Ye Power Trippin' Bastards
This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.
Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.
Posting Guidelines
All posts should follow this basic structure:
- Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
- What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
- Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
- Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
- Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.
Rules
- Post only about bans or other sanctions that you have received from a mod or admin.
- Don’t use private communications to prove your point. We can’t verify them and they can be faked easily.
- Don’t deobfuscate mod names from the modlog with admin powers.
- Don’t harass mods or brigade comms. Don’t word your posts in a way that would trigger such harassment and brigades.
- Do not downvote posts if you think they deserved it. Use the comment votes (see below) for that.
- You can post about power trippin’ in any social media, not just lemmy. Feel free to post about reddit or a forum etc.
- If you are the accused PTB, while you are welcome to respond, please do so within the relevant post.
Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.
Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.
YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.
Some acronyms you might see.
- PTB - Power-Tripping Bastard: The commenter agrees with you this was a PTB mod.
- YDI - You Deserved It: The commenter thinks you deserved that mod action.
- YDM new - You Deserved More: The commenter thinks you got off too lightly.
- BPR - Bait-Provoked Reaction: That mod probably overreacted in charged situation, or due to being baited.
- CLM - Clueless Mod: The mod probably just doesn't understand how their software works.
Relevant comms
I fucking love this picture
Congratulations! You just had a run in with DJM/Universalmonk/BarryGoldwater/ I lost track of the rest of his alts.
I suppose I should count myself lucky that I haven't heard of/experienced this dude before, what's their deal?
UM used to post a ton of conservative bullshit, then would get offended when it was downvoted into oblivion, then would go off on unrelated rants and would message people heinous bullshit. We're talking posting and commenting like it was a full time job. That account got banned, and he created a bunch of alts on other instances to get around it. It was always suspected that DJM was an UM alt, and then was confirmed when he posted one of UM's rants word for word. Once you know what to look for it's pretty obvious. Most of the accounts I know of were created on the same day, have the same style of weird AI created avatar (pretty sure they're made using the Dream app by Womble), and all have some sort of vaguely libertarian sounding quote in their profile.
I think there's a few posts about UM on fediverse lore as well.
That explains why they accused OP of having alts, every accusation and all that.
Lemmy.world has been pretty good about blocking the alts as they come up because they like derailing threads, baiting users into breaking rules, arguing pointless semantics, rule lawyering and/or making everything about themselves.
What’s the evidence these are the same people?
What’s the evidence these are the same people?
Notice how this is never answered. There is no evidence, because it's not true. Why interrupt a good Universal Monk hatefest with logic? lol
They never give proof, not even IP addresses. They claim similar writing styles but they aren't similar at all, beyond using the same language.
Edit: Downvoting another user wanting proof isn't proof.
Not me. Not my community. Not my issue. I don't have alt names. I'm on a couple other instances but under this name. I'm not involved or even mentioned in OP, so not sure why you're bringing me into it.
Wait wtf. I… either you’re a different universal monk….. oooorrrr…. You’ve purged/created a new account.
Well yeah, but looking through their history at zero they… had a change of heart? Math and piracy, not politics and qanon.
Welp, I just got home from work, and I had a rough day, so I can't stop myself from replying. I'll do just this one and log off the fediverse for the night.
If you look at the profile of the user you're replying to, at the top you'll see they made themselves a banner showing off how other people despise them. This could be a good thing if the people they were bragging about were like... nazis. But this individual has a reputation and they really, really earned it.
If you search 'Universal Monk' on the fediverse, you'll get this at the top, "I'm Calling For the Fediverse to Ban Universal Monk." It does a deep dive of their other accounts. A lot of what they're doing in this thread is claiming that they're super open and honest about who they are (and they're on an account they've curated to not be such a douche canoe) which means you have to look at the other accounts to see what the deal is.
