this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
259 points (100.0% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

4269 readers
9 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"I was ready to argue that his mindset limits opportunities for women but then I realized I am a misogynistic douche as well"

-Tushar Naahal

[–] [email protected] 164 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This is a prime example of why patriarchy is hurting men too, because what this guy is saying boils down to:

  • We can make them work at any hour of the day because who cares if these guys have any life outside work?
  • We don't have to do any work management, we just call those guys
  • We can send them wherever, whenever
  • We can create a toxic work environment and it's okay to treat guys like shit
  • And those guys don't even complain because they need this job so bad
    Isn't it great?

The statement about "workplace laws" is so telling: Yeah, who cares about treating men with respect and dignity!?
It's not just about discriminating against women, it's also about mistreating men. That's what patriarchy is at its core: Pit men and women against each other and then reap the benefits. It's a "divide and conquer strategy".

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Exactly my impression. And my response? Fuck that shit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Also practices like that reinforce the gendered division of labour. As men get jobs, women are usually left to pick up the slack of care responsibilities. This leaves them financially dependent on those men. So both men and women suffer, but the system leaves women with less agency than men.

(Also nonbinary, queer, and third gender people are treated even worse)

[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 week ago

Men are available 24/7

I‘d like you to meet Europeans some time.

[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"You mean men are easier to exploit."

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago

This. IF these generalizations are actually true it still doesn't mean what he thinks it means. I also find the bit about "being strict" particularly gross. If it's valid workspace criticism, then there's no laws protecting women from it. So he clearly means something more like "I want to yell and insult and be a little dictator but women might report a hostile work environment."

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 week ago

So I heard a bunch of sexist shit (about men and women simultaneously which is very impressive) that aligns perfectly with my biases, but I wasn't aware it's ok to say out loud? Chat is this real?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's ragebait, a very specific form of engagement

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Not necessarily. You've never met someone with backwards, toxic views like this?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They can travel easily for work trips and meetings.

So can women in countries where personal transport is available and being raped isn’t as likely.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ex-fucking-zactly.

I don't think any of these really apply in countries which aren't predominantly muslim.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Discrimination on Lemmy?

You should go to Xitter maybe, where this kind of commentary is welcome.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Discrimination usually requires an act of selection as in "I'm not going to stay in a hotel operated by a muslim bigot".

I think you really mean prejudice which is an irrational attitude of hostility.

However, is it really irrational to suggest that societal expectations of women in predominantly muslim countries would make them less flexible employees?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The fact that the standard reasoning that leads to workplace discrimination against women caught him off guard says a lot. Ok his friend didn't call women too hysteric to work but still the other stuff should sound familiar too.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

GOOD point. They often have the vapors.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

It can be so much worse if they have Wandering Womb

In the middle of the flanks of women lies the womb, a female viscus, closely resembling an animal; for it is moved of itself hither and thither in the flanks, also upwards in a direct line to below the cartilage of the thorax, and also obliquely to the right or to the left, either to the liver or the spleen, and it likewise is subject to prolapsus downwards, and in a word, it is altogether erratic

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

"I do declare!"

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago

Sorry, but I'm not available 24/7. Far from it. In fact, leave me alone.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hashtag leadership! Hashtag equality!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

#workplacediversity was my favorite.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

To address his points:

  1. How are women any different in this situation?

  2. How are women any different in this situation?

  3. Why do you feel you can treat men harsher than women?

  4. How are women any different in this situation?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Would love to hear your thoughts!

Pretty sure you wouldn't love the avalanche of slurs mixed with the citations from socio-economic studies and the ethical arguments. It's quite ugly.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

My friend said something vaguely sexist, I asked him about it and he detailed his extreme sexism. I couldn't find faults in his sexism.

iS tHiS jUsT aN oLd WaY oF tHiNkInG?

[–] zipzoopaboop 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What exactly does engagement achieve on LinkedIn?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If someone says networking I'm gonna throw up. These are not the people I want in my network.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Pssst I'm on your WiFi👻

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I don't see how this post would be good for networking. This is the not the kind of person you want to work with.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

I use LinkedIn fire the sole purpose of promoting my research and the FOSS projects I work on, with the hope that if the right people see it, it can help what I do make a positive impact.

In that case, high engagement means more people see my stuff, which means a higher likelihood of the right people seeing it.

However, I'm sharing stuff that I actually hope is useful to someone out there. For people just circlejerking it's just for the ego boost.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Ugh, LinkedIn bros are the worst.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What would you have to say to him that he would find sexist?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"All men should die." Being said to him by a woman.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

"Men are not nice to women sometimes" would also do

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

I'm a man and none of that applies to me differently than it would my wife. In fact, she did contract work at crazy hours one year and we made it work.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, men can be pseudo-slaves legally. That's why employers love them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It works for the American prison industry!