this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
252 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1096 readers
1595 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

Other communities of interest:

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 124 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Please China, slap back with an even higher number. See if you can out bluff the annoying orange. I feel like American consumers are way more reliant on Chinese stuff than China is relying on American goods.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago

local tyrant shoots self in foot, claims trade deficit with guns

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

Hahaha.. China needs US consumers far more than US needs Chinese consumers.

There's a 200 billion+ trade deficit from China...

Edit: 300 billion

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I highly doubt that, the rest of the world buys stuff from a China like crazy as well. They should be able to send the stuff elsewhere instead quite easily. What you're saying sounds just like something the orange idiot would say.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Gives pick me energy and it's the newest talking point and very annoying. Total exports as a percentage is 15% that china ships to the us.

A deficit doesn't make it a bad thing. It means we are more of a consumer economy to focus on higher level of jobs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, the deficit means China has the greater risk. China pushing a tariff on the little they consume from the US means nothing, just because they buy so little.

Basic economics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

China needs US consumers far more than US needs Chinese consumers

Isn't this the entire calculation that Republicans, and frankly, all free market types have gotten massively wrong?

That's not how trade deficits work, unless you've been drinking the koolaid for far too long.

Its not like the market for Chinese goods goes away because the US consumer has been priced out through self owns. So maybe China takes a bit of a hit? They can raise prices elsewhere to compensate or just take the L. But its no catastrophic game breaking L because literally the entire world buys Chinese goods.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

Please go around your house and count what percentage of the things you own say "made in china" on them.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

this isn't about needing consumers. it's about needing imported goods. how much does the US need things imported from China and how much does China need imports from the US?

also what ... how does the US not need Chinese consumers, it's a ginormous market, have you been sleeping for the last couple of decades where every big American company has been specifically marketing to China?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

$361 billion as of 2024. But that doesn't mean they need the US. They're still doing a lot of trade with the rest of the world. And this won't be stopping trade entirely, the US will still be importing a lot from China.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

This is literally what their belt and road initative is built to hedge against.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

They do right now, as their manufacturing is built around shipping 300 billion more to the US than they buy from the US.

If the US suddenly reduces that buying by even 20%, it's not like they can suddenly sell that elsewhere. "Elsewhere" is already buying what they want. You can't magically make new consumers appear.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's also $36 trillion in offshore tax havens, but I don't see anybody complaining about that so wtf should we care about 200 billion? How much has USA given to Israel?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I think over the term of the "friendship" over 300 billion dollars

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

False.

U.S. goods exports to China in 2024 were $143.5 billion, down 2.9 percent ($4.2 billion) from 2023. U.S. goods imports from China in 2024 totaled $438.9 billion, up 2.8 percent ($12.1 billion) from 2023.

https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/china-mongolia-taiwan/peoples-republic-china

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From your source, the last sentence is

The U.S. goods trade deficit with China was $295.4 billion in 2024, a 5.8 percent increase ($16.3 billion) over 2023.

Doesn't that confirm their assertion of a $200B+ trade deficit or am I confused? I'm not particularly economics savvy.

Edit: derp, I reversed the meaning of their comment, they thought the US has the deficit. They got it backwards!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What you just posted indicates there is actually a $300 billion deficit with China, which makes their point even more pronounced. China has much more to lose in terms of wealth from trade with the US.

Trump is still a dumbass and we're all the losers in this fiasco though. There are legitimate benefits to trade and sometimes things shouldn't be even.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are far more consumers than producers.

So another way to say it is: US consumers are highly reliant on Chinese producers with few other options. Chinese producers are somewhat reliant on US consumers, but there are options all around the globe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Really? Let's see China suddenly ship the next 6 months of produced stuff somewhere else and sell it (because they've been making it to allow for shipping time). They're producing 2025 Xmas stuff now.

Who's got 500 billion of extra purchasing power right now? (The 200 billion deficit plus current US purchasing)?

Remember, China has hundreds of massive container ships just waiting to dock. Are they going to spend millions on fuel to now send those ships elsewhere?

Ya all crack me up that you actually believe China has any leverage in this conflict. We haven't even touched on Xi having no ability to back down.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Dear world,

Just fucking embargo us already. Make the GOP remove the fucker from office.

Sincerely,

A desperate American

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago

You're well on your way to effectively embargoing yourselves by the looks of it

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

~~Make the~~ Americans remove every GOP ~~remove~~ ~~the fucker from office~~ head.

ftfy.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We really should be handling our own shit here.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I would but my military doesn't have nukes

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Make the GOP remove the fucker from office.

And replace him with... a more competent fascist? Tariffs are, if anything, lowering the difficulty of getting the fascists out of office by causing real harm to the average person before the Trump regime has consolidated enough power to stop a mass movement. Tariffs are the silver lining in the shit sandwich that is project 2025, and rather than just Trump all the GOP and most of the DNC should be banished from politics effective immediately.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You have a second amendment precisely for circumstances like this. Clean up your own yard.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Sic Semper some damned Tyrannis already.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is our mess, probably need to start fucking up magats

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What we have right now is the best opportunity to end this administration peacefully by causing a GOP revolt against him. But to do that, we need the world to help make this as painful as possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In some ways that’s what Trump wants. If people can’t buy (afford) the item then they will make it in the US. Once tariffs and markup make it profitable to manufacture in the US then someone will make it there.

However if the raw material or components aren’t available or there is a limited supply (export quota from china) then it will never be adorable to manufacture them in the US. China has already cut some exports to the US along these lines.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Well, the problem here is time. Trump (and the electoral cycle tbh) is so goddamn volatile and supply chains take so long to organize, that a change really is as good as a rest in this case. By the time they manage to re-organize supply chains and get new domestic supply off the ground, it'll be three or four years from now probably, and at the rate things are changing, who fucking knows what things will look like by then. It's just as possible that all this tariff stuff ends tomorrow as it is to persist, so it's safer all around to wait and see.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago

I'm announcing 104% tariffs on wal-mart due to their frankly insane trade deficit with my family: they refuse to buy ANYTHING from us, and you think we're just supposed to take that lying down???

(/s you gotta laugh to keep from crying)

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The S&P is trying to ride up on any good news but Trump just keeps on waterboarding the economy, hahahaha...

(RIP my TFSA investment account, but it is plain hilarious at this point)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I want to know what the discussion was like...

"105 percent are you crazy? That's too high!"

"But 103 won't send enough of a message!"

"Better order up some coffee, this could take all night."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Apparently it was an arbitrary extra 50% on top of the recent 54%, which was the supposed trade deficit plus existing tariffs. I'm not saying it's not batshit, but the new figure wasn't a totally random specific number.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

You know this is a genius move because they really did the math. 103% just wouldn't do it and 105% is just too far even for them.

Big brains for sure. Lol

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

An attack on China is an attack on US allies that supply China with resources. Australia hasn't fully woken up to this bastard act with our little 10% tariff and history of acting like a 51st state but we might be as fucked as Canada before sanity returns to the US.

China can't beat the US in this battle but all they have to do is endure the pain and wait for the US to lose interest. So ultimately China wins. But we all lose through this stupidity (probably shouldn't really call it stupidity as it diminishes any bad intentions at work here. There are people in this admin who should understand the consequences). Fuck Trump and his administration and the Republican party and their voters and the apathetic fuckwits who didn't vote. No single person is responsible for this and no single person can fix it. People need to man the fuck up and fix the shit they have unleashed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I imagine China can not only win this but come out with the worlds reserve currency.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I disagree on that. The Euro is the second most widely held currency and is a more obvious choice. Working constructively with China is economic reality. Submitting to them is unnecessary. This isn't post-WW2. I don't think we need a single reserve currency.

There is no doubt China is going to benefit greatly. A huge number of developing countries have been deserted by the US that first walked away from soft power through US Aid then penalised the poorest countries with outrageous tariffs. China has been by far the smarter player.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

The one thing that benefits from that is nature. Maybe this will at least put a damper on overconsumption. Otherwise it's a shit situation for everyone around.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But really, what does China make that the US wants? Solar panels, batteries, electronics, boards games, rare earth elements, industrial manufacturing equipment, drones, and ships?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

It has this energy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now cars too but I don't think we can get them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a European, I must make a list of everything I should buy from AliExpress when the prices will drop.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It'll be the usual for me: magnets of various sizes and shapes, box of assorted screws, several ESP32-based boards, and one funky gadget to tie that off nicely.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Every time i order magnets, they get lost. Probably because they end up on the wall of some container of truck or van

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I’m glad I moved out. Now I’m in a country where Chinese made stuff are plentiful, of good quality and cheaper than they ever were in the US. I get to keep more of my paycheck.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Magats are rationalizing this shit already and saying it’s fine so don’t hold any hope in them ever coming back to reality

load more comments
view more: next ›