be fined, imo.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Should I have thoughts on them?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

and what if government tomorrow or (maybe far future) announced that they will be announcing fines for people who didn't vote in order to maximize participation, would you agree with that decision?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

You mean, as already happens in Australia and Belgium and maybe a few other places.

Seems fair to me. Democracy relies on participation. To not vote is effectively to vote against democracy. Fair enough, but that's a dangerous road to go down. I think there should be a small price to pay for it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't care. Popular vote doesn't get presidents elected, and nobody local ever seems both interested and capable of making significant positive changes, at least that I've seen. It largely feels like theater, and in a race you can't influence between two people pledging to continue genocide I can see why people would throw their hands up and say fuck everything.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Sure, but local offices have a much larger effect on most people's lives and that's where voting can make a change.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Lazy idiots, misguided idiots, deluded idiots who have made every progressive goal more difficult to achieve, just out of reach for the rest of our lives

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Quiet contempt, mostly. Their arguments for doing so, while passionate, simply don’t hold up under scrutiny. However, trying to talk to them about it just strengthens their resolve, so I don’t bother.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (41 children)

simply don’t hold up under scrutiny.

And your arguments FOR participating? Will they hold up under scrutiny?

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

They can live with Brexit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

They probably couldn't afford to miss a day to work, and they know from experience that neither party is going to do anything to change that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I don't personally care if someone voted or not, especially this election.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Everyone get's what they asked for. The thing about the ubiquitous trolley problem is it has clear outcomes. That's why it works. Whatever's happening down the track, here we are. We had a lever we didn't pull. Best learn to live with the choice, because there was a choice.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›