this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
370 points (100.0% liked)

News

29215 readers
3302 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The White House Correspondents’ Association canceled comedian Amber Ruffin’s headlining appearance at its annual fundraising dinner.

The decision follows concerns over Ruffin’s anti-Trump comments and growing tensions with the Trump White House, which has restricted press access and pool assignments.

The association’s board voted unanimously for the change, seeking to avoid political division.

This shift mirrors its 2019 approach, when historian Ron Chernow spoke instead of a comedian amid similar Trump-era scrutiny.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 month ago

Once again demonstrating their collective cowardice...

Obeying in advance. Can't risk upsetting Don Mangolini. The Mafia Admin wins again.

🙄 🙄

[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seeking to avoid political division... through appeasement? Has that ever been effective? The press truly has abandoned their responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

‘Chamberlaining’ has never worked.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've heard persuasive arguments that Chamberlain did the only thing possible for Britain at the time. Their defense industry was just spinning up and they needed more time to have any chance at facing Germany. The Spitfire had only just started production, for example.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Germany's military industry was also trash at the time. Buying time for Britain's defence also bought time for Germany's offence.

If France, Britain, etc did something sooner rather than later a lot of bloodshed would have been avoided.

The World At War is an incredible documentary that covers it quite well.

https://youtu.be/4AA0lWwTXNc

"Since the French spurned any notion of taking the offensive, the Maginot Line ironically protected Germany better than it protected France." Narrator, 8:10

"A few French divisions advanced 5 miles. But they didn't even try to penetrate the Siegfried Line, at that time still unfinished. And while Poland fought on, there were no German tanks at all on the Western Front." Narrator, 12:40

"If ze French Army would have attacked in beginning of September wiz zere very strong superiority in division in armoured cars well act all armoured cars in ze Western Front at zat time. In artillery, in air force, we ze German forces in the so called Western Front could stand no more than 1 or 2 weeks." General Siegfried Westphal, Staff Officer Western Front, 14:05

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Avoid political division

I mean, the line between parties is now just Anti-fascists | Fascists (Centrists are here as well. Silence is complicity.)

We even got an operational Gestapo

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/29/us/rumeysa-ozturk-tufts-university-arrest-saturday/index.html

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Centrists are weak, feckless cowards who shift their position to accommodate each side. Pick a lane, assholes. We have a humanity to save.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

You're either with us or you're against us, right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's authoritarians (fascists, progressives) vs. Political moderates (liberals, centrists). Just because the authoritarians are in two camps doesn't make one good.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Man what? Your Democrat party is basically right wing for the rest of the west. Are you saying every other countries’ left leaning parties are authoritarian? Canada’s Liberal party would be more progressive than the Democratic Party and they’re not even our most progressive party…

What you’re saying is the most ignorant, America-brained political take I’ve seen recently

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm using hyperbole to mock the "centrists are fascists" mentality rampant in these parts of the Fediverse. The Republican party from the 1980s wasn't even fascist.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

For sure and I wouldn’t call 1980s centrists fascists but at this point the US Overton window has shifted so far to the right that it’s hard to forgive anyone still in the middle. Like you have one party that’s brought on a billionaire to dismantle the government, threatening annexation of a number of sovereign nations, detaining people (not even convicted of any crimes) in brutal, torturous ways, and a million other horrid things; and then you have the other party that just kind of wants to keep things the status-quo.

If the former party is fascism and the latter is (sane) liberal conservatism, what would you call someone in the centre of that? Looking in from outside the US, I don’t see much of a difference between proponents of the fascism and the centrists. Like if I hear someone “in the centre” say “hmm well maybe Trump is right, we should invade Canada/Greenland/Panama”, I’m going to rightfully call them a fascist.

Important note: I wouldn’t say this applies to other countries where the Overton window isn’t so insanely far to the right

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Anyone who can look at what's happening right now and say "BUT PROGRESSIVES ARE JUST AS BAD" is either a fascist or a useful idiot for the fascists.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

I’ll have what you’re smoking

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago (2 children)

...seeking to avoid political division.

Yes, because Trump's platform is unity.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

That’s them being diplomatic. The truth is that they’re intimidated. Their speech is being chilled.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

If you think of "unity" like the Nazis think about it, then yes.

BTW, that's how they have been describing it to others online for over a decade, too...if people they describe as "Communist" which means, in the Venn diagram, anyone who is !Nazi = "Communist", would just agree to stop fighting fascists, there will be unity. Also, "peace". Interestingly, it's how one of the magoffs that worked on/supports Project 2025 talked about their plans, too. Oh, and Putin talks the same way.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago

Instead just one comedian, you get house full of clowns

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wasn't it a correspondence dinner that is considered to be the day he decided to run for president because he was on the verge of tears being made fun of

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

Should just cancel the whole dinner. This is not normal times anyways.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Trump has no sense of humor. The only reason he ever smiles and laughs is when he knows he's getting something over on somebody.

It's not a shocker that he couldn't even handle the mildest of criticisms from a comedian.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I support that decision. What kind of jokes could a comedian make about all of this? About the resurgence of an autocratic state on the ruins of one of the first modern democracies?

Maybe a conservative, MAGA comedian could do it. But those don't exist. Ask yourself why.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They exist. They're just not recognized as comedians by those not in the cult because normal people don't see kicking down as humor.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That dude is less funny than Trump himself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, just giving you a MAGA conservative comedian. He has a massive and loyal fan base regardless of either of our opinions on him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If only George Carlin were still around. I bet he'd have a few words to say about all of this...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Spineless preemptively compliant cowards.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Seth Meyers' jokes at Trump's expense during the 2011 White House Correspondents dinner have been identified by those close to Trump as the moment he decided to seriously run for President.

Seth Meyers made this problem, it's up to him to fix it. Bonus points if he gets Trump to quit using only jokes.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Lmao "seeking to avoid political division". No you're avoiding dissonance. The GOP MO is to stoke political division, it's literally what gives them power.

Also "anti-trump" comments instead of just calling them concerns or critiques.

Language like this is how consent is manufacturered. Language is powerful at subtly shift how one percieves a situation, and leading people to a predetermined conclusion.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Remember when they had Stephen Colbert roast GW during the dinner? That was peak comedy. These guys are such losers they know Trump won't be able to handle being roasted, and somehow that's OK for a world leader.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember when they had Stephen Colbert roast GW during the dinner? That was peak comedy.

The best part is that they only invited Colbert because they didn't realize his character on The Colbert Report was a parody of right-wing pundits.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

The amount of people who didn't understand Colbert was performing satire was terrifying

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Little baby pee pee snowflakes

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Tiny 🍄 can’t handle criticism of any kind

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Absolute PUSSY.

Whoever downvoted, you’re wrong but at least you deprived me of literally nothing in the name of the biggest pussy on the planet. There is not a chance in hell that this was handed down by the board, this was handed down by a man who can’t take a fucking joke even when he is (MAYBE) the most powerful man on the planet, that is the definition of a giant PUSSY.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The news media is not supposed to be friendly with those in power, no matter who is in power. They're supposed to be a pain in the ass of the president (every president). They're supposed to be the Fourth Estate! They're supposed to be part of the checks and balances. It's always irked me that they do this correspondent's dinner and get all buddy buddy with the Whitehouse.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah, the whole thing is a just an embarrassing demonstration of how it's just a big social club rather than a relationship where they should be naturally antagonistic.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It's probably going to be cold hamberders again anyway.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

That's because nothing is funny anymore

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›