Here's a link to a call to action on slrpnk calling to ban UM. The post isn't interesting- the comments are. And after seeing how people make a game out of figuring out the rules of a place specifically so they can be as obnoxious as possible without copping a ban, seeing this behavior in the wild and recognizing it for what it is, sets my teeth on edge. (This is where I would move to the section to talk about evidence of puppetry and such, but I'm choosing not to hyperfocus on this.)
ETA: Okay I couldn't help myself. I added a bit in a paragraph above, but here is a fantastic bit. This is a comment from auk. It's under the second link. I'm copy and pasting the relevant bit here. (Auk is speaking to UM.)
You did know you were being obnoxious previously, and refused to stop doing it until it escalated to an account ban, and then made some new accounts and started looking for new places to do it.
I think admins and mods those new places can make the decision about whether that is ban evasion, or whether they want to let you do this all again until you inevitably get banned again sometime later. People have talked with you about why what you’re doing is a problem. Why they would pick that second option is something of a mystery to me, but I’ll leave it up to them. I’m just relaying the information.
It would be a different story if you were just misunderstanding something, and completely open to a conversation about why you keep getting banned and what you can do differently, but you’re clearly more interested in figuring out the details of the rules so you can find ways around them and keep doing your same thing.
No change of heart. All my posts are public here and on .world too. Take a look. You'll see that I was always third-party. In fact, that's how the hate started. I was posting articles about the Green Party candidate to the .world politics comm. Then switched my vote over to Socialist Party.
Back in the day, that was considered treason because I wasn't voting for Biden or Harris. Now Lemmy is cool w third party. Back then, they def were not cool. I was called a russian troll, said I'd disappear after the election, etc. One poster in particular who's posting in this very thread, used to say I was a russian traitor for supporting third party.
All my posts and comments are public. People are just holding grudges because I didn't vote for the duopoly. I was proud of it then. Proud of it now. Off-topic though. I'm not the person OP was talking about and OP isn't banned from any of my communities anyway.
Oh banned from way more places than just .world! I stand by every post though. I proudly stood against the duopoly before standing against the duopoly was cool. I haven't changed my mind: Third-party forever. Union forever. No regrets!
But off-topic. Let's not turn this into a UM fest. I had nothing to do with OP or his banning. He's not even banned in my communities.
ok, don't care, not my country. you're singularly responsible for turning this thread into a you-fest. you just need to not reply.
you’re singularly responsible for turning this thread into a you-fest
I didn't bring my name up tho! I only started responding to people who started saying my name--you included. I didn't start any of this drama. I'm not even in main OP's post! He's not banned from any of my stuff and I've never even heard of him
you just need to not reply.
So I shouldn't reply to a bunch of people making up false shit about me and my motivations?! Nah, I'll stand up for myself. Thanks for the advice, anyway.
But yes, I'm happy to move on if people stop bringing up my name when I have nothing to do with OP, OP's situation, and OP is not banned in any of my communities anyway.
I know. Everytime I see they made a dbzer0 alt I cringe but nothing I can do.
Tbh, I don't give much credence to the reports about Universal Monk. It's not hard to imagine a couple of trolls spinning up fake "alt" accounts to impersonate him and to get him instance banned over his vote third party stance. You know how unhinged the Democrats get when someone tries to vote with their values.
Anyway, whatever they have been accused of doing in the past, their account on dbzer0 has been pretty wholesome overall. We decided to give him a second chance here. Let bygones be bygones and all that. And so far at least, no problems. Make of that what you will.
Gotta love how people make shit up about users they dislike.
It's disturbing just how effective this campaign has been. I think part of the reason is that many admins just tend to go along with the consensus when these things are occurring, because it's easier to take someone's word for whats going on than actually look at all the details, especially when it's been playing out over years now. We've all been guilty of this.
But the fact is:
- trolls exist
- trolls can use a vpn
- trolls can create an impersonation account and act like an insane arsehole
- trolls can report that account as being an alt of universal monk
Multiply that a dozen times and you have a successful mud slinging campaign to get someone multi-instance banned.
