this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
697 points (100.0% liked)

Funny

9674 readers
1041 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Every AI studio ghibli meme is another sign of how useless open AI is

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I cannot tell that this is AI. I thought it was a human's work. I don't believe this is AI. If this is AI, then I have to admit that AI is better than I thought -- not sure why you'd say it's useless.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is absolutely AI generated, friend.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Downvoting not because I disagree with you, but because you provide no evidence.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

~~I'm sorry, that's against my terms of service~~ whoops, sorry. I meant -- thank you for educating me about the latest human trend.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Rather than calling people dumb, has it ever occurred to you that maybe they're simply ignorant of a very recent AI trend?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Everyone should be permanently online and eating all the new info released in the last few hours about the stupidest latest trends. Obviously.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I can't recall memes being hand drawn in Ghibli style until they made Ghibli style AI reproducible a couple of days ago. So let's just say that the probability of a lot of memes using Ghibli style art going forward is probably close to 99.9% certain of being AI generated.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You're almost certainly right, but there's nothing in the image that gives it away as obviously AI, is there?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you zoom in there's a number of tells. Just to name a few, The man's right hand thumb, the ends of the sticks, the bottom girls hands, the fusing of the boy's hands, the boy's left leg. Just gotta look close and think.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Looking at the background also tends to help. If you look at the city, it looks realistic at first. But once you zoom in, it makes a lot less sense.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sure, let me believe you, a random person on the internet. In all seriousness, I could believe either way, but you just saying that without any explanation is pretty useless.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It has to do with the "flatness" of the general composition. It reeks of AI. A human usually needs to intervene to prevent that.

Are you happy now?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also there's a weird rectangle in the guy's hands that doesn't match the scene (paper? dollar bill?), the rolled up thing in the ledft corner is clearly a bastardization of a soda bottle and a rolled-up newspaper, and there's some weird white chunk on the middle girl's forehead that feels like it's supposed to be a physical colouring error.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The rectangle is just the gap between his arm and body, isn't it?

The other stuff is odd, but not a smoking gun by any means.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No human in their right mind would put a well kempt dude in a suit into a post apocalyptic comic. It just doesn't make sense.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

This was actually my favourite detail though. It gives the apocalypse this sense of immediacy which I think is important for the message it's trying to tell.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

But it's literally based off of a cartoon with a man in a suit, though: https://www.insidehook.com/culture/story-tom-toro-new-yorker-climate-cartoon

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel so dirty, but it had to be done

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

Yeah, but it's Grave of the Fireflies.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would really suck if they used AI to make this.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Narrator: they used generative models to make this.

PS, AI doesn't exist

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

No they're talking about AL, the man who's behind every 4 second transition of whatever you want into Ghibli. Al is a savant who can crank out a billion renditions of memes turned into South Park characters a second.

He used to be a free man, but the company Open AL decided that his gift was too useful to be squandered so now he sits in a basement chained to a rock as he gets order after order demanding Hatsune Miku feet. He's not even good at drawing feet yet.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Really? That's some serious nitpicking. Colloquial terms exist, man.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's not even only colloquial, it's the scientific term for it.

Edit: Even things that have nothing to do with machine learning or deep learning are AI. i.e. stupid rule based approaches (aka tons of if-else). Deep Learning is a subset of Machine Learning which is a subset of AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd like to think that words have meaning. They should not be used to pump up stock prices. And certain words, like intelligence, deserve respect.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Words have meaning, and the meaning of those words change throughout time, cultures, and even niche circles. In a perfect world, we'd all explain the definition of a word that we are using, but we don't, and we rely on public consensus to determine the meaning of words. People are able to accept this for slang, but for some reason have a hard time accepting that it happens for normal words as well. People have been using AI to mean "any semblance of thought" in tech for a long time. When playing a game against a computer, people have been calling the computer player AI, even back when games were rudimentary.

Of course, I'm as big a hater of AI by the modern definition as anyone, I just think there are a lot of people dying on the hill of "words can't change" when it's a pretty crazy position to hold.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Allen Iverson is a legend.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'd like to out-pedant you: General AI doesn't exist (though there's an argument that perhaps it does now). Computer scientists have used the term AI to refer to all sorts of things from pathfinding to STRIPS to video game enemies imitating human players to machine learning since time immemorial. If your objection is that only humans have intelligence, one could equally argue that only humans compute, so no true Computer exists. Please define intelligence for me if you think otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

This is an insult to life itself.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

What the actual fuck is a "Ghibli studio"

edit: Since yall seem chill with the absolute crime against universe that saying Studio Ghibli backwards is, I've seen most of the movies, I actually know wtf the studio does.

[–] lmmarsano 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Might get farther by searching "Studio Ghibli", the one true way to say it

[–] lmmarsano 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Right: that's the right order.

Do web searches care about word order, though?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Actually, yes they do I'm pretty sure. Since web searches started getting horrible, the old style of searching using only the important words (and in any order) doesn't work very well. Part of adapting to whatever it's doing now, I've found using whole sentences works best, for whatever reason.

Should it? I don't think so. I think the old algorithm was more useful once you've learned how to search. It probably changed because more people with no technical knowledge didn'tknow how to use it properly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Animation company with a very distinct hand drawn style. If you want an introduction, try watching "Grave of the Fireflies". 8.5@10 and 37th best movie according to IMDb.

..😈🔪🫀

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Grave of the fireflies was totally cool

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Tbh, the most surprising thing about this trend is how long it took to be.

load more comments
view more: next ›