this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
484 points (100.0% liked)

News

29504 readers
3638 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the wake of the killing, widespread public animosity towards health insurers ― and UnitedHealthcare specifically ― may explain why the company quickly limited who could comment on their tribute to Thompson.

Still, people still found a way to express how they felt ― to the tune of more than 90,000 laughing reactions as of Friday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 199 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh my fucking god - Facebook has redacted the number of reactions.

Little pissbabies.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 months ago

I think this is a feature that any page/profile can enable.

[–] [email protected] 157 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I don’t care if banned from LW I’m done w this instance

Billionaires, and those like this guy who enable them, must face consequences

This is a ripe time for a movement

We must capitalize on this now. The trump trash have dominated any sense of a movement for far too long

Death to tyrants

Bats to bootlickers

[–] [email protected] 55 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Why would you be banned? Everyone has been posting about this

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 months ago

Cause lemmy.world has been banning people for expressing that sentiment lol

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 months ago

Some people need the extra drama in their lives

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Because I already was!

“Seems like justice was served” was all I commented to be banned

This is my last comment from the instance in done w it. I encourage all to change instances. Fuck .world

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ah fair enough, that's a reasonable reason to be concerned

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because extremist rhetoric is banned in any decent space.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

In what world is: "An individual who has been earning millions from allowing preventable deaths to take place deserves to die" extremist rhetoric?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago

In the pearl-clutching liberal world where people still can't understand why she lost when it was her turn

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Advocating for anybody's killing is extremist. It's literally the most extreme thing you could inflict upon somebody.

Revenge and justice aren't the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, you're right. It's fine that these executives go into meetings and enact plans that harm and kill sick people, while they profit. They should be allowed to do that without consequence. The fact that this one man killed only one person, and without personal profit, is abhorrent.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

We do it once, and people are up in arms, they industrialize the process and make billions.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They actually sometimes are the same thing.

Would any sane person advocate against Hitler's death after learning what he did?

The difference is that our government sanctioned that target ~80 years ago, but this one was against the law. Both people brought large numbers of innocent people to early graves in this world.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Billionaires, and those like this guy who enable them, must face consequences

I would propose the following approach:

You need to put them on trial in a legitimate court (i.e. exclude compromised judiciary systems).

If the oligarch/senior lackey is found guilty, you could use real rehabilitation methods that would creates incentives for good behaviour for other criminals:

  1. Full asset seizure (every last cent, home, house, everything).
  2. Extended family and business partners being required to sign affidavits detailing their knowledge re: assets in [1], with an understanding that if the affidavit was found to have not been signed in good faith, they will be subject to full asset seizure and their own family and business partners will also have to sign similar affidavits for their own case. No statue of limitations for affidavits.
  3. 20 years mandatory live-in community service as junior support person at a hospice centre (minimum wage). Exact focus of community service would depend on crimes committed.

I am not saying this is currently possible. Just pointing out that there are "win win" approaches that do not require extra-judicial killings (albeit the nature of human history is such that sometimes people are left with no other options).

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I agree that’s a more proper response. I was super drunk last night but there is no longer a court in America that isn’t corrupted because the Supreme Court is corrupted and they overrule

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 103 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There's no doubt in my mind that if I end up homeless on the back of some billionaire getting richer, I'm on a fuckin hunt.

Bring me to jail, what, you think I don't want that piece of dick cheese dead AND a roof over my head? Don't tempt me with a good time.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Politicians but especially rich people seem to forget that when we have nothing to lose, that's when revolutions happen.

JFK's quote has been ringing in my head since all this has happened: Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

These assholes have stacked our government against us. Sure we have some good eggs but the level of progress especially in the last 20 years has slowed to a crawl.

UHC shooter is the beginning.

Remember: the 1% made the rules.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Fun fact; I caught a 30 day ban once off /r/politics for a comment that was explicitly that quote by JFK, attributed to him. "Promoting violence."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If that's promoting violence then so is saying "Happy Independence Day."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The fuck are you still doing on reddit?!

I haven't looked back since I left and absolutely enjoy Lemmy.

"Don't half ass two things. Whole ass one thing."

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Echos of an Arab spring perhaps?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 57 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Anyone else feel like we should give the gunman a free pass, btw?

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I took one for the team and went to Fox News to read the user comments on the first story I could find about this. It's pretty telling that even there, the overwhelming sense I got -- in between the "Obamacare is why healthcare is so bad!" and the "where's Hunter's cocaine, Mister FBI?" and the "our so-called nation is secretly run by acolytes of a shady transnational world government" -- is that they don't understand why this is getting any more attention than any other random street crime in the big bad city.

Even MAGA doesn't care; wrong kind of billionaire, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

The MAGA public doesn't like billionaires in general, they just like Trump and Musk. That's it. It's a cult of personality, not anything based on actual values or policies.

Obviously MAGA is funded by them in the background, but the average MAGAt doesn't know that or care.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, MAGA doesn't have principles or anything even resembling a coherent world view.

I've had more than a few conversations with MAGA types who agree massive corporations are running rampant and are a major problem, but then go on to advocate for deregulation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This company is absolutely tone deaf to the animosity around the death of this company units CEO.

For decades they have been the dealers of death across the United States through their “delay, deny, defend” industry policies. Historical, among the worst offenders of this practice and it shows in their stock price.

So now they act shocked when 1 no name, piece of shit (he was behind the decision to use AI to deny claims…), rich cunt gets gunned down in the streets like a stray dog? To UHC, this should just be another business day, business as usual.

Short term results of his death:

  • UNH stock dip
  • profit maximizing policies put on short hold across industry (already seen 1 company pull back changes on anesthesia limits)
  • “fear” lingering in the minds of health insurance executives

Long term:

  • as stocks recover and new administration rolls in, policies re-instated
  • install new generic cookie cutter CEO
  • 24/7/365 armed security details provided to C-level executives, and ultimately whatever costs passed down to policy holders
  • wait for media cycle to end/move on
  • nothing changes for the people

One thing I do notice is an increase in bi-partisanship around the death of this one person. If it gains enough traction beyond the memes, could this be the catalyst that unites the working class against the rich thus causing real and permanent change?

One can hope, but I’m honestly not holding my breath.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What I wonder is what other industries might prompt the same level of hatred.

Private prisons companies? Hedge funds? Drug companies? Cryptocurrency exchanges? Payday loan companies? Dollar stores?

It would be a shame if it were only health insurance companies that were scared.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Private military companies, such as Blackwater (or whatever they've renamed themselves this week).

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

I honestly don't think so. Many Americans have had personal experiences with bad insurance, but hopefully not Blackwater

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Oil, tobacco (I guess you said drug) companies, Monsanto/Bayer, nursing home and hospice admins...

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago (16 children)

To be fair,bif Facebook had a "shrug" emoji, this would have never happened.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago

Haha torch these fucking ghouls

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We and our 870 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device.

Damn... Can't wait to reach the 1k...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What's this crap? I can't see the counts anymore.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 months ago

They turned off our ability to see because of the overwhelming amount of laugh reacts

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Slain ceo lmaoooo

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›