I think your image needs a few more pixels, I can't read any of that's it's all pixelated
OP, could you provide a Ctrl+C Ctrl+V of the conversation? It's practically impossible to read it from the picture.
Anyway. I don't think the voting system is the right way to handle this shit; if the mod is a troll (as other comments here say), it's probably better to gather people affected by the troll, then contact the admins of the instance of the community in question. A few things might happen:
- Admins don't intervene. Avoid instance, throw shit on the fan, call for defederation, yadda yadda.
- Admins intervene. Problem solved.
Either way don't interact with the comm. Not even downvoting. You're basically giving it activity.
Good advice, as usual
image of tiny unreadable text:
break accessibility for no reason.
Is this a web post for ants?
This is precisely why the fediverse needs private voting, and is the number 1 reason to support Piefed.
deleted by creator
I like public voting. Yes, it can be abused by powertripping mods, but it also makes detecting bots and brigading much easier. That's going to be increasingly important as the fediverse grows.
Just checked my inbox... At what point does it become harassment?
EDIT: Well it was a shitty 6 days while it lasted.
I'm pretty sure that user trolls on a bunch of different accounts.
Ignore them the fediverse is much better without them.
Definitely PTB.
I want to say CLM... If a community really doesn't want downvotes, why not setup the community on an instance that doesn't do downvoting?
If downvoting is "manipulation" just because you don't like it... why allow downvotes at all? Lemmy supports disabling downvotes. It's a checkbox for the admin. It's easy.
What do the pixels say?
Donald J Musk. One of the biggest trolls on Lemmy.
Looks like you DMed them, and now you're getting pissy that they went off on you? Don't be a douche and go bitching in PMs then.
BPR, and judging from the young age of your account, you're an alt of someone else trying to start shit. There's no way somebody brand new to Lemmy would know to start a post here after a single week.
Yeah, I thought about a Lemm.ee alt due to the shutdown, but no other account exists with that name.
taps temple Can't get harassed in DMs if you constantly forget that they exist.
Turns out I'm still signed in and Lemmy's image compression is shit. The week on Lemmy was enlightening and after I post this I will delete my account. Anyway, here's a re-typed transcript because he edited out some of the weirder bits about milfs but I kept screenshots:
Me: Wait, wait, wait, you can’t be serious! You ban people for downvoting AND every single thing in your community is downvoted? Shit, life must be tough
DMJ: I don't ban people for downvoting. I ban people for serial downvoting without interacting with the community.
Here's the deal: That whole thing that ya think is fun, like downvoting every article in a community you don't like is now starting to be seen as not cool. Lemmy has updated mod tools.
I'm not the only one on Lemmy who thinks this way. More and more mods and admins are getting tired of people trying to control narratives by just going around and downvoting a bunch of stuff at once.
Lemmy admin has updated mod tools just because of people like you. It's actively talked about now. Look up "serial downvoting" and you'll see that Lemmy admin has seen a pattern in what you all do and they are putting a stop to it.
Brah, you didn't read the article, think to yourself, "hmmm, interesting, but some incorrect info. I should downvote because that's not right."
No, you didn't do that. You went, "Fuck this MAGA asshole! Right-wing assholes have no right to be on Lemmy!" And just started downvoting every article. Without reading them. Without giving any thoughts.
You thought that maybe, just maybe, if you and enough people downvoted everything, maybe I would stop posting!
Guess what? Not happening. In fact, the more people downvote me, the more shit I post.
You are perfectly free to downvote anything you want. And I am perfectly free to ban you. See how that works?
And you just inspired me to post a bunch more stuff today. And that whole thing about maybe you should just come up with alts and downvote.
Cool, still won't stop me. I'm never ever ever going to leave Lemmy. I'm never ever ever going to stop posting articles that I want to post.
