this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
655 points (100.0% liked)

memes

15547 readers
4871 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago (3 children)

My time abroad has taught me that YYYY/MM/DD is the way to format dates.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

My time using a computer and trying to have any semblance of organization has taught me the same

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

my man!

its really the only option if you're using it for things like file storage.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 days ago (2 children)

YYYY-MM-DD if you're doing backup naming, easier to find

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yup, versioned files ALWAYS get a YYYY-MM-DD HHMM timestamp. So when you sort alphabetically, they sort chronologically.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago

iso8601 aka 2025-06-12

[–] [email protected] 304 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (26 children)

Waiting for the ISO 8601 & 9001 gang to show up and promote YYYY-MM-DD.

Edit: That took seconds, a very punctual bunch.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 3 days ago (7 children)

YYYYMMDD, scrub out the excess fat!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 days ago

That's ... why I'm here

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 days ago (13 children)

RFC 3339 if you please. Let's be prescriptive.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I’m now imagining a child who must write 2026-05-10T10:06:09.426792Z on all of their tests.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They should also add a timezone since most of us don't live at UTC zero timezones -> 2012-12-28T18:12:33+09:00

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They did; the Z at the end denotes UTC.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

ISO thirsty!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Btw this is how it’s used in some countries (eg., Hungary, Japan, China, and a few others from Asia). All other date formats are very strange and confusing for us

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago (3 children)

For consistency, Americans should adopt mm:ss.hh MM-DD-YYYY.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For consistency, Europeans should adopt ss:mm:hh DD-MM-YYYY.

See how ridiculous that is? ISO8601 or GTFO

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The european one is sorted based on importance to see. The day is more important than the month which is more important than the year. The hour is more important than the minute which is more important than the second

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

But in any given situation where the month is important enough that I need to know it, I want to know the month regardless of the day. The 25th means fuck all to me unless I know the month, as well; whereas there are plenty of scenarios where I want to know the month but the day isn't quite as important.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Usually if someone just says the 25th that means of the current month. The month only needs to be referred to if it's not the same as the current. (In conversation)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

At least ss:mm:hh and DD-MM-YYYY are internally consistent, even if they aren't consistent with each other.

MM-DD-YYYY isn't even internally consistent.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

You monster

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Nah they should adopt metric time and nothing else.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 3 days ago

ISO 8601 gang.

Represent.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is stupid AF.

YYYY/MM/DD

This is the best choice.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

/ isn't a valid char in filenames, yyyy-mm-dd is better

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 3 days ago (7 children)

This fucknuts who thinks day should come before year, hah! Give me YYYY-MM-DD, because dashes are better than slashes any day of the week.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This format is the best. Especially for digital file names, because sorting the files by filename also sorts them by date.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Immediate red flag, we all know that YYYY/MM/DD is the only acceptable perfect date

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Actually YYYY-MM-DD is better since it can be used basically everywhere and with / it can't be used in filenames

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago (2 children)

YYYYMMDDHHMMSS is the only acceptable format.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ISO 8601 is clearly much superior due to being delimited.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago (4 children)

If you use DD/MM/YYYY then logically you should also use ss:mm:hh

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sarcastically Shaking My Many Hydra Heads.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Heretic!

YYYY.MM.DD is the correct format.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

small correction: YYYY-MM-DD to avoid common special meanings chars

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

rfc3339 my beloved

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago (12 children)

Don't go with this psycho! He mixes European style order with US style punctuation.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (10 children)

For computing or sorting purposes, YYYY-MM-DD is best. But in day to day writing a date, I prefer DD-MON-YYYY.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›