1008
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago

I think shitting on Americans for every little thing they handle differently is moronic but I will say I won't ever order food that's advertised as "footlong". That's just needlessly gross. I don't like to imagine the cashier lining up a sandwich with their bare sole for quality control but that's the kinda mental image the term conjures up.

[-] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Wait to you find out how they measure the 6 inch ones.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

Well that explains the shrinkflation

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

When you're in the pool, there's shrinkage!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Do women know about shrinkage?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

It's Footlong® not foot-long. Not to be confused with an actual measurement or size guarantee.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Footlong sandwiches have nothing to do with the body part "foot".

They hardly have anything to do with the measurement "foot" since they are like 10.5 inches (~26cm) now or something (as opposed to the 30ish centimeters that make a foot).

This is part of the enshittificaton of Subway.

Their cookies are still dope tho.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I'm like 60% sure during the height of subway in mid-2000s-early 2010s the subway commercials actually did advertise the foot long as being 12 inch sub's for 5$ (goddamn the 5$ foot long ads were catchy). However unlike real measurements that have defined standards, as subway enshitified they weren't forced to change naming as they slowly shrank the sandwiches. Of course this is long enough ago that an entire generation doesnt know who Jared was so its okay to assume it was never a real foot long.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

How about a sandwich shop where you can order a Big Italian?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Well if it's a sandwich shop you'd really need two Italians, even big ones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago

Nothing more European than a metrosexual

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

many people wonder that, why are feet so desired? sure, there are people that are into every crevice of the body, but feet seem to be winning the popularity race by a lot? hell, even otherwise vanilla people like them sometimes

the answer issss... (probably) that our spaghetti wiring of the nerves is to blame. you see the nerves responsible for feet connect to the spinal cord riiiight next to where our genitals connect as well. so sometimes the more intense signals tickle the unintended paths next to their intended one. some people when they orgasm (myself included) can feel a wave of electricity running down into their feet, even making one or multiple of their toes curl.

picture of a diagram of the spinal cord, the relevant nerves being Lumbar nerves (Lx) and Sacral nerves (Sx)

Lumbar spine L1 – the first lumbar nerve is responsible for sensations around the groin and genitals, and has a role in motor control of the hips. L2, L3, L4 convey sensation for the front and inside of the thighs, and extend to the inner aspect of the lower legs. L5 nerve region covers the outside of the thighs extending into the outer aspect of the top of the lower legs.

Sacral Spine S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 nerves provide some nerve supply to the genitals, as well as the anus, sacrum, buttocks and the backs of the thighs. The pudendal nerve is the nerve bundle comprising nerves from S2-S4 and which is the primary nerve of the perineal area.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

That explains it from a having your feet played with side, but not really from the finding feet hot side.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

One causes the other

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Making other people feel good feels good.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

it's also just a reaction to sexually transmitted epidemics, interestingly enough.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9819924/

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

right!! I came across this article at some point a year or two back, and it's kinda lived rent free in my head since then lmao

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

it kinda sounds like- our genetrics tell us "right so let's dial back on normal fucking but uhhh ah! yes fuck some feet idk"

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think the more important overlap is in the brain itself. We have known that regions of cortex that register genital stimulation are adjacent to/overlap with the area hat registers foot stimulation since Penfield did the first mapping of cortex in the 1930s.

In answer to "that's true for perception, but why the excitement for looking" lays in that the homuncular representation is not a simple one. We know that there are multiple homuncululi tied to different types of perception, and there is more modern work that ties the planning and goal systems to the functional centres around key points of the homonculi. The physical closeness of the two is possibly responsible for the mingling of the two representations. Back in the day there was even a mechanism for it - "ephaptic excitation" - where axons running in a bundle could activate neighbouring fibres through changing the ionic composition of the fluid around them.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

sounds like it's a double whammy then! really no wonder feet are so popular

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

As someone who isn't into feet, I've always just assumed it's because uncovered feet are vaugely intimate. As in feet are mostly covered by shoes but when you get to see them uncovered it might just mean the situation has gotten intimate. I mean that's basically the idea behind any societal view which dictates that women should cover any particular part of their body, it's not that muslim people inherently find hair sexy, it's the societal norms which attached an intimate meaning to hair.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I have to agree with this one. I acknowledge that feet are indeed connected to genitalia via nerves, but I highly, highly doubt that's the reason that viewing a woman's bare feet makes some men horny. I don't think the foot fetish is about her and/or her nerves or pleasure at all. It's a simple matter of getting to see an often delicate looking body part that is usually concealed, and being allowed to interact with them in a sexual way. I'm more of a butt/thighs/hips guy, myself.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

I agree with you both; it's the most logical explanation. See also: cultures that don't revere womens' breasts (likely) since they're never covered.