Also, my life isn't tough at all. In fact, I took early retirement, and I can do what I want whenever I want, all day every day. Forever. I get to fuck around on Lemmy. Or go to the pool. Or fuck milfs. Doesn't matter. Through hard work, I became financially independent and won't ever work a day in my life for the rest of my life. I'm also healthy and fit as fuck, so man, I am gonna live a really really long time. Ooops.
Feel free to just block and ignore me. Or hey, come up with alts and waste your time downvoting my posts. I'm not going anywhere.
Ever. :)
Me: Ha ha ha your skin is PAPER thin, man. This is neurotic.
Me: [picture of Voyager's search screen showing "serial downvoting" having 0 search results]
Me: What an asshole
DMJ: Brah, I didn’t invent, nor push for, the tools to ban serial downvoters. Lemmy admin noticed it and has been talking about it with mods. So is there skin “PAPER thin,” too?
You’re the one all butthurt about not being able to downvote shit in a community you don’t even like.
You know, you could just move on and stay away from communites that you hate. You realize that there is more to life than bitching about politics on Lemmy, right?
And you didn't and won't bully me off of Lemmy by downvoting. I’m posting more stuff right now, so get your alts ready.
And be sure to click that downvote button really hard! Make sure you can hear that mouse click!
OR you can be the change you wanna see, and create your own community and mod it however you want. And when you get serial downvoters, just let them run free. Nothing stopping you from doing that.
DMJ: Awww, I see you are really mad that I stopped you from downvoting in a community that you hate.
Damn. Hmmm, what can we do about this, I mean, you had such fun trying to control the narrative and bully. And now you can't. Crap! What can you do.
Well, you can create a bunch of alts, and then go around and try downvoting all over again.
Yeah, do that! I would very much love knowing that you are so pathetic and so pissed off over it that you spend your time creating alts just to downvote posts on Lemmy!
hahahahaha, please please please do that! You wasting your time doing that instead of making real change would be the most hilarious thing ever.
I think we could be friends if you do that. I know you don't have a lot of friends. I can be your friend.
Wanna be friends now? Want me to hold your hand as you push that downvote button really hard? Would that make you feel better?
More messages not in the original image
DMJ: you try to portray yourself as someone that you’re not. You act like you’re not petty, you are. Funny how you posted “Lemmy.today and hilariouschaos.com for the same reason” when someone asked what communities or instances do you have blocked to make your Lemmy experience more enjoyable.
You said that you blocked those, but you haven’t. Not only haven’t you blocked them, you actively seek them out to downvote in them. When you get banned and you’re not allowed to downvote in there, you throw a fit. i bet you have a nice long list of alts so you can downvote, don’t ya? And that list is gonna grow today, isn’t it?
Me: Who do you think I am? After a handful of downvotes, you seem to think is your world ending and you ban me. You’re making a huge deal out of this. I’m not even talking about the ban. Whatever. I’m not allowed in your shitty communities anymore. From the looks of the modlog, half of lemmy is banned from the public diaries you call comms. Yeah, I think people should ban those instances, but… DING DING DING, we have a winner! Somebody realized I didn’t block them! Have a cookie. Get it yourself.
I’m glad you love whoever this person you think I am, but leave me alone. I don’t have a list of alts if you don’t count my soon to die lemm.ee account. I only downvoted you a handful of times because you are not worth my time. I’m apparently worth your time though. Paragraph after paragraph of what should probably be a therapy session are now in my inbox and I have no clue what the fuck you’re talking about half the time.
Post, don’t post, I. Do. Not. Give. A. Shit. You’re too scared/banned to post anywhere I care to spend my time, anyway. It’s more than obvious that I don’t need to do a thing for your posts to get the downvotes they deserve. Better go hurry and ban them too! If you want to be King of Lemmy then you better keep banning. Talk about controlling the fucking narrative…
DMJ: you should be happy I banned you, because now you don’t have to deal with me anymore. See? Win-win for you, guy!bYou are worth my time. I think everyone is worthy of being loved. I’m here for you.
Paragraph after paragraph of what should probably be a therapy session are now in my inbox and I have no clue what the fuck you’re talking about half the time.
Oh you can delete those, it’s easy. That way you won’t have to be so troubled by them. I can see that it’s weighing heavily on you. i feel so badd that I send you replies that take 30 seconds to read. How could I?! The horror!!!
It’s more than obvious that I don’t need to do a thing for your posts to get the downvotes they deserve.
You don’t have to do the work then. Others are. you ca be happy now!
If you want to be King of Lemmy then you better keep banning
“Better to be a King in Hell, than a Follower in Heaven.”
Thank you for your life-changing advice. Now we can be friends? Kiss and make up? Come on, let’s be friends. It’ll beeee fun!!
So friends?
Me: I’ve made my last post on Lemmy. Thanks for showing me how open minded and not-like-reddit it is. You sir can have a fantastic day. I will no longer be signing in.
DMJ: I don’t think you should stop posting on reddit. I did just see your post about me in the power tripping bastards community and l posted you a relevant post from that community as well. I feel that you misrepresented it, and make it sound like I am stalking you via DM, I’m replying to your DM’s and you DM’d me first. I have a shot of our entire conversation Don’t leave Lemmy just because you had a disagreement with me. Block me and move on with your day and continue with Lemmy. nothing we have talked about worth quitting over.
I mean, BPR, since you even admit you were blanket voting without any other criteria, then went back.
That's separate from the mod in specific power tripping though. Yeah, you got the reaction you wanted, but that particular mod is already well known to be batshit.
Look folks, there's always going to be edge cases where one of us is going to down vote persistent types of posts. I've done it, I've seen people that I know are reasonable, decent folks do it. But at some point, vote blitzing ceases to be a useful form of action and turns into just wagging dick to feel good about ourselves.
So, yeah, now that mods can see blitzes easily, we can all expect to see more bans for it. And, inevitably, there's going to be cases where it looks like a blitz, but wasn't intentional. So we can look forward to posts here because of those errors.
What's the answer though? You can't tell at a glance what a user's intent is, or if they're paying enough attention to realize they're even voting on things in the same community. But, that kind of vote manipulation is also a fucking problem. Mods need some ability to keep their communities rolling along as intended. Lemmy, and even piefed, are pretty damn sparse with mod tools. Limited options to shape how a community is guided and help keep a vibe beyond just banning people.
Having something other than gut instinct to use as a metric for keeping out bad actors is necessary. And the truth is that most people down voting multiple posts in a row aren't there to participate in the community at all. They're just reacting emotionally to titles and thumbnails.
Which is fine! Nothing wrong with that, and it's the best argument for down voting being an option because it's great at filtering out people that just want to gripe about the surface of things. A down vote makes it so that less of them come in and grump at other people.
But it does mean that mods are going to have to judge you based on that alone. Nobody has time to chase you down and ask your motivation.
And, OP, just in case, it doesn't matter what the community was, what the topic of the posts were. I'm not arguing over that side of things; I'd likely have down voted a few before having to decide if a report about the community to admins would do any good, or if I should just block it and move on. I'm talking about the reality of how voting as an aspect of threaded forums works, and the outcomes of it shape the nature of lemmy/fediverse activity.
All of it is about balance. Any tool can be abused by mods, admins and users. The tools' merits aren't solely determined by their potential for abuse. The benefits have to be weighed. It has to factor in what other tools are available (or aren't).
My advice to mods? Use vote records sparingly. If you're not intending to very rigidly screen for your community as a place of safety, chances are that it won't help much. You'll run yourself ragged trying to figure out who is and isn't engaging in fuckery as opposed to fat fingering buttons, or is voting their conscience and just happen to be opposed to the subject matter, or genuinely think that a post or comment isn't on topic and relevant/useful and think that about multiple posts.
It's a sucker's bet. Save it for when you're trying to get a new community rolling, or when your community is a vulnerable shelter.