Also

I'm more of a butt/thighs/hips guy, myself.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

There are so many unique things that arouse people. You know that rule that there's a fetish for everything. I strongly suspect it's a human wiring issue, some related evolutionary advantage that manifests as having things for feet, or hair colors, or freckles or untold less socially acceptable things.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

viewing a woman’s bare feet makes some men horny

how heteronormative and male centric. what about women who like male feet? what about queer people who like feet?

It’s a simple matter of getting to see an often delicate looking body part that is usually concealed, and being allowed to interact with them in a sexual way

That's really not how it works. Sure, there may be some of that, but it's not a "simple matter" as you described at all. There's much, much more to it than that.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That was your takeaway? That I wasn't inclusive in who potentially finds the feet arousing? Plug in whatever you would like. I'm not making fucking rules here.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Not so much that you weren't inclusive. More that society at large isn't. You didn't deserve the ire I directed at you but the ire is still there.

So much default assumption that anything foot fetish related has to be only men being into only women's feet. It drives me crazy. Not your fault and I apologize for the snark.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

No harm done. I really appreciate the pleasant response.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

I've always just assumed it's because uncovered feet are vaugely intimate

Especially when they're in my mouth

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

don't forget the shame. the wrongness of it is very much part of it. like, most people think feet are kind of gross, so it feels taboo to like them. taboo is one of the strongest things in fetishes. "this is so wrong/dirty" is a powerful thought for the horny mind.

honestly, if/when society becomes more accepting of foot fetishes i bet that will actually decrease the number of people that have one. if society stops shaming them it likely won't get them off the same way.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Ehat about people who like feet naturally? I'd much prefer it wasnt strange to think feet are attractive.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I've yet to meet a woman who wasn't into a good foot-rub. It's my go-to opening move for the Netflix-and-Chill date and rarely fails to end in us at least making out. I never really got "foot-fetish" as a guy thing. It struck me more as a girl thing, with women using "rub my feet" as an excuse to initiate intimacy. And some guys just decided if a woman was showing any amount of feet, she must be coming on to him.

I mean that’s basically the idea behind any societal view which dictates that women should cover any particular part of their body, it’s not that muslim people inherently find hair sexy, it’s the societal norms which attached an intimate meaning to hair.

I think the issue isn't the presentation of hair, but of femininity. And the more extreme interpretations of this (hardly unique to Islam - Puritanical Christians, orthodox Jews, and other more fanatical patriarchal faiths also demand women hide themselves) are about disguising any aspect of a person that might lead to a man being aroused. Eventually, you're just shoving women into an entirely separate room, because the presumption is that men have zero self-control in any social setting.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

so when you go to the beach or pool with friends it's intimate?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

yes lol. have you seen a bikini? that's explicitly intimate and provocative. it's the most naked you're allowed to be in public without people calling you out.

beaches are often considered inherently sexual places. like "Beach episode" is synonymous with fan service.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Like the beach scene in saving private Ryan

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

i mean... we saw parts of them that we don't normally. there's even a taboo around seeing those parts. taboo is the heart of many fetishes.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Or Top Gun.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Heck, the US can't even standardize on meters. We have volt meters, amp meters, flow meters, sound meters...

[I'll show myself out]

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

I appreciate them for making walking easier

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I appreciate them for making kicking nazis easier

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

miss the old days

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

What's with the black lines, making it look like Thern, iPhcne?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Metres measure absolute distance, but feet measure how distance feels. One foot is a short distance, and a hundred foot is s long distance.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
1008 points (100.0% liked)

memes

16380 readers
3716 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS